Should commercial surrogacy be allowed?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#11

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

Noob!!! and what logical line of thought gets you to that conclusion 😆

Just admit it. 😆 That ghost line obviously.

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

#12

Originally posted by: ibnbatuta

Just admit it. 😆 That ghost line obviously.

😆😆

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#13

So India is the first country to legalize commercial surrogacy soon to legitimize both intra-and inter-country surrogacy.

India is the No1 Rent a Womb destination for whites for IVF and IVF with donor eggs.

India has more than 3200 fertility clinics.

White Jewish couples pay more than 40,000 USD for the entire procedure, while the surrogate mother just gets around 2000 USD.

Commercial surrogacy is now a 4 BILLION USD INDUSTRY. 65% of clients are foreign White skinned people.

40,000 surrogate babies are produced in India each year. The govt know who they are as they go out of India by AIR.

PM Vajpayee was the one who legalized commercial surrogacy in 2002.

IVF with anonymous egg donation is done in India.Egg donation is illegal in a most European countries.

Exploitation, extortion and ethical abuses in surrogacy trafficking are rampant and poor illiterate surrogate mothers are misused with impunity because there is no accountability of IVF centers.

Are we under any delusions that the poor women are nothing but baby factories? It's the doctors, middlemen and brokers who are making all the moolah.

Do the poor surrogates not undergo psychological stress? Women go through all sorts of mood swings and hormonal changes during pregnancy. Women who miscarry often get into deep depression. What then would be the mental state of a surrogate?

Edited by ibnbatuta - 10 years ago

Quote

373577

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#14

What happens if the surrogate mother refuses to part with the baby it gave birth to?

Quote

Mini

@iMini

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

#15

I might be immature and ill informed enough to ask this..but why does surrogacy even exist? Why can't people adopt children?

Quote

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: zorrro
What happens if the surrogate mother refuses to part with the baby it gave birth to?

I think she can't keep the baby. In almost all countries world over , the woman giving birth to a child is considered as the Child's legal mother.

In India Intended Parents are recognized as the legal parents from birth by the virtue of the fact that the Surrogate has CONTRACTED to give birth to the child for the commissioned Parents.

And I don't think she could do much. The people who run these fertility clinics are powerful people with muscle power too. And the law itself favours the commissioned parents without providing any provision to compensate the poor women suitably at the very least.

Edited by ibnbatuta - 10 years ago

Quote

1047050

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: iMini
I might be immature and ill informed enough to ask this..but why does surrogacy even exist? Why can't people adopt children?

Good question. Probably because they can. Through IVF and surrogacy, anyone can have a baby.

Quote

sudesh kumar

@qwertyesque

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

#18

Originally posted by: iMini
I might be immature and ill informed enough to ask this..but why does surrogacy even exist? Why can't people adopt children?

adopt!!? Why there is no genetic connexion.. surrogacy has atleast partial one!!!

Quote

373577

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: ibnbatuta

I think she can't keep the baby. In almost all countries world over , the woman giving birth to a child is considered as the Child's legal mother.

In adoption cases she would cease to be the legal mother.

In India Intended Parents are recognized as the legal parents from birth by the virtue of the fact that the Surrogate has CONTRACTED to give birth to the child for the commissioned Parents.
And I don't think she could do much. The people who run these fertility clinics are powerful people with muscle power too. And the law itself favours the commissioned parents without providing any provision to compensate the poor women suitably at the very least.
A contract is supposed to be a signed and informed consent so would have legal acceptance. I suppose the terms are clearly spelled out to all the parties and they proceed only when everyone consents.

Quote

1 2

Should commercial surrogacy be allowed? - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics