\|/ DKDM Episode Discussion Thread \|/ - Page 46

Created

Last reply

Replies

928

Views

94k

Users

31

Likes

1.9k

Frequent Posters

983175 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
^^ Another surprise.. 😳 😉 😆

Arijit007 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
well, atleast tulsi is remembered as a good devotie and tulsi leaves are considered dear to vishnu, so i belive, the settlement was done outside the court.
aparupanath thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
chalo...thank god😊😊now dhire dhire my anger will reduce.i expect the casanova dude vishnu, to return to his comfy-bed now, and remain satisfied with lakshmi ,rather than wandering here and there and getting cursed😉
rsnarula67 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Whoa there, I go on a short break and come back to such a lively discussion.
Sad to have missed it.
Here's my two bits worth, based on stuff I have read, this is just a general view :
From what I gather the Vedas are the real and only fount of knowledge, the Purans are like animated versions, according to which God is the primary in each particular Puran the stories bend that way.
The Vedas acknowledge the primacy of all, animate, inanimate, irrespective of the gender, size etc. Also there is no gender assigned to God (here I am not very clear about how God is actually approached, I am just starting to learn ...)
The Purans are apparently a way to put the ideas of the Vedas in a more simplified manner - which is understandable to us very dense human beings. Also, it is perhaps the most tampered with, in the sense that each generational change gears the stories towards the attitudes of that time depending on the mind set of the orater. As the society became more Patrichial, the standing of women was downgraded. This is reflected in these stories of Tulsi, Lakshmi, Parvati etc. The petty jealousies etc - where it is always the female who seem to be ... and are also attributed to be later writings or rewritings
It is like the various versions of the Ramayan - the original Valmiki Ramayan is said to be more balanced, whereas the later day versions are more 'progressively regressive' (is that an oxymoron?)
My op is also that the advent of the invaders, who after conquering the land went on a spree of undermining local belief systems (as has been done throughout history, by invaders all over the world - Mexico is another prime example), had a lot to do with the stopping of the evolution of thought in the right direction.
Without the invaders, I think that the regressiveness would not have been so enshrined and in true Indian tradition of being argumentative - things would have evolved more positively with better understanding.
DT Sahiba, way off the topic I know, but just had to put in my thoughts. 😊
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Vedas & Puranas come under the category of Shruti & Smriti.
This link may help in knowing the difference between both.
http://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/hinduscriptures.asp

Puranas were known more because of their story format, which was easy for people's reach then Vedas.
Stories can be heard & interpreted. The main aim of Vedas & Puranas was to make people connected to the Supreme Consciousness, which take different forms, names. They are just an important step in one's Spiritual journey. It's up to individual to get stuck or move ahead in the path of Self Realisation.
rsnarula67 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Minakshi, thanks for the link.
Although I have trwaled the net for a lot of info on the sacred texts, but somehow missed this site.
Edited by rsnarula67 - 10 years ago
Arijit007 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
and thus ends the dkdm version of tulsi shaligram katha, anyway, it was a good epi though.
kaatayani thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: rsnarula67

Whoa there, I go on a short break and come back to such a lively discussion.

Sad to have missed it.
Here's my two bits worth, based on stuff I have read, this is just a general view :
From what I gather the Vedas are the real and only fount of knowledge, the Purans are like animated versions, according to which God is the primary in each particular Puran the stories bend that way.
The Vedas acknowledge the primacy of all, animate, inanimate, irrespective of the gender, size etc. Also there is no gender assigned to God (here I am not very clear about how God is actually approached, I am just starting to learn ...)
The Purans are apparently a way to put the ideas of the Vedas in a more simplified manner - which is understandable to us very dense human beings. Also, it is perhaps the most tampered with, in the sense that each generational change gears the stories towards the attitudes of that time depending on the mind set of the orater. As the society became more Patrichial, the standing of women was downgraded. This is reflected in these stories of Tulsi, Lakshmi, Parvati etc. The petty jealousies etc - where it is always the female who seem to be ... and are also attributed to be later writings or rewritings
It is like the various versions of the Ramayan - the original Valmiki Ramayan is said to be more balanced, whereas the later day versions are more 'progressively regressive' (is that an oxymoron?)
My op is also that the advent of the invaders, who after conquering the land went on a spree of undermining local belief systems (as has been done throughout history, by invaders all over the world - Mexico is another prime example), had a lot to do with the stopping of the evolution of thought in the right direction.
Without the invaders, I think that the regressiveness would not have been so enshrined and in true Indian tradition of being argumentative - things would have evolved more positively with better understanding.
DT Sahiba, way off the topic I know, but just had to put in my thoughts. 😊



this one byfar has the BESTEST descriptiton of the "original" stuff debate 👏👏
kaatayani thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
this version of Shankha-Tulsi went over my head and left me seething in anger for attitude of the Tridevs..
and when the hell will Mahadev play a dad that he is..

Arre yudh nahi karna..toh kam se kam ek baap toh bann jaaye.. for all his anshes he will stand on the hilltop and snigger and taunt their attitudes.. but never His Lordship shall NEVER descend his hilltop standing place and keep a fatherly hand upon the head of his "accidental" sons
aparupanath thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
😲😲by the way, in today's episode,vishnu said about his sambandh with tulsi was continuing from chirkaal and will continue,.which sambandh he was talking about❓

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".