no laks i dont agree on some points like dharam didnt arrest veer...when dharam said u cant ask for freedom like this veer said only one thing if u cant give to my people then i'll tsnatch it from u...veer is an xtraordinary character if he can save dharam ,bhimu,sakshi and pari from fasi when whole army was there then what was the reason of him to surrender himself in front of aryavrath...kya apne liye woh kuch sainiko ko maar nahi sakta tha...but he wanted to give dharam a chance because he had some xpectation from him tand dharam openly challenged veer....agar dharam sab kuch jaan kar veer ko arrest karta toh uska character bohot weak ho jata.....and why would veer ask for money from dharam...he was against the idea of stealing in the begining but after seeing dharam's reaction he changed his mind
as far as sia is concern...she is an outsider she was not supposed to talk like that to shramiks...if dharam feel that these shramiks dont deserve eqaulity even then why he discussed that matter in front of her....veer only stopped sia...he said only one thing...sabko apni baat kehne ki aazadi hai...he didnt took shramiks side...dharam could have done the same but he stratched the matter by saying yes she is right ...shramiks are getting food because of aryavraths...now that was the limit
Anupamaa
