still half way reading your post. But give this point a thought. because all the indications to indirect narrative in the past still haunt me 😃.
Nitu made a nice point yesterday. Why does Virat keep saying that Pakhi cant become mother. If the marraige is real, and he is sad that she cannot become mother, does it mean he would have eventually impregnated her if not for the surgery?
Then why did he look at Sai with discomfort when Pakhi screamed they cant extend their family after knowing about her surgery.
what are his plans if the womb removal didnt happen? Our hope on marriage being fake is gone, now how can he prove he didnt intend to move on with Pakhi?
Oh yeah we have KJ saying Sai is still Virat's wife which I think is a lollipop. How is he not boiling when Pakhi accuses Sai of seducing him? HOW?
The P we saw right after leap was different. She was not seeking her rights as a wife. So the question of a child never arose. If we remember BK's constant nagging for baby, and P and V's discomfort. It was evident that they had a pact and they respected it. P never demanded a child then. She had accepted the dynamics as they were. And that first fight we saw where V MU the HM planned by BK. He was shocked and repulsed.
Only post Savi's truth, did things take turn for the worse. V too never seemed to be worried about it. It is only when P started insisting on her right over him as a wife and her need to be a child of her own that V started to play along. His discomfort visible always.
Till the time P knew that she was physically fit to be a mother, this desperation never came up. It is only now that P can't have a child is when the whole question arose.
Then the question is what changed from that initial pre-leap situation to now? That too doesn't tie up.
For the last part Sadhika - He is an @%#$