\|/ DKDM Episode Discussion Thread \|/ - Page 69

Originally posted by: rinall

@Quixotic5 and @Surya_krsnbhakt

That's precisely what we're blaming... The writer's banal attempts at creating unnecessary drama... Parvati's 'maika' never had anything to do with her taking the form of Devi Kanyakumari... The premise on which the whole track is based is itself flawed... They shouldn't have shown the Kraunch story the way they did, for Kraunch never was Parvati's brother... And Adi-shakti (or any other deity for that matter )would never take an incarnation to administer "justice" based on the "an eye for an eye " theory... This ploy to create drama could have a retrograde effect 'cause in a way, the current plot seeks to justify vengeance... If Menavati's right in seeking revenge from Banasur who hardly had a role in her wretched son's death & she can manipulate Adi-shakti into it , why was Lohitang wrong in wanting to avenge his brother's death ?? Or for that matter how are the several people (asuras included), who seek revenge for the killings of their kith & kin, wrong in baying for their nemesis' blood ??

In this case, according to the way they've portrayed the story so far, it would make sense if Banasur meets his end if he abuses the powers of the boon he received from Mahadev & torments innocent people; rather than be made to pay for what happened to Menavati's crooked son...

Originally posted by: jyoti07

there was a time when not even a single dialogue used to get repeated in the show and thats what made the show most unique and interesting but nowdays except a few lines lines everything looks and sounds same and lame.."ghatnakra" "niyati mein hastakshep" " bahut kuch parivartit hone wala hai" "sabhi ko apni bhumika nibhani hogi"...they can atleast work on the dialogue during the last few days of the show..

and one more thing

whenever something was about to happen makers used to show that only for two or threee episodes i mean like "purvanubhuti" and now it takes a whole month of "purvaanubhuti" before the track begins..i feel sad really very sad...i have nothing more to say

Originally posted by: kaatayani

@bold.. this tendency coincidently begins with entry of Mr. Utkarsh Naithani... for he says tht everything comes out from the story..if the story is pathetic then how can the diologues remain aloof??

Originally posted by: jyoti07

true all this begin with the entry of utkarsh..when brijmohan ji started writing again for dkdm..he brought the freshness thats why raja durdum and gyanmurti track was successful and even got trps..no boring dialogues, no unnecessarily stretching of the track.

i wonder what if he wrote tracks like samudra manthan..viewers would have to bear the torture of parvati complaining and throwing tantrums as to why mahadev had to drink halahal and then mahadev as usual had to pacigy and manaofy her with same boring dialogues 🥱

Originally posted by: jyoti07

you know what i think,i think makers got overconfident during lohitang track thats why they bring utkarsh back..they thought it will be as hit as jalandhar track but their plan backfired..i would have love to see brijmohan's version of lohitang track and i can bet that i would have been way more good and successful..would have loved to see what they showed in the promo of lohitanf track.. i think they made that promo when previous writer was working on the track.. would have love to see maahdev vs all five asurs but damn...nevermind they failed to repeat history of jalandhar track

I think there should be a concerted effort to make sure that UN never writes anything ever again😆