I don't understand why instead of just pretending that they haven't killed anyone, the Indian side would actually try not to kill anyone. There are plenty of innocent people just trying to go about their daily lives, without political agendas, the problem is that they have not been spared either for the past 30 years. Rather, there is a big misuse of power and use of excessive force on unarmed civillians. If the human rights violations could be avoided at least, it would be good because it's unnecessary to punish the general population. As for the current situation, I don't see why peaceful protesters are being targeted also. Even the seperatist political movements could be allowed in the democratic process. The fact that the armed forces haven't restrained themselves to fighting the militants and stone-pelters only but inflicting brutalities indiscriminately has only made the insurgency worse. BJP should also allow space for the ordinary people to manoeuvre instead of clamping down too hard on them unnecessarily. The articles have been revoked as per the wishes of the government, now they should allow for a peaceful backlash that is expected and not add to inflaming the situation by enabling atrocities. Also, having a political will or agenda should not be a crime (even if it is a Pak-sponsored one) in a democracy. The crime was militancy but the military oppression of locals for the past three decades has not worked. It strengthened the rebellion. Actually, the human rights situation has been so bad India might not be able to provide justice or fix it so while the world is now watching, should the U.N. be allowed to intervene?