Dharmakshetra :) - Page 76

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

61.4k

Users

32

Likes

1.7k

Frequent Posters

Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Sadhana_pr

Hello everyone!

So I managed to find my way to this thread now but have no clue what was discussed here all along. So pitching in at the current topic-the KK daan-

I personally find this incident to be amoral in character having very little to do with right or wrong. Hence neither warranting praise nor blame. Indra did a repugnant thing to begin with, Karna just replied in kind- keeping the distasteful flavour of the entire incident intact. In fact I think he did an intelligent thing to exchange something (whose utility I am doubtful of) for something which might potentially help him in the future. I have very little knowledge of the epic but I don't remember his hyped KK ever doing anything which a non-divine ordinary armour could not do. (Unless the ⭐️MB version is true and it could magically appear and disappear😆).
Hence if I am going to blame anyone, it's got to be Indra. Again not for ethical reasons, but for tactical ones. If I want to exploit my enemy's virtue/idiosyncrasy and have myself already thrown all pretence of scrupulousness , then I might as well take full advantage of the situation. I know my enemy is under vow to give ANYTHING I ask for and I don't want him to face my son in his lethal form then I should begin with the essentials--like say...his thumb (ok i dont want to copy Dron!), so his hand, or perhaps his life (Rishi Dadhichi style maybe). Technically I would expect him to make a daan of all this too and this would waive off the danger with certitude. But instead I go and ask for an accessory and not just that I end up giving him a mighty weapon which has higher chances of killing my son!
I can so imagine Arjun telling him-Just do me a favour, never ever try to help me in future. Please leave that to Madhav!😆


Hi Sadhana
Long time no see

KK wasn't just an accessory it was definitely an advantage that Karna had .Though it didnt make him invincible.Krishna ji himself told the same to Arjuna

Vasudeva said, Great is the joy I feel. Listen to me, Dhananjaya! This that I will tell thee will immediately dispel thy sorrow and infuse delight into thy heart. O thou of great splendour, know, O Dhananjaya, that Karna, his dart being baffled through Ghatotkacha, is already slainin battle. The man does not exist in this world that could not stay before Karna armed with that dart and looking like Kartikeya in battle. By good luck, his (natural) armour had been taken away. By good luck, his earrings also had been taken away. By good luck, his infallible dart also is now baffled, through Ghatotkacha. Clad in (natural) coat of mail and decked with his (natural) ear-rings, Karna, who had his senses under control, could singly vanquish the three worlds with the very gods. Neither Vasava, nor Varuna the lord of the waters, nor Yama, could venture to approach him. Indeed, if that bull among men had his armour and ear-rings, neither thyself, bending the Gandiva, nor myself, uplifting my discus, called Sudarsana, could vanquish him in battle. For thy good, Karna was divested of his ear-rings by Sakra with the help of an illusion. Similarly was that subjugator of hostile towns deprived of his (natural) armour. Indeed, because Karna, cutting off his (natural) armour and his brilliant car-rings, gave them unto Sakra, it is for that he came to be called Vaikartana. Karna now seems to me to be like an angry snake of virulent poison stupefied by power of incantation, or like a fire of mild flames

So here krishna ji is himself telling about the advantages of KK.Though i agree he might be exaggerating it a little bit like i said it didn't make karna invincible like krishna ji is portraying but it was definitely an advantage not just accessory

Also Arjuna was quiet happy about the help provided by Indra😆.He had no complaints.Infact all pandvas were very happy as clearly mentioned in epic.

Also KK was much more advantageous than shakti.Shakti could have only been used once and that too once karna had exhausted all his weapons.This was no where in comparison to KK which came without any terms and conditions
Edited by Sabhayata - 10 years ago
Arijit007 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
the debate regarding karna is realy confusing to me.
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Sabhayata

I think Krishna's appreciation for Karna was probably not genuine. At the time of his death, Krishna viciously tears into Karna.


Anu how does one decide what's genuine or not😆

Krishna ji at many places criticizes karna and then praises him to the sky as well.I guess one can say what's genuine or not according what suits them .That is at least what most do

Personally i feel krishna ji was neutral when it came to karna.Criticized him for his mistakes like where he was wrong and praised him for where he was right.So i accept both krishna ji's criticism of karna and appreciation

In any case even if we dont take it as appreciation we can say krishna ji is stating fact that he was devoted to Brahmins and this is in addition to what Bhishma also says

Hence showing that Karna's devotion to Brahmins was a well known fact even to his enemies or those who didn't like him much
Edited by Sabhayata - 10 years ago
.Vaikartana. thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Sabhayata

I think Krishna's appreciation for Karna was probably not genuine. At the time of his death, Krishna viciously tears into Karna.

But Anu Krishna here is appreciating Karna for entirely different things.Yes I agree he had flaws but that will not nullify his good qualuties I guess.
AnuMP thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Someone post that bit from KMG where Krishna just lets it all out against Karna.

Am not arguing against Karna or Krishna here, am.just saying that when someone speaks like that to a man who is seconds away from being killed, that's I s more likely to be genuine sentiment. Basic pyschology, that's all.
Edited by AnuMP - 10 years ago
amritat thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
I would go with Sabhayata here...
Lord Krishna does praise Karna for his warrior skills...n his generous nature...and also criticises him for his participation in activities with Duryodhan...So, yes...in a way, he exaggerates in both cases but also shows a neutral activity.
AnuMP thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Amrita
When I get home I will post what he says to Karna. It was extremely tough. It was unambiguous and not neutral at all.
Edited by AnuMP - 10 years ago
amritat thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Amrita

When I get home I will post what he says to Karna. It was extremely tough. It was unambiguous and not neutral at all.



I know wat he had said...that wicked wretch dialogue... 😆
It's the harshness of those words that make many feel that the praises were only to make sure Arjun does not get over-confident...

It's difficult to interpret Lord Krishna's words...
TheWatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Maybe Krishna said those things because he wanted Arjuna to not feel bad for killing a person who is bad, hence the recount of his sins etc etc.

I don't think anyone can interpret when Krishna's words were genuine and when they were not.
Edited by TheWatcher - 10 years ago
AnuMP thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
No one can interpret any one else's words.

This is neither against Karna nor against Krishna as individual people. But I am looking at their interactions with each other, and what Krishna says at the time of Karna's death was particularly vicious.

If he said it to make certain Arjun doesn't feel bad, then he should have better asked his Bua Kunti to keep her lips zipped. Which is what I think she should have done anyway.

If Krishna did it to ease Arjun's guilt, he could have done it after he died. Krishna did not have to inflict a wound in his soul at the moment of his death.

If he actually did that to Karna just to ease Arjun's guilt, then it makes Krishna a very cold and brutal man indeed.

That kind of anger cannot be dismissed as easily as that. Psychologically speaking that was eons of anger built up and finally vented
Edited by AnuMP - 10 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".