WHy are people angry with CVs for Pakhi scenes?

They’re showing Pakhi in a very negative light, they’re showing how she is throwing herself at Virat, with no dignity while he is rejecting her advances, how she is lying in front of the family about friendship then behind closed doors she has another face, she’s happy when another woman is denied food, she’s characterless but questions another woman’s character, she loves a man who loves someone else, what’s there to be angry about? We should be happy, these Pakhi scenes are needed for the audience to know she’s in a fully negative role. With Sai they’re showing how a good woman faces a lot of hardships in life but despite that is still good, and a terrible woman faces little bit of obstacle and becomes a total vamp. They’re trying to show us how good people may suffer but they’ll remain good regardless, there’s a lot to learn from Sai and that’s what they’re teaching. Everyday complaining about creatives is draining specially when they’re trying to fulfil our demands in a wholistic way, this is why CVs don’t pay attention to us anymore.

Yup! It would have been infuriating if there were any ambiguity in her portrayal, or that of Virat's feelings toward her. But it has been established indubitably that she is friendzoned. And with each episode her mask of dignified conduct and maturity is weaned off and Virat will eventually stop regarding her even as friend. So I don't mind her getting screen space or importance as it is necessary to expose how vile she is.

Originally posted by: idkwhattoput

They’re showing Pakhi in a very negative light, they’re showing how she is throwing herself at Virat, with no dignity while he is rejecting her advances, how she is lying in front of the family about friendship then behind closed doors she has another face, she’s happy when another woman is denied food, she’s characterless but questions another woman’s character, she loves a man who loves someone else, what’s there to be angry about? We should be happy, these Pakhi scenes are needed for the audience to know she’s in a fully negative role. With Sai they’re showing how a good woman faces a lot of hardships in life but despite that is still good, and a terrible woman faces little bit of obstacle and becomes a total vamp. They’re trying to show us how good people may suffer but they’ll remain good regardless, there’s a lot to learn from Sai and that’s what they’re teaching. Everyday complaining about creatives is draining specially when they’re trying to fulfil our demands in a wholistic way, this is why CVs don’t pay attention to us anymore.

It is not about Pakhi scenes that many have issues. If they do not compromise on the screen space of Sai and Virat due to addition of Pakhi’s scenes, don’t think it will bother them. Yes, we need to see the contrast but that doesn’t mean that other scenes looks like rushed ones.

Many even felt the scene where Virat enters Pakhi’s room to apologise for what Sai spoke looked rushed. Virat trying to convince Sai for the trip looked like a rushed scene. It doesn’t matter if there was a scene with Pakhi right after that provided the scene prior to it was good. So while adding new scenes, they can atleast ensure they don’t compromise on other scenes.

Sometimes there seems to be no proper closure to a scene.

Originally posted by: laksh

It is not about Pakhi scenes that many have issues. If they do not compromise on the screen space of Sai and Virat due to addition of Pakhi’s scenes, don’t think it will bother them. Yes, we need to see the contrast but that doesn’t mean that other scenes looks like rushed ones.

Many even felt the scene where Virat enters Pakhi’s room to apologise for what Sai spoke looked rushed. Virat trying to convince Sai for the trip looked like a rushed scene. It doesn’t matter if there was a scene with Pakhi right after that provided the scene prior to it was good. So while adding new scenes, they can atleast ensure they don’t compromise on other scenes.

Sometimes there seems to be no proper closure to a scene.

Yes balancing is important...

But here seeing pakkhi virat scenes sometimes i forget who is his wife..sai or pakkhi

Originally posted by: akniti

Yes balancing is important...

But here seeing pakkhi virat scenes sometimes i forget who is his wife..sai or pakkhi

dont know whether they are showing reel or real

Originally posted by: idkwhattoput

They’re showing Pakhi in a very negative light, they’re showing how she is throwing herself at Virat, with no dignity while he is rejecting her advances, how she is lying in front of the family about friendship then behind closed doors she has another face, she’s happy when another woman is denied food, she’s characterless but questions another woman’s character, she loves a man who loves someone else, what’s there to be angry about? We should be happy, these Pakhi scenes are needed for the audience to know she’s in a fully negative role. With Sai they’re showing how a good woman faces a lot of hardships in life but despite that is still good, and a terrible woman faces little bit of obstacle and becomes a total vamp. They’re trying to show us how good people may suffer but they’ll remain good regardless, there’s a lot to learn from Sai and that’s what they’re teaching. Everyday complaining about creatives is draining specially when they’re trying to fulfil our demands in a wholistic way, this is why CVs don’t pay attention to us anymore.

i agree with this post, but the problem is not only that.

even am having fun watching pakhi get rejected every time she takes food for virat😆

my issue here is we are not getting balance in this. more than half of the episode we get family drama and sai fighting and pakhi talking nonsense. after bearing with all that we get more and more pakhi scenes. her alone scenes,, dil ke baatein, scenes with virat.

aaj tak we dont know what all virat thinks..aur uske dil ke baatein, but we know everything that pakhi thinks cuz we get 'her' alone scenes...😛

most of all it is becoming a 'pakhi oriented show'. most of the screen time is dedicated to her. there is no balance.

hafte mein 1-2 bhar we get sairat alone scenes, but 'har' episode mein kam se kam 1-2 we get virpakh scenes.

not only about the show. even in show promotions they promoting virpakh scenes not sairat.

abhi virat has done this much of Hungama right? u know which scene they were promoting? scene when pakhi gets from food and he accidentally breaks the plate..and the caption says 'virat wasted the food so pakhi's mood is upset' keep watching to know further...😆

when virat took chai for sai there was a segment on it and neil was saying this is for all the husbands out ther, take care of ur wife etc etc.

when he held sai's hand soo tight, they did interview on that scene also there they spoke about how sai did pardafash of virapakh's relation, not even a line was mentioned about holding her hand like that and all. abhi i dont think they will talk about not letting sai eat food or about money thing.

saaf saaf naainsaafi from all angles. in show, promotions, IVs and everything. am not talking about neil and aish here 😆

we are like mad fellows watching the show for sai and sairat and what we get is pakhi and virpakh and justifications on their characters lol... kisse gussa nay aayega?

we at least got a platform to share out thoughts here, am glad that we are being able to pour our frustration here. kyun ki kayi aur tho koyi sunta nay hai

I think there is an excess of Virat Pakhi scenes. Sairat is not shown enough. Once a week, at the most.

Today's scene with Virat was not essential. Just to show his increasing irritation? I would prefer if he did it regularly rather than only when he fights with Sai. I would also prefer that he stops confiding in Pakhi about Sai.

Fans wait to see Sairat. We don't get them..neither on screen nor off screen. In fact, according to people who have watched both versions, Sairat scenes are cut !!

This is the unfair part.

Otherwise I think most of us know she is an essential part of the serial.

Originally posted by: idkwhattoput

They’re showing Pakhi in a very negative light, they’re showing how she is throwing herself at Virat, with no dignity while he is rejecting her advances, how she is lying in front of the family about friendship then behind closed doors she has another face, she’s happy when another woman is denied food, she’s characterless but questions another woman’s character, she loves a man who loves someone else, what’s there to be angry about? We should be happy, these Pakhi scenes are needed for the audience to know she’s in a fully negative role. With Sai they’re showing how a good woman faces a lot of hardships in life but despite that is still good, and a terrible woman faces little bit of obstacle and becomes a total vamp. They’re trying to show us how good people may suffer but they’ll remain good regardless, there’s a lot to learn from Sai and that’s what they’re teaching. Everyday complaining about creatives is draining specially when they’re trying to fulfil our demands in a wholistic way, this is why CVs don’t pay attention to us anymore.

Yup, sorry to mention it here but immj2 team should also do this because of people's constant demand and whining about ongoing tracks and in way of trying to satisfy them they are ruining the story and characters and then also these whiny people will complaint about bad story.

You made a good point here

The argument is not so much of the portrayal of XYZ. It’s more of the fact that they are constantly

focusing on Pakhi when she has no character growth whilst ignoring Sai who is their main lead.