DBSK depictions & presentations - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

45

Views

11.4k

Users

14

Likes

52

Frequent Posters

RoseFairy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#11
i was not a fan of jsk...but in my opinion dhriti portrayed krisna's childhood..in that phase we don't differ between a girl and a boy...except some pervert people anyone doesn't differ between 2-3 yrs old boy and girl...so dhriti was completely justified for krisna...but in jsk some tracks were imaginary..the sequences were dreamy...some picturization was in dreamlight which looked fake...but over all they followed original story..and they used traditional costumes
but in dwarkadhish the picturization is invery darkness and look very gloomy.as it was in ekta's mahabharata...they are not following original story..their character sketch is imaginary too...in krisna's behaviour to balram and in rukmini's behaviour they are taking liberties...jarasandha's costume is inspired from greek costumes too...and acting of the most of the leads are not good...except vishal(though he is giving same expression)
vishal is doing good...vishal and priya's chemistry is ok but priya doesn't look like laksmi or rukmini...laksmi avtar should be more divine...and other actor's acting is lookink fake too..sp. shishupala,rukmi,revati...this was not a problem with jsk
i think and i hope cv's will be back in original story..we have to wait..as krisna's life is too long so there are lot's of chances for improvement ..
chemestry thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#12
DBSK is much far better than Ekta's Mahabharat👍🏼

ekta's mahabharat was most disaster show


there is no comparison betn DBSK and Ekta's mahabharat😊

we can compare this show with other show like JSK, old shree krishna or nitish bhardhwarj show but😊
plse don't compare with the stupid show of ekta😡
RoseFairy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#13
i am not comparing..i am just saying abt costumes and picturization of some tracks not story...costumes are like that of greek warriors which ekta's mahabharata had...otherwise dbsk has just started there are so many tracks left to get improved
Edited by jhum_86 - 14 years ago
chemestry thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#14
i love the show and

it has feeling of sagar's show
because of the good songs play on every situations and krishna's getup👏

i only not liking jarasandh costume
he should have wore crown with the normal indian mytho costumes 😊

he look odd man out in the show compare to other character😕
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 14 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: jhum_86

i was not a fan of jsk...but in my opinion dhriti portrayed krisna's childhood..in that phase we don't differ between a girl and a boy...except some pervert people anyone doesn't differ between 2-3 yrs old boy and girl...so dhriti was completely justified for krisna...but in jsk

Dhriti playing Krishna would have been fine, had the end character looked like a boy. He didn't - despite Dhriti's costumes, there was no mistaking that it was a girl (maybe particularly due to the hairstyle), w/ the result that I could never escape the feeling that Krishna, as depicted in that serial, was a girl. That's why I personally found it tough to swallow - it didn't seem much different from the odd Christmas presentation that sometimes has Santa Claus as a woman. If Dhriti had been made-up so that it looked like a he, then I wouldn't have had anything against her playing the role. And I thought Krishna was much older at the point where Dhriti stopped playing the role.
ghotalaz thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#16

@Chemestry & Vrish, I thought I was the only person in this entire world who had problems with the little Krishna in JSK😳 However my problems were not related to the character being played by a boy or girl bcoz I didn't know she was a girl, I found out only later after her role ended. What I actually felt was that the Sagars should have taken a bit elder kid who could have executed the scenes properly. I do agree the little Krishna was cute but most of the time I felt that the expressions & dialogue delivery were not apt according to the situation. I know the dubbing was done by someone else with all those pauses in between the sentences & it suited the little Krishna considering the age. I always had discussions on this topic with my mom who loved the little Krishna so much & she always said it's a big thing for a little kid to act like that at such a young age. Now that was my problem, the cuteness of Krishna was not enough for me, I wanted the scene to be done properly, the dialogues, expressions & everything. Sorry Dhriti fans!


I always felt & still feel even today that Ramanand's Shri Krishna has always been better than JSK. Whether the childhood, or teenage or the adult period, everything was simply great in the old version. I just can't get off with the memories of the show & maybe that's one reason why I couldn't enjoy JSK that much & now I'm finding DBSK a bit over dramatic😵 But then if that's the case how come I love both the old & new version of Ramayana coz comparisons were there too?😕 Something is wrong in the new Krishna serials😕


Talking about this article, I've started liking Vishal & Hemant too👍🏼 Regarding Priya, well she's not bad but it's just that I think she should work on her voice modulation. That divine glow which is needed is somewhere missing on her face; Sagars need to work on it. She looked better in the Friday's episode, maybe bcoz all brides look good on their wedding day LOL! But she's a good actress. Despite the Duryodhan hangover I readily accepted Puneet as Jarasandh, bcoz he's simply a fabulous actor & fits into any role so well👍🏼. The actor playing Rukmi is good in my POV but as Vrish pointed out, the costume is not apt & the Sagars are playing with the character. In fact there seems to be a problem in the costume department except for Krishna's costumes. Why don't Kings have raj mukuts on their head? 😲However I'm not impressed with Shishupal, just like I was never impressed with Ravan in the new Ramayana The negative characters in mythos should be given a menacing look & that's lacking in DBSK (except for Jarasandh). I think Basudev & Devki are fine. Revathi is very good. Don't blame me for bashing the characters/actors; the article started it first LOL!😆

I just hope the Sagars pay more attention to the casting department from now onwards. I guess I might be having problems in future to accept the Pandavs & Draupadi bcoz of the BRC's Mahabharat & Ramanand's Shri Krishna hangover😉


I missed the first episode so no comments on the Kalyavan track from my side. The Rukmini episode has been dragging over weeks. I don't know how many liked that scene but I felt that leaf floating scene was too filmi🥱 The Chamkila (eunuch messenger) scene was also unnecessary👎🏼 Sagars are rushing up some track & dragging the other tracks


What I actually love about DBSK? Well, the devotional songs played in the background are melodious & I just love them😍 The performances of the actors are good from their side. It's only the look & costumes bothering me. The execution of some scenes are really good. I don't mind fiction or dramatization being added bcoz at the end of the day it's a TV show. Sagars have full rights regarding cinematic liberties but within a certain limit without altering the facts For this a lot of homework is needed to be done. I hope the Sagars will improvise the next tracks & take into consideration all their weak points so that DBSK can get better coz it's definitely not impossible to make this serial better

Edited by vik rocks - 14 years ago
RoseFairy thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#17
i didn't have any problem with dhriti that she is a girl ..but yes i sometimes used to think too that ye krisna bada kab hoga??
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#18
I think that in the costumes department, the serial has improved in the way they show the Pandavas. Here, only Yudhisthir & Dhritarashtra are shown wearing crowns, while the others wear headbands. I do wish they didn't copy BRC for Bheeshma's makeup other than his beard, but instead lent some more color to him. After all, nowhere is it written that he was always decked in white. The silver crown also looks strange.

Also, both Satyabhama & Jambavati nowadays address Krishna as swami, which is certainly a major improvement in them addressing him as Dwarkadheesh, or Murlidhar. In fact, Satyabhama's acting has improved a lot - it's just too bad that her major roles are behind her.

I do think that Draupadi is the one ace they have remaining, and they better choose her carefully. Not just a beautiful actress, but a really good one as well. Let's see who they pick.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#19
I hope they choose a new face and not someone we've seen already either in other mythos or more importantly, other shows. I think such an actress could really make a good impression on viewers if chosen well. I also feel her acting should be given higher preference than her looks. Obviously Draupadi should be beautiful, but looks are subjective and if her acting is really well done, people can overlook her looks if they are average.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#20
I've been keeping up with the last few epis, and i'm truly shocked! This show no longer resembles Shri Krishna's life whatsoever! If you compare the current track with the earlier Rukmini Haran one, which was actually quite good after seeing all this junk, one would not believe they are watching the same show if it wasn't for Vishal.
I'm really disappointed, especially since this is coming from the Sagars. They are totally destroying their reputation with this show!
I think it's about time the Sagars stepped down and let others take their place for mythological shows, at least anything that has to do with Lord Krishna. I don't think the new generation Sagars know Lord Krishna's life at all.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".