Originally posted by: lakshmim_84
no sonu, its not like that... veer knows that if he asks dharam to do this for shramiks he will do it..... he allowed shramiks to enter the temple, he did not arrest veer, even when he had a solid proof that veer stole the foodgrains(the lettter that veer left int he godown). so dharam will do anything that veer asks him to do, for the benifit of shramiks... also, i am sure, if veer had directly asked money from dharam he wld have given it, even if dharam knows that money is being used for buying weapons...........
the only place where dharam supported sia, is when the shramiks were ridiculing dharam....... n sia is right there.... dharam is a maharaj.if he lives a life of luxury, why shld shramiks be jealous of that... n show disrespect to him, by commenting abt him.......... n also, during that scene, dharam never supported her for trying to slap the shramiks, he just said, that what sia said is right........ even i agree with that action of hers....
dhram doesn't get influenced by sia's words... like when sia came n started complaining abt shramiks, n asked dhram not to allow them inside the temple, dharam got angry n went out... then why is veer getting so much influenced by those shramiks
so even now, i feel, stealing was completely wrong............ n that too, when dharam allowed them to come to the yatra, they show their gratitude by stealing his money.......... i am sure, now sia n aryasabha willt ell dharam that "see the consequence of allowing them, these people r not worth to be anywhere near aryavrats...... look at their morals....... v allowed them to come, n stole our money..now do u understand, why we kept them far from aryavrats"..what answer will dharam have then........
Shiv Shakti
