Originally posted by: Aleyamma47
Its nothing like that. I can write paragraphs defending Virat but what it will cost me is my TIME.
So why should I even bother to argue with you when I know you will not agree with me.
Plus, honestly, I had liked you and your comments in our previous interaction and thought you are a genuine personality who does mock and provoke others who does not think alike you which is why I did not want to argue with you.
Thanks a lot for proving me WRONG!!
The thing is I am a psychologist, and what I wrote here was a general observation for the people denying Virat's actions(which the original comment was about, the one to which I replied), not particularly directed towards you. You can of course take my statement personally, in which case I won't be able to do anything because it's your choice. So yeah, even I am not interested to argue which is why I did not engage further with you.
It wasn't a mockery or an attempt to provoke, denial is a real defense mechanism and you can always look it up, and guilt tripping me about my personality isn't gonna change my opinion about certain people disregarding the abuse and toxicity done by one or more characters in the show because they can't accept it. I could actually care less about who thinks what about my personality, especially people who can't comprehend a mockery and a generic statement stating a fact about human personality. I have had and still have great friends on the forum with polar opposite POVs to mine, and never has our thinking been a problem among us, mature people know how to respect varying opinions instead of guilt tripping.
Whether you want to defend Virat or oppose Sai or whatever that's your choice, but understand this, that discussions with different POVs aren't termed as argument. I am too level headed and sane to participate in any 'argument' over this circus called Ghum.😆 Peace out!
Edited by Cold-Fire - 2 years ago
3