Jallandar l Vrinda - The DKDM Mess - Page 2

nice post jaya. conpleatly agree with you.

Originally posted by: Kadamvari

loving a negative character or hating is based on actiong of the actor..me and jaya mam both love Rahukaal in Savitri far far more than Satya the hero only because of his acting and strong portrayal
(not talking abt other show here just giving example) but knowing he is complete evil his deed can't be justified but its a fiction

same way loving jalandhar for mohit's acting is ok but justifying his action?? NO
and then we have to remember its not a fiction show its mytho and creative liberty is justified when there is not enough information and also justified to present a story beautifully but downright changing whatever written in scripture and history for sake of entertainment
NO

I love krip suri dressed as rahukal, i dont even watch the serial lolz
edited

cvs had always shown women in bad light in dkdm whether it is adishakti or lakshmi ji and it is better not to comment on saraswati ji coz most of the time they don't show her only...the way dkdm has projected paro or adi shakti is simply pathetic ...when we hear the name the adi shakti the first thing which come to our mind is the mother of the universe,the most powerful but cvs has reduced her to a simple house wife who is only corcerned abt her husband and children...she kills the asur not for the welfare of this world but for the safety of her own children...and everytime she ask for forgiveness from her swami for attaining the adi shakti avataar ...this is the first show in indian television i think where it was shown that durga killed mahishasur only for the safety of her son kartikeya not for jagat kalyan...few months ago they showed the bhavan track and the ashok sundari marriage track in which they put all their efforts in ruining adi shakti's image...firstly adi shakti who is herself maya got trapped in maya and secondly pakriti breaking her own rules only for the welfare of her own daughter...disgusting and pathetic ...😡..then also when ganesh was beheaded by mahadev ,instead of admitting his own mistake mahadev blamed paro only for this by giving some rubbish explanation...here also they tried to show mahadev great by ruining adi shakti's image..now this pathetic jallu track...where adi shakti was shown getting kidnapped ...and now jallu is planing to use her as a weapon against mahadev...just nonsense..😡...cvs aurto ki image aur kitna girauge ?😡😡😡

Jaya..yeh aapne kya kar diya..!! 😆

My only irk is..the track which was supposed to be GOOD winning over EVIL..is turned into justification of EVIL doings..!!
Its also now.. "Does Jalandhar deserve to die"??

Jalandhar was EVIL..and he paid for his Karma..!!

Also disappointed with Vrinda's character..she was the same women who stood up against her father and others..for treating a women as an object (during marriage) and yest she was submissive..and shown to have no saying..!!
They changed her entire characterization after marriage..!!

It is a personal.choice to be very understanding of a woman abducter. But the cv pandering to that and showing crime against woman being justified in any shape is what is baffling. As u said Jaya..the next time a road aise romeo as much as gives you a dirty look..maybe you should shed a tear for he might be an affected soul with abandonment issues. In the meanwhile he Will continue his crime against u and women like you.

to me it is not only abduction that gives him the negative aura that I see...for the record I do love MR's acting skills...it is his excessively huge egocentric attitude... one minute he commands his guru to recede back ...and as soon as he sees that his guru will leave him he starts crying...one minute he declares his immense love for Vrinda...but next minute he does not even have enough time for the same woman to do a silly ritual. just for her sake...common Jalandhar...any gentleman would have humored his wife at this stage...he goes through all sorts of efforts to find out the weeknesses of Mahadev...and endures what many call humiliation from all the rishis and Parasuram, if this is not being conniving then what is I don't know...So far Vrinda is concerned...oh no !!!! is all I can say...today Vrinda's behavior was like that of a mother who cannot out of selfish love dare to accept that her son is wrong ...and in this course becomes the doom of her son herself. Possibly if Vrinda could have stood fast on her ground and not yielded in, the situation would have been different. I always believe that a women has the capacity to change anything given she has the desire to accept black as plain simple black rather than looking for shades of grey and white in it...unfortunately that is not always the case.

What I find absurd is that Sukracharya is blamed for Jallu's misdeeds...I think once we reach adulthood , we alone are responsible for our actions...Suku gave security, education and shelter to Jallu and even if he did it for ulterior motives , yet it is his greatness...

the so called strong woman vrinda who opposed against making her an object during marriage proposal even though she loved jal rastically changed and didn't utter a word when jal is treating parvati as an object?? and silently supporting him just because he said 2 words of love and said he doesn't have interest in parvati??
does vrinda deserve any sympathy after all these she is having ritual so that jal can manage to kil mahadev who did no harm to him??

Jaya di i have said about this to utkarsh but he is not interested in replying,😭 what to do😡