Agreed, NO has to be expressly communicated. Indication of interest/disinterest has to be significantly expressed by whether the victim is male or female. Coz law doesn't recognize silence. Silence can neither be termed as consent or dissent.
Yes, maybe we have had to bear the DeDi for more time onscreen than "the love of her life", that's why we are able to actually classify her intentions better than him. And I'm sure he will not perceive her advances as having ill- will or 'sexual color' for a long time to come.
He will definitely find a diplomatic way to counter her as always. It has 2 reasons, one being her "blackmail to leave" and secondly, I feel it is his basic nature to always give "safe answers" (which only changes around Sai)
I doubt if he actually will get a vibe. He could have even got some hint when she was forcibly trying to feed him the other day but i doubt if he did. Any prudent person in his position would get a vibe, but here if he doesn't see through her words and gestures then I can presumably say that either the IPS is dumb or indeed he actually enjoys the attention.
That lady and any of her actions has got nothing to do with Samrat absolutely. She's more excited for packing bags and sightseeing with the devar than the official work she's going for (which actually isn't even a work) or looking for her missing husband. Samrat is only her license to be in the house and victim card that she can pull out whenever she feels the need to. If virat still turns blind to it then I have serious doubts about this man too.
Members Lounge
CID
3