Originally posted by: YoonHiChala
His NKK are his principles. You considering those as 'principles' or not is irrelevant because the context you are using that word entirely changes its meaning. The 'principles' I'm talking about are his system of beliefs. Good beliefs or bad, they are still his beliefs.
Om is not wrong, but again terribly inconsistent as always. 😆 Always acting like a Supreme Court judge and passing judgments about other people but fails to do it for himself. 😛 A bit of introspection is needed to make him realise what a contradicting buffoon he really is. 🤣
You and I BOTH know that the Hit and Run case was an afterthought by talentless Gul to give Om a story about drugs. But I have seen MANY Om haters use that as an excuse to bash him. He said that line about "choosing truth over family" because at the time there was NO such case. But later Gul introduced it so that she can get a chance to ruin Om's character and make him look like a hypocrite. Because she could not stand that anyone other than her angry character who likes to abuse poor women with no NKK get ANY appreciation.
No matter if you call Shivaay's ghatia beliefs as "Principles", those are just his beliefs. Putting laughing emoticons to say things that are insulting does not make them less so. You call Om a "Buffoon". I call Shivaay an arrogant pompous criminal who did not have ONE miniute of hesitation in ruining someone's life. Not only that, after having done such a despicable act, he had NO qualms about continuing to let her be insulted by the world and even his family.
No matter how "Non judgemental" he is of his family members, he has NO issues in judging other people who are not family. Namely Annika. WHY did he not use his altruistic attitude towards HER when he found out about her and Daksh? Is that not "Inconsistency?" Why one rule for one set of people, and other rules for other people?
Omkara has always been someone with black and white views, and he has a set way of thinking. He judges HIMSELF for hiding the truth of his sister. The guilt he feels was not letting him live. So in that sense he is consistent. If he was NOT consistent, he would feel no guilt.
They suddenly show "Ruthless Shivaay" who is so consistent that he doesnt need a "Reason" to be a jerk but just IS, feel "Bad" for crippled Sahil? WHY? That's not consistent with his character? He is not a good person, he doesnt need a reason to be bad. Isn't that what you said? So why did he feel bad for Sahil and then suddenly decide to help him? Sold Annika's house and made her homeless so her crippled brother will have a reason to stay in their house? Itana Dariya Dil? Wo bhi koi NKK less cripple ke liye? What sort of consistency is that?
A person is "Good" for a reason and a person is also "Bad" for a reason. It is either their upbringing or their character. But it comes from somewhere. You dont become a man like Shivaay for NO reason, and the makers have not done a good job explanining why he is the way he is. Where he got his beliefs? (Because his other family members dont share them). They have failed in that. But people who want to just justify him will continue to do so.
We can argue all day and all night. You justify Shivaay's criminal acts and I will say Om has his reasons for being the way he is. Lets both agree to disagree.
Edited by MrDarcyfan - 8 years ago