Arpita a mere Side Character! - Page 3

Aryan is the culprit is not my opinion.. from whatever they are showing that's how it looks like..

may be Arpita wanted to remarry long back, due to Aryan's trauma she wasn't able to move on...

This is great topic. Thanks for starting it. 😘 and also thanks for tagging me 😘 we are your safe ppl woman! You can share whatever you want. ❤️

I agree that the writers need to develop Arpitas character but in a rush to move story lines along she became a plop rather than a major character that needed to be developed along the way. Hence the disconnect right now.
I also think that we need to watch a few more episodes to see how the story unfolds before we can honestly comment on this more and my hope is that they will show more of arpitas monologue and internal thoughts to help us understand her perspective.
they might have neglected her before (i agree) but now they won’t be able to. They have no choice. With AKT in Australia and no major villian in sight they got develop this story so my hope is that the focus they will give this story line will develop arpitas character as well.

❤️❤️❤️

I completely get where you're coming from.

It wasn't Aryan's loss as much as it was Arpita's.

If we look at that way, it's as if Aryan lost imlie and Arpita was shown as the one most affected. Looks ridiculous

But..

Firstly,

She has mourned. She has Expressed her loss. As mentioned before in an episode, she was in severe depression for years and is just recovering. Aryan didn't.

Secondly,

it's difficult and unfair to decide how much one should be attached to a particular relation. And there isn't a scale on how one should grieve and for how long.

A friend of mine has recently lost her mother. Her mother was my mother's friend and colleague for years as well. She was very ill for sometimes. After few weeks of aunty 's death, when we went to visit, she was eerily composed. Even when we teared up, she did not. And she was always her mother's daughter, pampered and all. We found it quite odd.

What I mean is that it was her mother. But her way of grieving was like that. And it's completely alright.

Lastly,

Aryan and imlie are the protagonists. Imlie more so. Everything will be from their perspective. So it's fine.

I do believe that if they should have built Sundar Arpita dynamics more. But the purpose of this plot is to create rift between arylie and lead to a confession. So Makers are using Arpita Sundar as a tool for that and not much.

Originally posted by: MiuniS

He might be guilt tripped as a 23 year old. But I wanna know more to the story. Why was it not Arpita who hold the reigns of the house being the eldest child and it was on Aru?

Aru has to be sorry more because he took all his jiju's work on his shoulder and moved forward... they should have explored or shown Arpita's character too. The point has came the writers talked about Arvind Aru relationship which is absolutely okay but what about Arpita Arvind. She might have move on but she should have been shown in a light a strong persona or a character now her character just moves on according to others. BM or Imlie none should say about her life at least if it's not her. It started from the start not showing her past, we saw Arvind from Aru's eyes not Arpita's. That is what I wanted to point out that they never developed Arpita's character independently

Agreed .she is a strong character actually speaking.Shr has voiced her defence against MC or even BD..don't know why she isn't speaking up ..Plus what the relationship looked like with Arvind is not displayed or spoken

I thought these kind of posts and thinking had found closure but I guess not.

Trauma differs - from person to person. Trivialising Aryan's trauma to justify Arpita's 'stance' is

You can't compare 'grief' based on relationship shared with the deceased. That's a very shallow way to look at and measure ones feelings.

PS: The above sounds mean when I reread it. It's not meant to be... I have just seen too many of these posts and still can't seem to understand the logic behind 'But he should matter to Arpita more'

Rather than the characters, the fault lies squarely in the lame writing we have been getting for the past few weeks. I was really patient with the rushed wedding but it got stupid after that. Arvind's death and the fallout was not addressed in any meaningful manner at all. So it is not only Arpita that is getting a weird arc but every single one of these characters. It is ilke a good chunk of the writing team is on holiday somewhere (did they fall sick?)....

Originally posted by: mango.falooda

Rather than the characters, the fault lies squarely in the lame writing we have been getting for the past few weeks. I was really patient with the rushed wedding but it got stupid after that. Arvind's death and the fallout was not addressed in any meaningful manner at all. So it is not only Arpita that is getting a weird arc but every single one of these characters. It is ilke a good chunk of the writing team is on holiday somewhere (did they fall sick?)....

no, its literally someones unprofessionalism and temper tantrum that has led to this.

Originally posted by: lovereading14

no, its literally someones unprofessionalism and temper tantrum that has led to this.

true true. I guess I had too much faith in the writers that they would be able to write around him and still give a meaningful closure to Arvind's arc. I got suckered by all the 100 eps that came before...

Originally posted by: lovereading14

I thought these kind of posts and thinking had found closure but I guess not.

Trauma differs - from person to person. Trivialising Aryan's trauma to justify Arpita's 'stance' is

You can't compare 'grief' based on relationship shared with the deceased. That's a very shallow way to look at and measure ones feelings.

PS: The above sounds mean when I reread it. It's not meant to be... I have just seen too many of these posts and still can't seem to understand the logic behind 'But he should matter to Arpita more'

I guess I wrote it as a reply in this post only. My complaint is we have seen Arvind from Aryan's eyes never from Arpita's. It lacked her story. Her approach. The whole Arvind thing was the hint the writers never did anything to grow Arpita's character. That girl was very much traumatized but suddenly she accepted everything. We did not see the journey in regards to it.

This post isn't for comparing traumas, it's about how Arpita is diminished as a mere side character. If her husband's story is shown from his bro in law's eyes there's very hard chance that we will see her taking any decision for herself. At the end she will be with Sundar and Imlie will decide for her. It's very clear BM will bring fraud relationship only.

The complaint is for the writers who didn't develop her characters.

I am not such a person who would end up comparing traumas just coz of relationship. I expected the breakdown when she heard her husband was actually murdered because she was shown traumatized before in the story.

I never thought you are mean with your words. The post is itself here to hear other's opinions regarding this matter. And if you see my replies you may find that this isn't about comparison it's about a character. I don't know about what others post but I can guarantee this post isn't any mockery of Aryan's trauma over Arpita's

Originally posted by: -JaZ-

Aryan is the culprit is not my opinion.. from whatever they are showing that's how it looks like..

may be Arpita wanted to remarry long back, due to Aryan's trauma she wasn't able to move on...

That would feel horrible if we think about it this way... truely. You opened a new perspective to the situation again