Rikara marriage true or false - Page 3

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

What is a fake phera? In RiKara there were no mantras (forget wrong ones) and no Pandit(forget fake) n as per as legality is concerned RiKara has no legal binding as well, n as per Hinduism both polygyny n polyandry is permissible so being married has no religious restriction

Hence CVs can't show RiKara symbolic n ShiTia not ShiTia was much more ritualistic than RiKara

Originally posted by: manny136

I dont even get hindu marriages coz i keep on seeing dif ways n all r accepted. I didnt know polygamy was allowed interesting, but in the show legally the shitia marriage had no standing😆 its what they r going by. I guess once the obbros got married the first time legally, symbollically, drunk etc it all counts😆 the rest is just drama to expose stuff😆

Rikara isnt binding in anyway but for gauri at least its symbolic n in even visually they keep on harping on it😆 its what they will play on, they even had the khoon baari maang stuff😆

We shouldnt get into logic it wont get us anywhere just go with what the cvs wanna show😆

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

If u remember arnav khushi first marriage 2 was also this kind only, arnav only put sindoor & mangalsutra on khushi , declared it to be 6 months contract.

So here he fill her mang with his blood , even took pheras. So its common in serial to consider these marriage real.

If u see thou this marriage is not valid but it has some effect on omkara.

Originally posted by: .SNOWWHITE.

this is a symbolic marriage.its a hint dat gauri is made for om watever d circumstances may b at d end dey will b together.