Ekta's masala version of Chandrakanta - Page 2

Originally posted by: NandiniRaizadaa

I thibk thoze looking for the novel"s story shpuld nit watch thid show. They will only be frustrated

If some thing is fristrating you bettee to not watch it

Originally posted by: Luna99

But there is nothing positive in this show.

The story of this show is pretty good, though a little bit convoluted.

Also the sets are Pretty well

But the number of negatives in this show outnumber the number of positives(aare dohi toh positive hai, woh bhi treasure hunt Karke dhund nikla maine) by a huge margin.

Bad vfx, bad acting,bad costume, bad makeup,bad script...

All this thing makes the show unwatchable.

Also the pace is too uneven.

Some times too fast, sometimes itna dheeli that you've to fast forward through it.

Also the characterisation of the characters is extremely uneven.

And contrary to what people thinks, I'm not finding the novel's story in this show.

My question is, why this show's name is Chandrakanta when there is only 5 percent of the book in this show.

Even Mission Impossible has 20 percent (or even more than that) of James Bond in it.

But is its name is James Bond?

No.

Because James Bond and Ethan Hunt are ultimately different persons, though they share some qualities(actually similarity of JB and EH is more than what EK's CK share with the book CK).

My problem is that when the protagonists of this show don't retain the essence of personality of the book's protagonists, then what is the reason Of naming them Chandrakanta and virendra!

And I'm saying this because there is another TV show based supposedly on the same book and they're much truer to the book.

So now EK has made this show so different from the book, she should have even not used the names of the characters and names of concepts (it is obvious that she absolutely has zero understanding about the concepts of tilism and ayyari) from the book also.

Originally posted by: Sonu.Ka.Vishal

u must b huge fan of gaurav kritika (I love them too) but I found colors CK more interesting so m watching colors one.. U like life ok then go to there forum watch tht CK ..its just a show audience will decide is date.. the show just started if u don't like it just dont watch it simple

Originally posted by: Luna99

Bhai , I am not a fan of Gaurav Kritika.

Basically I hate that show.

I was looking forward to this Colors one to see if EK has done something better, but she managed to make her version crappier.

Just like that.

Life ok version also has its flaws, but I didn't find it necessary to discuss that show In this forum

Oh yeah, kritika makes a much better Chandrakanta than this Madhurima tuli (atleast KK doesn't look like a chudail ).

And this comes from a neutral viewers who don't like both shows

Originally posted by: Luna99

But there is nothing positive in this show.

The story of this show is pretty good, though a little bit convoluted.

Also the sets are Pretty well

But the number of negatives in this show outnumber the number of positives(aare do hi toh positive hai, woh bhi treasure hunt Karke dhund nikla maine) by a huge margin.

Bad vfx, bad acting,bad costume, bad makeup,bad script...

All this thing makes the show unwatchable.

Also the pace is too uneven.

Some times too fast, sometimes itna dheeli that you've to fast forward through it.

Also the characterisation of the characters is extremely uneven.

And contrary to what people thinks, I'm not finding the novel's story in this show.

My question is, why this show's name is Chandrakanta when there is only 5 percent of the book in this show.

Even Mission Impossible has 20 percent (or even more than that) of James Bond in it.

But is its name is James Bond?

No.

Because James Bond and Ethan Hunt are ultimately different persons, though they share some qualities(actually similarity of JB and EH is more than what EK's CK share with the book CK).

My problem is that when the protagonists of this show don't retain the essence of personality of the book's protagonists, then what is the reason Of naming them Chandrakanta and virendra!

And I'm saying this because there is another TV show based supposedly on the same book and they're much truer to the book.

So now EK has made this show so different from the book, she should have even not used the names of the characters and names of concepts (it is obvious that she absolutely has zero understanding about the concepts of tilism and ayyari) from the book also.