\|/ DKDM Episode Discussion Thread \|/

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#441

Originally posted by: Quixotic5
In the version that i read online some time ago , Lakshmi came to know about it after Vishnu committed this deed..and she was not happy with Tulsi , though miraculously she forgave Narayan..and Vishnu was hurt with Lakshmi ill-treating Tulsi ..so finally Narayan asked Tulsi to leave Vishnu-lok for he couldnt bear to see her suffer & live on earth as she was meant to be "tulsi plant" & thereby granting her divine status & he himself residing with her in some other form..

😡the writers always try to show tulsi and vishnu in the positive sense and lakshmi in the negative way,but no one can erase vishnu's grave-mistakes with the ladies😡😡he was the culprit, and i doubt ,he had some ulterior motive behind breaking tulsi's chastity ,besides his so-called srishti ka kalyan😡😡that cunning vishnu, whose feet is constantly massaged by the innocent lakshmi😭, what blessings does he give s to lakshmi❓to present a sautan to her❓that dude vishnu is most welcome to carry on with his cassanova-image😡😡but for that he should not have married lakshmi and hurt her and disrespect her by bringing a co-wife to her😭😭the goddess of fortune is very unfortunate in this matter😭poor lakshmi devi.😭

Quote

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#442

Originally posted by: kaatayani

wat hell of a version is this.😲.. seriously.. I want to ask the writers of yore that "Kya Khake Puran likhe the "

like Lakshmi forgave vishnu and started ill treating Tulsi... Na aaradhya acche nikle na unki biwi

😡😡for those writers who exhibits lakshmi as a jealous wife and white-washes and glorifies vishnu and tulsi, i would like to present some questions to them-------------------what do they expect lakshmi's reaction on getting a co-wife❓should she spread her arms wide and welcome tulsi❓and encourage her husband the 'dude vishnu' ,to repeat these kinds of acts by accepting tulsi❓if she would have accepted tulsi 😡😡our indian society, which is alkready facing innumerable problems, would have gone to hell.,😡and the wrongdoers like vishnu would have been encouraged to commit bigamy and other offences.😡😡so , whatever devi lakshmi did was right👏 also,tulsi was not without any fault😲where did her big big commitments go when she accepted vishnu's proposal of marriage❓😡😡where did her love and dedication towards shankhchud go when she decided to be the SAUTAN of goddess lakshmi❓😡 this is the difference between lakshmi and tulsi, because lakshmi ,in her sita-avtaar ,rejected all the offers of raavana and maintained her pativrata, and her one-man-womanhood.👍🏼👏 so, i believe in the mother goddesses[ parvati, lakshmi ,saraswati] more than the father-god[talking about vishnu only], ,or the puranic-writers.😊😊this is because, parvati, lakshmi and saraswati are as innocent and strong as our bholenath mahadev😊

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#443

Originally posted by: kaatayani

for that matter I consider Purans as fictional as DKDM.. when I read stories like Narayan's, I ponder that Wud God do thus..?? Does not God means good and welfare of all..one who is equal to all..!!

since Ages man has followed scriptures or fiction according to what appeals to their minds... and secondly when speak of Original Beliefs.. where is this originality..?? distorted scriptures to suit a sectarian ideology?? As for DKDM..i believe that it only reflects change in the societal mindset..for undoubtedly it has dealt with the stories in a way where it seeks to look beyond sectarian beliefs.. point out the importance and interdependency in a simpler form... and we must remember our "Original" history with all religious movements, where people questioned the "Original Beliefs" and they simplified their notions to the masses.

Of course i will not accord DKDM the status of a movement..but i wont deny that their version is more sorted out and definitely appealing to a certain section... 😲😲the dkdm-version is quite favourable to the viewers.😊atleast,it doesn't disappoint us .,.i swear if dkdm gonna show the tragedy-drama of tulsi,by showing vishnu and tulsi in good-light and lakshmi in bad-light😡😡i am going to quit watching my favourite show😡😭😭.so, i hpoe that the tulsi-portion ends tomorrow ,or soon, because my eyes can't bear any other lady with vishnu😭,,other than his energy-lakshmi😭😭😭😭😭
i sw

Quote

983175

Suspended

Posted: 11 years ago

#444

@ Aparupa..😲 😲

Calm down , in the link that i mentioned it wasnt Lakshmi but Saraswati who ill-treated Tulsi..and yes that is even more absurd but Lakshmi's image is still safe..however, i am intrigued by the questions that u raised about Tulsi..i mean why did she accept Vishnu's proposal if she was such a chaste woman dedicated to Shankhchud ?..🤔..and that too a 'casanova dude' like Vishnu's proposal ?..😆..

Quote

Aparupa

@aparupanath

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#445

😡i strongly feel that lakshmi could have taken her sita-avtaar-badlaa on vishnu after this act by asking him to prove his purity through agni-pariksha, then he wouldn't have been able to be proved as pure and would have felt ashamed.😡atleast for once.😉

Quote

sucheta

@kaatayani

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#446

Quixie dear... that now u get serious as if DKDM Puran is real...

but then what's wrong in showing the things free of sectarian beliefs..?? at the end of the day u see the Pauranic stories and ponder that "wud GOD stoop so low.." even the originality of the "original stories" is not certified and it is full of "My God is superior than yours" stuff...

DKDM is interesting for some who found something beyond Mohit as Mahadev.. infact u can put this way that DKDM inspired many of us to go back to these "original stories" 😃

Quote

sucheta

@kaatayani

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

#447

Originally posted by: Quixotic5
@ Aparupa..😲 😲
Calm down , in the link that i mentioned it wasnt Lakshmi but Saraswati who ill-treated Tulsi..and yes that is even more absurd but Lakshmi's image is still safe..however, i am intrigued by the questions that u raised about Tulsi..i mean why did she accept Vishnu's proposal if she was such a chaste woman dedicated to Shankhchud ?..🤔..and that too a 'casanova dude' like Vishnu's proposal ?..😆..

I like it.. Casanova Dude..!!😆

Quote

mnx12

@mnx12

Channel Moderator

+ 16

Posted: 11 years ago

#448

It's Tulsi vivah tomo. So they'll end Tulsi's story on Kartik Ekadashi.
In one of the News channel in Dharma section it was shown, why Vishnuji sleeps for 4 months. The reason they mentioned was, in the war between Shankhchud & Vishnuji, after killing Shankhchud, Vishnuji was tired, so he slept for 4 months. He woke up on Kartik Ekadashi, that's why it's called Dev-uthi Ekadashi. There are many versions of same story in our Puran. People take what appeals to them & add their own bit in that.