Originally posted by: ...Diala...
<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#006600">neither am I sure about it.. but I guess it is from manu.. remember reading similar lines from MB D&D thread..</font>
<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif" color="#006600">I still remember how noisy it was saying Sutas are no less, Sutas are more or less Kshatriyas blah blah blah.. but almost went like 'how dare you' when I asked if Krishna and all Yadus were Sutas😆</font>
This concept of Suta really confuses me...
On one hand, we find Sutas like Keechak who was feared even by the King...Then Sanjoy too was not exactly a very downtrodden person...
Then y is Karna rejected n insulted everywhere for being a Suta? If being a warrior was a taboo for Sutas, then wat about Keechak?
And if being charioteer's son was the issue, then y did people have problem with him even after becoming the King?
As for the theory of seven generations of princesses...the children of Brahmin women n Kshatriya men were Sutas, who did not have the priviledges of either...Was Pratiloma marriage treated like this only between Brahmin women n Kshatriya men or is it between woman of any caste n men of comparitively lower caste?