Pressurize and Bashing an ACTOR?-Drashti Dhami - Page 9

Originally posted by: _innocent_

gr8 post viji...<3...

i cnt wait for this matter to be settled... i guess if one feels uncomfortable one is allow to share her opinions after all she is only an actress-.. those bashing her.. continue and wen she leaves i wish u all the best watchin any serial🥱

the hilarious point is most wanted MC cuz they wanted romance😕 and now they are makin a big issue abt it😕 for me i dnt want MC but if the actor is not comfortable toh phir i will have to adjust to that or risk havin her leave the show and since she is the only reason for me watchin this show.. i dnt want her to go anywer..<3

she rocks for me<3..

she made the character geet and portrayed it wiz perfection <3 and i will always love her- thanks DD for bein such a sport-

even if article is true(which i doubt) and thats Sbs aunty is a liar also.. the jail track never even occured🤢 then am still goin to support DD - if others can have exceptions on the set then why cant she?😕

ps how can she disagree wen she knew abt the pregnancy track all along..< definiteli food for thought<3 think abt that instead of bashin her😃

niwayzz sorry viji if i went off topic😊

Originally posted by: shanti05

After reading somany topics regarding DD not wanting to have a bump belly and feels uncomfortable, I feel that the best solution to all this is just have a 4 month leap, and show her giving birth to the baby and she is back with her flat tummy..

The other question is will she be able to play the role of a mom..

Then the CV's will show miscarriage, but the the whole essence of the show seems to be changing since the idea of the character of geet is she is fighting society who traumatized her that she has spoil t her family name and has finally found her knight shinning Armour to make her live a life of respect !

If her conern is just not wanting to have a belly .then the best solution is to have a quick 4 months leap and have her holding a baby...

Tomorrow they can just make a quick annoucement of a leap befire the start of teh show and then show her giving birth to teh baby or
show a quick baby shower and then the baby os born the following episode due to akllthe stress she has gone thought

Just my thoughts !

Guys sometimes such reports are really publicity stunts so I would give a very objective opinion on this. The thing is that some actors may refuse to do roles of father or mother it's really upto them but while taking up a project if somebody knows that in future such a track is going to come up & he/she gives his/her approval to it & then refuses to do so then it's really unprofessional behaviour.

Similarly if an actor thinks that he can't do negative role then he should not accept the role in the first place. Changing the story as per the wishes of the actor's is really messing up with the story & it's a cheating with the viewers as well.

Such things remind me of the typical nakhras of the actors few decades ago. These have been mocked in films as well like in Om Shanti Om where SRK forces the director to add Darde Disco. LOLZ... 😆😆For female actresses it used to be "I would not play a mother". And many times directors put the sets on place and actors would say "aaj mood nahi hai" or they would just disappear from the sets forcing the director to packup. All these things are unprofessional and cause a huge loss to the storyline.

As an actor if you believe in yourself & the director & the script you can do wonders & nothing will be able to stop you.

As many people have mentioned before had Dev remain negative the story would have been more interesting but the actor refused don a negative character. So story got messed up. But didn't we like Karishma & applauded her for projecting a negative character? Now Dev's character has completely gone missing & the track is simply lost.

If DD has problem in showing a bump them they can show a 4-5 month leap after which Geet gives birth to a baby. (personally I won't prefer it but if the actor remains adament on it then it's the only option). And as far as the problem of having a baby on the sets is concerned people should know that there is no need to show baby in every scene. And if they can use BD of lead actors, they could also use a doll instead of a baby. 😃

They can also show baby in the cradle & Geet taking care of baby & simultaneously studying further.

Edited

If baby track wasn't planned then they should have ended it before the engagement trouble. There were many situation when it could have happened but they always projected that Maan will protect her & the baby ( Golden temple scene). why that scene was there if they had not planned it earlier????

Plus if it's a youth show doesn't mean you can kill the babies. Loss of a human life is really big. It's not a joke but I think we have seen too much of Ekta shows so that we don't feel like losing someone. Though the channel is catering to the tastes of youngsters, the audience of this show is from 20-30 age group where many have settled in their lives. So they should also care for their sensibilities.