\|/ DKDM Episode Discussion Thread \|/ - Page 44

Created

Last reply

Replies

928

Views

94.9k

Users

31

Likes

1.9k

Frequent Posters

kaatayani thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Quixotic5

In the version that i read online some time ago , Lakshmi came to know about it after Vishnu committed this deed..and she was not happy with Tulsi , though miraculously she forgave Narayan..and Vishnu was hurt with Lakshmi ill-treating Tulsi ..so finally Narayan asked Tulsi to leave Vishnu-lok for he couldnt bear to see her suffer & live on earth as she was meant to be "tulsi plant" & thereby granting her divine status & he himself residing with her in some other form..



wat hell of a version is this.😲.. seriously.. I want to ask the writers of yore that "Kya Khake Puran likhe the "


like Lakshmi forgave vishnu and started ill treating Tulsi... Na aaradhya acche nikle na unki biwi
983175 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: kaatayani



wat hell of a version is this.😲.. seriously.. I want to ask the writers of yore that "Kya Khake Puran likhe the "


like Lakshmi forgave vishnu and started ill treating Tulsi... Na aaradhya acche nikle na unki biwi


😆 😆..i read it a long time ago..right when this shankhchud track was announced , i did a google search to see if it connected with Mahakali in any way , turns out i found wht i was looking for in google books..dont remember the name of the book though but i think it was a goddess oriented book..in that version, Vishnu gets so afraid of Tulsi's wrath on violating her chastity that he immediately reveals his beautiful divine form & Tulsi faints because she gets overwhelmed by Vishnu's divine beauty..😆
kaatayani thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Quixotic5


😆 😆..i read it a long time ago..right when this shankhchud track was announced , i did a google search to see if it connected with Mahakali in any way , turns out i found wht i was looking for in google books..dont remember the name of the book though but i think it was a goddess oriented book..in that version, Vishnu gets so afraid of Tulsi's wrath on violating her chastity that he immediately reveals his beautiful divine form & Tulsi faints because she gets overwhelmed by Vishnu's divine beauty..😆


@bold... Hey Bhagwan..kuch bhi😆😆
983175 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: kaatayani


@bold... Hey Bhagwan..kuch bhi😆😆


Here :

Legends of Devi - Page 22 - Google Books Result


Interestingly, its Saraswati & not Lakshmi who tortures Tulsi..😕..so yeah Lakshmi's image is still safe..and also , Tulsi did faint at the sight of Narayan's beauty but regained her wrath after coming to senses again as in she did not forgive Narayan bcoz of that beautiful sight but was just overwhelmed by it..
Edited by Quixotic5 - 11 years ago
kaatayani thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
So then why do we root fr the Portrayal of Puranic version of the Gods?? When they are more pathetically shown in our scriptures..dkdm looks pretty good before them
kaatayani thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Quixotic5


Here :

Legends of Devi - Page 22 - Google Books Result


Interestingly, its Saraswati & not Lakshmi who tortures Tulsi..😕..so yeah Lakshmi's image is still safe..and also , Tulsi did faint at the sight of Narayan's beauty but regained her wrath after coming to senses again as in she did not forgive Narayan bcoz of that beautiful sight but was just overwhelmed by it..



Shocked to death..😲😲😲 Saraswati looks pretty meek and humble to torture someone, Brahmaji's 4 heads might have dropped at the sight of his wife turning cruel... so wat did she do to torture tulsi?? played a bad tune on her Veena
983175 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: kaatayani

So then why do we root fr the Portrayal of Puranic version of the Gods?? When they are more pathetically shown in our scriptures..dkdm looks pretty good before them


ah, but the question is , was that really a puranic portryal of gods ?..its an online version but i doubt its sanctity..in this case yes dkdm portrayal is better than the real deal, besides , i really have no clue about Vishnu/Krishna's raasleela & i am not qualified to judge it for others..but i am pretty aware of Shiv-Shakti equation & i find that more appealing..

If you read the above quoted question , it wouldnt be wrong to say that people are rooting for DKDM's version as in DKDM here becomes bigger than our original beliefs & original legends ( howsoever good or bad it be )..and to me that just sounds stupid..there is no way that a 'fictional' TV series could be elevated to that status..bigger than our own religion ?..beliefs?..its as good as accepting that i am a fool as in if i can accept DKDM to be bigger than our own scriptures then y not even write one's own scriptures ?..DKDM wouldnt be bigger than ur own scriptures..and then it reaches a point where u r not talking about Hindu scriptures anymore..these are the dangers of dilution ..loosing authenticity..then it feels as though, u have reached a point where there is no head nor tail..

So the best thing to do here is , if u enjoy DKDM more, enjoy it & enjoy it for what it is - "FICTION"
Edited by Quixotic5 - 11 years ago
983175 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
And as for the current Tulsi track, yes the real storyi s much more revolting but whats even more revolting is DKDM's inherent tendency to gloss over things..😔 ..they have ended up changing a very crucial part of the story & i am definitely not happy..😔..DKDM needs to snap out of its lala land..on second thoughts, that ship sailed long ago..🥱
Edited by Quixotic5 - 11 years ago
kaatayani thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Quixotic5


ah, but the question is , was that really a puranic portryal of gods ?..its an online version but i doubt its sanctity..in this case yes dkdm portrayal is better than the real deal, besides , i really have no clue about Vishnu/Krishna's raasleela & i am not qualified to judge it for others..but i am pretty aware of Shiv-Shakti equation & i find that more appealing..

If you read the above quoted question , it wouldnt be wrong to say that people are rooting for DKDM's version as in DKDM here becomes bigger than our original beliefs & original legends ( howsoever good or bad it be )..and to me that just sounds stupid..there is no way that a 'fictional' TV series could be elevated to that status..bigger than our own religion ?..beliefs?..its as good as accepting that i am a fool as in if i can accept DKDM to be bigger than our own scriptures then y not even write one's own scriptures ?..DKDM wouldnt be bigger than ur own scriptures..and then it reaches a point where u r not talking about Hindu scriptures anymore..these are the dangers of dilution ..loosing authenticity..then it feels as though, u have reached a point where there is no head nor tail..

So the best thing to do here is , if u enjoy DKDM more, enjoy it & enjoy it for what it is - FICTION !


for that matter I consider Purans as fictional as DKDM.. when I read stories like Narayan's, I ponder that Wud God do thus..?? Does not God means good and welfare of all..one who is equal to all..!!

since Ages man has followed scriptures or fiction according to what appeals to their minds... and secondly when speak of Original Beliefs.. where is this originality..?? distorted scriptures to suit a sectarian ideology?? As for DKDM..i believe that it only reflects change in the societal mindset..for undoubtedly it has dealt with the stories in a way where it seeks to look beyond sectarian beliefs.. point out the importance and interdependency in a simpler form... and we must remember our "Original" history with all religious movements, where people questioned the "Original Beliefs" and they simplified their notions to the masses.

Of course i will not accord DKDM the status of a movement..but i wont deny that their version is more sorted out and definitely appealing to a certain section...
983175 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: kaatayani


for that matter I consider Purans as fictional as DKDM.. when I read stories like Narayan's, I ponder that Wud God do thus..?? Does not God means good and welfare of all..one who is equal to all..!!

since Ages man has followed scriptures or fiction according to what appeals to their minds... and secondly when speak of Original Beliefs.. where is this originality..?? distorted scriptures to suit a sectarian ideology?? As for DKDM..i believe that it only reflects change in the societal mindset..for undoubtedly it has dealt with the stories in a way where it seeks to look beyond sectarian beliefs.. point out the importance and interdependency in a simpler form... and we must remember our "Original" history with all religious movements, where people questioned the "Original Beliefs" and they simplified their notions to the masses.

Of course i will not accord DKDM the status of a movement..but i wont deny that their version is more sorted out and definitely appealing to a certain section...


@ bold : That is extremely subjective .. its good that you can appreciate DKDM's cooked up versions..but u cant speak for others..what most people loved about DKDM was its marvellous Mahadev (Mohit ) & sort of technical aspect like BG n stuff (not to mention the romance of Shiv-Shakti,though again cooked up when original was even way better).. but if you ask people their opinion about DKDM's portrayal of our Gods & scriptures , its mostly negative..like i said before, the original stories had enough charm, beauty & mystic in them to captivate the audience..even in the current track , i dont see how DKDM portrayed Vishnu in a positive light , the only difference being , they chickened out of the real deal since there is a general perception that our victorianized Indian Mentality cant handle the raw deal..everything needs to be glossed over for us..but may be if they gave the audience a chance..🤔..however, i would still maintain that whatever DKDM is doing with our scriptures is more unsettling & obnoxious than the real Vishnu-Tulsi story..

As for the varying sectorian ideology, some people see it as inconsistent "truth" ,thereby questioning the truth..but i see it as the beauty of Hinduism..you see, i dont appreciate a lot of Vaishnava philosophy so i always have the option of choosing a god of my own choice & following it..only Hinduism allows it 😃..whoever we choose to worship , ultimately we are worshiping one single entity , one single god..that fact too has been explained in our scriptures😊..and as for which are the original scriptures, i believe that too is just a matter of systematically sorting out the authentic ones from the fake or exaggerated ones..

And as for DKDM CVs, they should have stayed loyal to the original stories..and if there happens to be more than one version of the story in our authentic scrptures , they could have stood by the versions in Shaiva or Shakta sector , since the show's focus is on Mahadev & then Shakti..but what is the point of bringing in a new DKDM version that is neither in Shaiva, Shakta or even Vaishanava versions??..😔..a "DKDM puran" ?..😕 🥱
Edited by Quixotic5 - 11 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".