Aishwariya Rai in Racist Ad - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

103

Views

16.3k

Users

49

Likes

368

Frequent Posters

Sultan_Of_Swing thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 10 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: OrganizedChaos


It's just a perception like it was rightly pointed out. That the boy was black didn't even strike me until it was pointed out. That he was a small boy was what I noticed at first.


Even if we go with that, it still can be misinterpreted as oppression and child slavery both of which are still equally serious issues.

in a growing online world where every small message can reach millions in no time, it is high time celebrities and or their team review every single thing they shoot for. This is just not for Ash, it is something everyone must do.

P.S- On a separate note, as a person born in South India I find it extremely distasteful that a South Indian store would use such a racist image when most dravidian people to date, face prejudices about their skin colour and are on the receiving end of casual racism within their own country.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#22
The ad was in bad taste. 🤢

Kalyan often tries to show stars as royalty but this time it went too far.

It was good that activists protested against it. We have to discourage such mentality everywhere, especially in India.

This ad promotes both racism and slavery of a child.

mushqte thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#23

An advertisement by a leading jewellery brand featuring Aishwarya Rai Bachchan has been called out by a group of individuals, including the writer and feminist activist Farah Naqvi, for being "racist" and for depicting child labour. The ad in question appeared in a national newspaper on April 17, and features the actress posing in a jewelled costume while a child struggles to hold an umbrella over her.

The letter read, "We wish to convey our dismay at the concept of this advertisement, and that you have, perhaps unthinkingly, associated with such a regressive portrayal of a child to sell a product.

While advertisers routinely use fantasy images to sell products, they must surely desist from using images that condone, legitimise, normalise, or build desirable fantasy around slavery or servitude of any kind, including child slavery or child servitude. Further, the extremely fair colour of your skin (as projected in the advertisement) contrasted with the black skin of the slave-boy is obviously a deliberate creative' juxtaposition by the advertising agency, and insidiously racist."

Nishad Ramchandran, senior vice president, Digital Experience at Hansa Cequity believes that the ad is facing flak partially as a result of our own inadequacies. "For all their talk of empowerment, brands really go out and look for people's inadequacies and build products (around them). That said, ads like these are not always created with any malicious intent. It is when we (the audience) see it that we interpret it according to our own inadequacies. In this case, I would like to give the benefit of the doubt to the jewellers, that this wasn't the intent. Our interpretations of light and dark skin come into play here-we do have old hangovers of fairness being an advantage, and we read into ads like these based on our beliefs," he said.

Amer Jaleel, the national creative director of ad agency Lowe Lintas on the other hand, minces no words while condemning the ad. "I think the campaign is insensitive, not just on a human level, but also on a professional level. You can't create such an ad and then explain that you didn't imagine the gravity of the matter. When you are looking after a brand, it is almost dangerous to not take these values into consideration. Initially, audiences only consumed content. Today, they consume content and comment about it. When it comes to a brand, it is your job to understand what works and what doesn't. I think one can take creative liberties only in one's personal capacity."

Many other creative works have in the past, drawn ire for their "offensive" content. (See pictures above). Does that impinge on creative expression? Photographer Nrupen Madhvani doesn't think so, "I don't think there is anything artistic about this ad. It is in bad taste and it seems to be a deliberate PR exercise with a very clear agenda, which is to create a buzz around the brand. I don't think there is anything to do with freedom of expression here. I think the ad is politically incorrect, especially in a country that is still dealing with such issues. The intention seems deliberate and all I can question is that where is the conscience?"

While everyone is talking about the intention of the idea, Gopal MS wants to shift focus to the intent of the signatories. The creative director of communications agency Tailor, Gopal says, "I agree that the visual of the ad is in poor taste. But are they right in targeting Aishwarya Rai to highlight the issue? Would they do it if it was a male model? It is just another run of the mill ad. I think the creators of the ads are dumb. They are not sensitive to such issues. At times, being politically correct does infringe on the freedom of expression. Especially these days, when everyone seems to be over sensitive."

Meanwhile, we got an email from Aishwarya's publicist, responding to the open letter. It came along with a picture of the original photo shoot and read:

Dear Farah Naqvi, Nisha Agrawal, Enakshi Ganguly , Bharti Ali, Madhu Mehra, Shantha Sinha, Harsh Mander and Mridula Bajaj, On the onset we would like to thank you on drawing our attention to the observation of the perception of the advertisement. Here (above) is an attachment of the shot taken by somebody during the shoot. The final layout of the ad is entirely the prerogative of the creative team for a brand. However shall forward your article as a viewpoint that can be taken into consideration by the creative team of professional working on the brand visual communication.

http://www.asianage.com/bollywood/enslaved-creativity-557

Agree with the bold part.

Edited by mushqte - 10 years ago
IAmLuvBolly thumbnail
Visit Streak 750 Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 10 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: Sultan_Of_Swing

Reminds me of this ad that created a big uproar in Europe.

http://www.standard.co.uk/incoming/article9073983.ece/alternates/w620/dashazhukovasplit.jpg



Ohhh that is bad and bad. In this day and age how do these things get approved?


The Kardashians are idiots, all of them. When the 3 older sisters launched their clothing line they wanted to brand it KKK since that was their initials.



HarveySpecter thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: IAmLuvBolly



Well like you yourself said in your first post using a child in this context is bad enough. But then, was it just a coincidence that the boy ended up being that dark? Especially in the context of holding an umbrella for the very rich aristocratic fair skin looking Aishwarya?


I really don't know what Kalyan's marketing team was thinking?


It is art and like an artist can use any 'color' he wishes to, to make a painting appealing, the photographer or whoever put together the ad has full rights to use a person of any colour; white, black or whatever, as per his wish, since it's his/her own art.

I only wish people were more serious about real issues that blacks face than superficial ones like this.

I am surprised much muck is being raised about the colour when few care about the fact that he is only a child. #SHAME
ChannaMereya thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: OrganizedChaos


It is art and like an artist can use any 'color' he wishes to, to make a painting appealing, the photographer or whoever put together the ad has full rights to use a person of any colour; white, black or whatever, as per his wish, since it's his/her own art.

I only wish people were more serious about real issues that blacks face than superficial ones like this.

I am surprised much muck is being raised about the colour when few care about the fact that he is only a child. #SHAME

The color is issue a big issue
This isnt superfcial ages ago exploitation started because of color and that mentality is still rampant is what is the problem

mushqte thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#27
The child servitude depicted in the ad is definitely distasteful.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#28
Mushqte - you conveniently highlighted 2 parts that supported the ad though rest of the article condemns the ad. 😆

Organised Chaos - images and ads are powerful in influencing perceptions. Such ads feed racism.
They can't be justified in name of creative freedom. Ads are for public and hence need to be made responsibly.
Even if you leave the colour, still the child is portrayed as a slave here which is gross.

HarveySpecter thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: guess.wh0

While its entirely possible that she wasn't aware that the photo-shoot was going to be used in such as way as to promote slavery, its her cold, indifferent response that is disappointing.

" I didn't know, I don't care...will forward it to Kalyan."

She didn't condemn it or take a stand against it which most celebrities would. Extremely insensitive but then again she's always been a heartless old hag so nothing new.


That's not her quote.
642126 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: guess.wh0

While its entirely possible that she wasn't aware that the photo-shoot was going to be used in such as way as to promote slavery, its her cold, indifferent response that is disappointing.

" I didn't know, I don't care...will forward it to Kalyan."

She didn't condemn it or take a stand against it which most celebrities would. Extremely insensitive but then again she's always been a heartless old hag so nothing new.



Most celebs are not bothered in this regard.

They rather keep mum than take a stand.

These are multi crore deals for them. Will they stand by brand or affect their deals?

They have no social or moral responsibility.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".