|| Indian Mythology:: Doubts & Discussions || - Page 14

Created

Last reply

Replies

559

Views

117.1k

Users

64

Likes

1k

Frequent Posters

Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: -simirck-

Hello every1! I hav a question related to vishnuji.
Ram and Parshuram both are believed to be two of the avatars of dashavatar of vishnu. But they both appear at the same place at the same time. Aren't they the purna avatars of Vishnu? Then how is it possible? Plz answer this one for me. Thank u!



Hi, Simrick, welcome to Mythological Masti Forum.

I may not be able to give a complete answer to your question but here's what I know:


The list of Dasavataars varies - some include both Krishna and Balarama as avatars of Vishnu. As Krishna and Balarama, they both lived together for ages. Some versions include Mohini as one of the 10 avataars, some versions say its Buddha and some say its Balarama.

According to Valmiki Ramayan, all four brothers (Ram, Bharat, Lakshman and Shathrugan) together are avataars of Vishnu (Ram -1/2, Lakshman - 1/4, Bharat and Shathrugan -1/8 each - if I remember right). Also, there is a story that says Parashuram passed on His divine powers to Ram after their meeting. Parashuram is said to be blessed to live forever and He would be Kalki's guru when Vishnu takes his 10th avataar.

The word 'avataar' means 'descending from far away'. It may mean that the God Himself personally descends to the Earth (they all live high above). Some avataars like Vamana, Parashuram, Ram, Krishna, Buddha / Balaram (as in some versions) and Kalki (He will also be born in the future) were born with flesh and blood to human parents. It could mean that these avataars were really human but possessed the ability to understand, think and process as much information as a God could. They were special as they were born with the talent and skill to comprehend the ways of a God and hence were avataars. Thus one avataar can meet another avataar.

Sorry, if it sounds too vague or far-fetched. This is just my opinion. The real reason could be much different. 😊

Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
Samana

Vibs described it right. And welcome here as well.

The only thing I'd add to what she said - there are 2 theories on when Vishnu's avatar in Parashurama ended:
  • When rishi Kashyap summoned him and ordered him to cease his genocide of Kshatriyas
  • When he accosted Rama and Dasharath during their return from Mithila after Rama's marriage to Sita. When Rama strung Vishnu's bow, that was said to be the moment when Vishnu's 6th avatar ended and the 7th one began.
There is another theory that Parashurama was not a purna avatar of Vishnu, unlike the others.
Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago
.Reshama. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
Hello everyone..i have one questions and that is that ive heard many times that Hanuman wasnt a vanaar/monkey but belonged to a vanaar tribe..and was a human. Can someone tell me the answer??=]
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
Reshma

There actually was a thread where it was discussed - when the Mahavir Hanuman show ran on Colors, there was a thread on that, and starting from the last post on pg 1, they delved into this question. Here is that thread - I think all 5 pages of it were devoted to that question.

.Reshama. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Reshma


There actually was a thread where it was discussed - when the Mahavir Hanuman show ran on Colors, there was a thread on that, and starting from the last post on pg 1, they delved into this question. Here is that thread - I think all 5 pages of it were devoted to that question.

Thank u vrish ive explored all the pages.. and ive got ma answer and still believe that Hanuman belonged to a vanaar tribe👍🏼
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: .Reshama.

Thank u vrish ive explored all the pages.. and ive got ma answer and still believe that Hanuman belonged to a vanaar tribe👍🏼


I too think that to be the case, not only about Hanuman, but about Vali, Sugreev and the others as well.

It does bring to mind one quesiton though - if Kesari was the ruler of any domain, how did Hanuman end up in the company of Sugreev (and implicitly, Vali)? Wouldn't Hanuman have become the king after him?

Another thing - after Rama's rajyabhishek, did Hanuman settle down in Ayodhya, or return w/ Sugreev to Kishkindha? The serials - particularly ASR - show him as being in the company of Rama, but Valmiki's Ramayan says nothing about him being there until Rama's Ashwamedha Yagna, and after that, Rama's Mahaprayan yatra. So did Hanuman go on to serve Sugreev, and after him, Angad?
Edited by .Vrish. - 13 years ago
Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.


Another thing - after Rama's rajyabhishek, did Hanuman settle down in Ayodhya, or return w/ Sugreev to Kishkindha? The serials - particularly ASR - show him as being in the company of Rama, but Valmiki's Ramayan says nothing about him being there until Rama's Ashwamedha Yagna, and after that, Rama's Mahaprayan yatra. So did Hanuman go on to serve Sugreev, and after him, Angad?



Hanuman did not live in Ayodhya after the coronation. He left with Sugreev and served him till Sugreev left the Earth along with Ram. After Ram left the Earth, I don't know if he served Angad or spent the rest of his time meditating in forests and caves till he met Bheema. Incidentally, does Valimiki Ramayan mention the war between Hanuman and Ram? Also, does anyone know when the Vaanar Reign come to an end? As far as I recall, there wasn't a Vaanar Kingdom when Krishna lived. I had assumed that Hanuman could have lived in Kishkinda till the Vaanar Reign existed and then left to live in the forests.
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
No, the Rama-Hanuman battle wasn't there in Valmiki, Kamban, Krittivas, Tulsidas, et al. It may have been there in the Ananda Ramayan, but I'm not sure.

You are right - in Yudhisthir's Rajasuya yagna, Vibhishan was one of the rulers who sent gifts there (not sure that he attended), but not any Vanara representative. Maybe they evolved & became humans by then ❓

Also, if Vibhishan sent gifts to the Rajasuya Yagna, did he do so for the Ashwamedha yagna as well?


Targaryen-gal thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
@Vibhishna, thank u so much. Different texts give different avatars as dashavatar. I had even read once that buddha wasn't considered as one of the dashavatar and was added much later.
@Vrish, oh so his 6th avatar ended and the 7th began. That's interesting. Hadn't heard that one before. Thanks.
Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 13 years ago
Simrick... Samana? I didn't know you had changed your username . . .

About the 6th and 7th Avataar of Vishnu, it was said that the entire Tretha Yuga would have one taraka mantra -- the name of Lord Vishnu's avataar. Both His 6th and 7th avataar was named Rama. I don't know the exact source for this but it was one of the stories I used to read randomly much earlier. It was like Shiva was explaining (to Parvati or some sages, I don't recall) that the entire Tretha Yuga will be saved by this one mantra / name- RAMA.

As for the question about Vibhishan sending gifts or wishes for Yudhishtra's Ashwamedha Yaga, all I've read about was how the brahmans who came to the yagya were treated and looked after. I don't remember any kings who visited or sent Yudhishtra when he started the yagya. I thought, the kings accept or deny the supremacy when the horse crosses their borders and not before that. It seems unlikely that any king will prematurely declare his defeat / loyalty before the horse is let loose.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".