JDJ is scripted right ?? - Page 17

Created

Last reply

Replies

167

Views

9.8k

Users

32

Likes

186

Frequent Posters

-lazybee- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
I haven't read 21 pages...But I'll stick with my opinion that the show is scripted no matter whoever wins😳so far deserving contestant had never won this trophy..
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-



P.S: I wonder what happened last season when sushant was saved by VETO power, was the uproar this huge??

Umm.. just a small correction.. Sushant's example was different last time.. in the faceoff the bottom two had to perform.. Sushant did perform like other contestants (unlike Isha who is still not fit to perform).. yana and sushant both performed so well that judges could not decide whom to eliminate and used up their veto power to select both instead. It wasn't like Yana was selected or the better one or the one who performed and Sushant didn't perform like Isha and was saved by the veto power or anything like that. Both performed, both were good, both were selected.
And regarding the uproar.. yes.. the uproar was there last time too. Salyana (Salman Yana) fans were angry and claimed that Sony was biased towards Sushant and Ankita cos even in wilcard both Ankita and Yana had been selected instead of one contestant😆, just like this time three were selected instead of two (surprisingly I didn't see much uproar this time😛). There were sarcastic comments that time too.😆
Anyhow.. it was thoughtful of the judges to veto Isha in keeping in mind her previous track record and the extent of her injuries... but it is also understandable if the other contestants are dissatisified with it. After all, they too are working very hard.. and how far can this go on.. the judges can't just hand over the trophy to Isha keeping in mind her past track record when Isha isn't even performing! Isha Salman have to perform at some point to stay on in the show,. Just my two cents.
Edited by nikitagmc - 12 years ago
3283 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Umm.. just a small correction.. Sushant's example was different last time.. in the faceoff the bottom two had to perform.. Sushant did perform like other contestants (unlike Isha who is still not fit to perform).. yana and sushant both performed so well that judges could not decide whom to eliminate and used up their veto power to select both instead. It wasn't like Yana was selected or the better one or the one who performed and Sushant didn't perform like Isha and was saved by the veto power or anything like that. Both performed, both were good, both were selected.
And regarding the uproar.. yes.. the uproar was there last time too. Salyana (Salman Yana) fans were angry and claimed that Sony was biased towards Sushant and Ankita cos even in wilcard both Ankita and Yana had been selected instead of one contestant😆, just like this time three were selected instead of two (surprisingly I didn't see much uproar this time😛). There were sarcastic comments that time too.😆
Anyhow.. it was thoughtful of the judges to keep Isha in keeping in mind her previous track record... but it is also understandable if the other contestants are dissatisified with it. After all, they too are working very hard.. and how far can this go on.. the judges can't just hand over the trophy to Isha keeping in mind her track record na! Isha Salman have to perform at some point. Just my two cents.

Agreed that she won't be lifting the trophy. After having no performances and the VETO, both have cracked her record of being the winning candidate, so I highly doubt she will win. I think she is been kept for her good performances, TRP and votes.



You are the first person to have replied to my P.S after 21 pages of redundant information 😆😆

Thanks for the info, I didn't follow last season at all, so have no clue how it all worked. Guess there will always be a uproar when it comes to the controversial VETO.

nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-



You are the first person to have replied to my P.S after 21 pages of redundant information 😆😆

Thanks for the info, I didn't follow last season at all, so have no clue how it all worked. Guess there will always be a uproar when it comes to the controversial VETO.

You should have been here last season. You wouldn't have wanted to come back😆. Sushant - Ankita were the favourite punching bags for many last season. 😆
You said Isha is being retained for her good performances, TRP's and votes. But will it work? I highly doubt. Isha is no star. She has no fan base. From what I have seen, she has been loved for her performances only. Now if she is not performing constantly.. then for how long will the audience keep voting for her, when there is an uncertainity in her future performances too cos of her injury. Her dances increase TRP's agreed.. bt when there is no dance by Isha.. where will the TRP come from? Where are the good performances? I don't understand the channel's strategy here to keep them in the show unless they want to keep the audience in suspense and make it a 'phoenix rising from the ashes' story.
lunza thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
Okay .. dont really want to comment on the topic as such ... bucz i havent read all the posts .. just a few.. and well , I am a bit out of the loop here ..
but just wanted to clarify one thing about Sushant's "veto"

There was an actual , well ,you can call it .. "rule" which was followed last season for those who missed out on a performance .
Daya and sushant could not perform one week because of injury .
Their score was taken as 0/60 and hence were in bottom two the next week.
They had to dance in face off .

Daya lost in the face off so he was eliminated . Sushant pulled through on the basis of his face off performance.

The judges said they are going to use their veto power to save both Sushant and Yana .

Veto is given to the one who is weaker.. less votes.. something like that.. that is what it means conventionally...
Sushant won the round fair and square..
He was as good as yana.. he didn't need a veto..

(heck , Sushant actually requested to be allowed to quit the show , because he felt it wont be fair to go through to the finale without performing the previous week , as he mentioned in the episode while talking to the judges... )

in fact we can start a debate saying did sushant get the veto or did yana get the veto??






-GayabCat- thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-



I know what you mean, all the voters and their votes, guess it's all business !!!

I really wish someone can come up with a reality show which isn't scripted so we can at least see how a reality show supposed to progress without any tampering !!!


but a reality show should nt be fixed in the first place
chor they are, making us fools and earning money by asking us to vote for no reason when they already planned who going out 😡
lunza thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-



You are the first person to have replied to my P.S after 21 pages of redundant information 😆😆

Thanks for the info, I didn't follow last season at all, so have no clue how it all worked. Guess there will always be a uproar when it comes to the controversial VETO.


Going by the.. ermm.. rules of the format. :
50% weightage is given to the scores and 50% to the votes ...
Daya and Sushant did not get the 50% score weightage because they didnt perform , only the votes weightage could be taken into consideration .
And hence , they found themselves in the bottom two ... and performed in the face offs which was a part of the show format.

So really , Sushant didnt get any "controversial" decision in his favour .
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: lunza


Veto is given to the one who is weaker.. less votes.. something like that.. that is what it means conventionally...
Sushant won the round fair and square..
He was as good as yana.. he didn't need a veto..

(heck , Sushant actually requested to be allowed to quit the show , because he felt it wont be fair to go through to the finale without performing the previous week , as he mentioned in the episode while talking to the judges... )
So true! It was so considerate of him to think of what others might feel if he was allowed to go into the finale without performing.. and hence judges gave him the same option as they gave Daya- rest for a week and come back next week to fight in the face off if u don't get enough votes, in case you are better enough to perform.

in fact we can start a debate saying did sushant get the veto or did yana get the veto??
😆

Edited by nikitagmc - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".