Why is it wrong? - Page 2

Originally posted by: PerviParmeshwar

Gosh you're taking it to another level which is not even relevant.

The case you stated @Bold is not even relevant because then the women as you said 'has no choice'.. but here both the girls have choice to move on yet they don't want to because their happiness lies within each other in some way. So its not wrong.

& the example you stated in comparison to what i said was absolutely wrong.

So you mean to say what a woman desires for herself is always right? Even if its lusting or loving another's hubby?
Going by ur pov..teni loving a married man even when his wife was alive was right...and makers showing tat even if u love a married man with or without his wife around will one day achieve her dreams of attaining him..and the legal wife will accept it..so ho ahead and dream about them is also right acc to u? What a girl wants doesnt really make it legally acceptable or morally right...
The girls have a choice..but are these people letting them choose it? They are emotionally blackmailed and brought back..be it teni or shorvari...so u cant really say that they both want this either

Originally posted by: PerviParmeshwar

Parth loves both Teni & Shorvori. Both the girls love Parth.

Ipshita's biological mother is Teni.. but Shorvori is Parth's wife & hence she's her daughter as well.

So all 3 of them living together is the perfect ending to this beautiful & emotional journey of their lives full of ups & downs.

That way Parth gets to live with both the girls he love without sacrificing one for another. & the 2 girls who clearly loves Parth also gets to live with him. & Ipshita will get love from both her mothers.

What's wrong in it? How about the fact that polygamy is illegal in India? Take it in real world sense...women are happy.. Okay.. Baby will get love of 2 mothers.. Fine

Originally posted by: PerviParmeshwar

I think its okay if Parth-Teni-Shorvori decides to live together happily. Parth promised to give both the girls equal rights sans any bias. Plus all 3 of them have no problems with it & have full consent to the decision. No one's forcing them to take this decision. Its a mutual decision. So what's wrong in it?

Its 2018 for crying out loud.. we shouldn't have such regressive mindsets.

I'm happy if all 3 live happily together .. & Ips get the love of 2 mothers.

That is both illegal and illogical. No one in their sane mind will come up with such a disgusting idea (I'm talking about the creatives of this show). One of the ladies will have to wise up and get the hell out of Parth's life and Parth should consult a psychologist ASAP. As far as the spoilers go, Teni was ready to leave the house for good but it's Parth who stops her. I mean what the heck is wrong with this guy. First he did suicide drama to get Shorvari back and now when Teni is ready to move out, he is not letting her go. And what exactly are they planning to do? Stay under the same roof as Parth's two wives. I am feeling disgusted to write that, forget about watching it. I don't think even the TRP aunties will want to watch such a disgusting thing. And what happily ever after are you talking about. One day or other, this house of cards is going to break and when that happens, Ipshita will be the one who will be hurt the most. Just because her parents are jerks doesn't mean that the poor child should suffer.

Originally posted by: _goofyCat_

What is the definition of progressiveness according to you? A man living with two wives??

First thing is that having two wives or two husbands is illegal by law, at least in India. And as a part of the society, we human beings need to abide to those laws.

Second, it is clear exploitation of both the women, irrespective of the fact that they are happy with it or not.

Do you think that both the women have got into this arrangement wholeheartedly? If given a choice, what would Teni or Shorvori choose, having Parth only for themselves or sharing him with the other woman?? Have they actually agreed for this solution happily or because of the reason that they don't have any other option?

Lets assume they are happy now with this option of both the women having no issues sharing Parth as their husband with each other. What is the guarantee that they will be happy in the future too? Assume a hypothetical situation that at some point of time both of them want to have se* with Parth as both are his wives. What should they do in that situation? Parth fulfilling the desires of both of them one by one?? 🤢

A husband is NOT a relation that a woman can share with anyone else and vice versa. It is disgusting and puke worthy to even think that a man can keep relationship with two women as wives at a time, that too living under the same roof. Sorry but there is nothing progressive about it 👎🏼

Looks like either you haven't watched those particular episodes of the show or you are confused about the term biological mother. Ipshita's biological mother is Shorvori and NOT Teni. Teni just carried the baby that was result of artificial insemination.

It's even more disgusting to see the actors supporting this nonsense. Just saw Rashmi's IV and she was saying ALMOST the same things the TM said. These people have made a complete mockery out of term friendship. They are using it as a card to get away with things like bigamy. I get that the actors are paid to do their job but at least don't promote such nonsense in your IVs.

nothing wrong if its mutual but why dont the same for a woman ?is this CV ready to do make a concept like shorvouri lives with parth and another guy,or teni with parth and aman ?

The makers are encouraging polygamy, that too in today's climate, permitting a man to live with his wives in a civilised society consisting of well informed and educated members. Sadly the actors happily supporting this rotten and perversive decision. Probably the hefty pay packet is ruling on the uppermost part of their minds, therfore instead of ridiculing and walking out of such an irrational and ineffectual show. They have got nothing to oppose . Sadly some of the viewers are rejoicing and lavishing something close to adoration on the decision just because the role is being performed by their favourite. Her charisma is enhancing their adulation with each passing day. Therefore they have failed to analyse the demonstrations with proper reasoning. Forces of darkness seems to having completely engulfed the script writers, although the show may be a commercial success. But it is a disaster in terms of spreading a positive message via entertainment. Bigots for once should reflect within, to hear the voice of their conscience. This serial is seriously objectifying woman and earning trp by showcasing her as a mere plaything for a man. We seriously need to sign up petition against the current track where the makers are pitching perilously on an age old mispractice. It's all sham and fakery, should be condemned tooth and nail.

Originally posted by: snowflakes2119

The makers are encouraging polygamy, that too in today's climate, permitting a man to live with his wives in a civilised society consisting of well informed and educated members. Sadly the actors happily supporting this rotten and perversive decision. Probably the hefty pay packet is ruling on the uppermost part of their minds, therfore instead of ridiculing and walking out of such an irrational and ineffectual show. They have got nothing to oppose . Sadly some of the viewers are rejoicing and lavishing something close to adoration on the decision just because the role is being performed by their favourite. Her charisma is enhancing their adulation with each passing day. Therefore they have failed to analyse the demonstrations with proper reasoning. Forces of darkness seems to having completely engulfed the script writers, although the show may be a commercial success. But it is a disaster in terms of spreading a positive message via entertainment. Bigots for once should reflect within, to hear the voice of their conscience. This serial is seriously objectifying woman and earning trp by showcasing her as a mere plaything for a man. We seriously need to sign up petition against the current track where the makers are pitching perilously on an age old mispractice. It's all sham and fakery, should be condemned tooth and nail.