Why is it wrong? - Page 3

Originally posted by: SujiZ

nothing wrong if its mutual but why dont the same for a woman ?is this CV ready to do make a concept like shorvouri lives with parth and another guy,or teni with parth and aman ?

Encouraging polygamy on the basis of mutual consent shows a regression to our progress. This is a step back for women empowerment where women are encouraged to develop skills and confidence to get financially independent, and maintain a healthy family and lifestyle. Polygamy is unhealthy stepping beyond the norms of decent behavior and is morally and ethically wrong at all levels. You are also breaking the law.

Lol...people have such screwed up notion about woman empowerment..
I have nothing to say..clearly shows why show gets trps and why we the " social preachers " are called delusional...and considered bigotry because we say this is atrocious even if a woman is happy in doing wat she is doing even when its legally wrong and morally very wrong..
Like seriously...a woman shud do wat it takes to make the man she loves giving up her self respect and identity and since tats what makes her happy its empowerment 👏
Where can women who shout about woman empowerment on social media actually succeed when they are countered with such low class arguements, inspite of being educated themselves such people do not seem to understand as to how this is also woman objectification... 😕

Lol!! Women empowerment is not two women having one husband for the sake of love! Women empowerment is nothing to relate with this shit!

Originally posted by: PerviParmeshwar

Do you realize the show is watched by mostly women (esp. housewives) who are the TRP audience? Since the TRP of the show is always good & its the slot leader.. means audiences prefer & likes to watch it over all the other shows on TV.

So if the show is 'objectifying' women or showing them in bad /negative light.. then do you think the TRP audience will continue to watch it anymore? NO!

To me bigotry is the fact that some social media warriors who talks so much of women empowerment & all that don't wanna respect & accept a women's fully conscious choice & decision.

If that's what makes the 2 girls happy.. then why is it a problem? To me, that's empowerment.. a bold one indeed. If a woman makes a choice on her own, which gives her happiness & also not hurting others in the process should be respected.

So no offense, but all the trashing of the upcoming track by the social media warriors to me is bigotry where women's decision is called wrong & not accepted.

Objectively speaking what is going on in the show is certainly not justifiable. In absolute terms the decision observed by the female characters is not taken on a happy note. They have made a compromise so that all can remain under one roof and lead a secured life. Although Shourvari being an educated and self sufficient woman earlier, should have been bold even enough to walk away from the scene with her daughter. This could have gained viewers appreciation. We have to be bear this in mind it is a show not a case of an individual. It has got a prime time status. It is the makers responsibility to include contents that is health in nature also beneficial for people at large. Through entertainment they owe to relay a progressive message which is widely acceptable. After all we can't pass on the buck of social accountability on others, shrugging it off our shoulders.The uproar would have been misplaced if it was directed towards a particular person.

Mutual consent and compromise is not women empowerment Lo!!!

If having relationship with two women at a time is progressiveness, then why to follow the formality of marriage even? There can be as be as many women at Parth's house as he wants, with everyone's consent, and they can stay in live-in happily for the whole life. Why to follow a regressive custom of marriage that binds one man to one woman and vice versa?

Originally posted by: PerviParmeshwar

Do you realize the show is watched by mostly women (esp. housewives) who are the TRP audience? Since the TRP of the show is always good & its the slot leader.. means audiences prefer & likes to watch it over all the other shows on TV.

So if the show is 'objectifying' women or showing them in bad /negative light.. then do you think the TRP audience will continue to watch it anymore? NO!

To me bigotry is the fact that some social media warriors who talks so much of women empowerment & all that don't wanna respect & accept a women's fully conscious choice & decision.

If that's what makes the 2 girls happy.. then why is it a problem? To me, that's empowerment.. a bold one indeed. If a woman makes a choice on her own, which gives her happiness & also not hurting others in the process should be respected.

So no offense, but all the trashing of the upcoming track by the social media warriors to me is bigotry where women's decision is called wrong & not accepted.

Its wrong koz even in 2018 or 50 years ahead, 2 women living with, loving and sharing one man will bring out a very nasty feeling. JEALOUSY.

Originally posted by: _goofyCat_

If having relationship with two women at a time is progressiveness, then why to follow the formality of marriage even? There can be as be as many women at Parth's house as he wants, with everyone's consent, and they can stay in live-in happily for the whole life. Why to follow a regressive custom of marriage that binds one man to one woman and vice versa?