Exploitation of employee or blackmail of employer? (Khobragade case) - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

402

Views

21.9k

Users

25

Likes

242

Frequent Posters

K.Universe. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#21
Genie, I read everything you wrote (mind you, you wrote quite a lot :) and absorbed what you have to say.

I will wait to hear more from the agencies here - if appropriate procedures were followed before, during and after arrest, then unfortunately, tautological as it may sound, that's that.
return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#22
To add the same treatment was meted out to Dominic Strauss-Kahn, although charges made against him were much more severe. Protocol followed was standard protocol when someone is suspected of crime.

I think the outrage is quite a bit over the top because this has been the standard protocol followed by USA, irrespective of which country the person is from or what their stature is. This wasn't a bias against India.

USA may try to rescue their diplomats abroad from arrests. However, in the past US diplomats have been arrested, detained, kidnapped etc. In those situations, USA has tried to negotiate release rather than retaliate. USA also has extradition treaties with many nations including India and has honored them.

The primary tool of diplomacy irrespective of situation is negotiations. However, I think withdrawing security and refusal to meet delegation is an acceptable form of showing displeasure before negotiation. Making up false allegations and making threats is crossing the line.

I don't think it is fair to expect USA to change its laws or its protocol. But it would be absolutely fair to expect USA to show more reciprocity in terms of applying laws of the host nations.
K.Universe. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

This wasn't a bias against India.



If someone is alleging that, they need to supply a motive.

If someone is not alleging that, they need to explain why according to them the US is treating this particular officer any differently (than they would treat other officers from other countries).
charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: K.Universe.



If someone is alleging that, they need to supply a motive.

I don't think anyone has insinuated towards this angle, yes as a nation with a friendly status , considering the severity of the allegations - the treatment meted on a diplomat irrespective of nationality was not appropriate.

If someone is not alleging that, they need to explain why according to them the US is treatin
g this particular officer any differently (than they would treat other officers from other countries).
I would sound like a broken record here , but because America doesn't have a universal labour laws for diplomats. It has been equally lenient to many nations for the same allegations in the past including in a case featuring a diplomat from Japan and another from UAE
. This is a very common , yet pitiable practice enjoyed by many nations all around and has an unspoken approach to it - "which America has also practiced". It's the double standards with how the big nation practices the standard procedure in it's own land and makes a mockery in many another.

Another difference- Vienna Convention - Though the diplomatic immunity doesn't not apply to consular duties, many feel legally the Indian Diplomat would and should have enjoyed this immunity. Her case is being defended on these grounds.



Hades - Kahn as you yourself mentioned committed a crime which was huge in it's magnitude so citing his example viz a viz this incident ( which was already under trial in the native nation) is a little too different. I doubt there was a different view from any of the International communities.
I would love to know how America has defended it's people who were charged with same misdemeanor in other countries say like Pakistan, India etc

In all the examples you mentioned American Govt rightfully defended their people even when the charges were as big as homicidal, going as far as proving aircraft to ship them off the countries. Wouldn't judge then why cannot India protest against the manhandling of it's official in any form as it likes. The steps it has taken are not unheard and has been championed by developed nations. The point to be noted is - India has not defended the diplomat's action all it is protesting is the tact - which not only drew International attention making it a prestige issue but which was an issue that could have easily been dealt with diplomatic channels.


I don't understand the usage of the term standardized procedures in context of diplomacy where the terms, treatment and rules vary depending on different degrees of friendliness.
Edited by charminggenie - 11 years ago
clars thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#25
Not sure many have read abt the deviyani arrest in the us which has upset india because of the way she was treated and hence india in retaliation has cancelled all special privileges given to the us diplomats in india

Do you think such a stand by india is justified ?
clars thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26
This is leading to a full on war between india and the us and i feel that us might now be even stricter while issuing visas to indians
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#27
This is a very complicated situation. I agree that Devyani was unable to pay an amount as big as 4500$ to her maid as her own salary is lesser than that,but I also don't agree that she should have broken the US law...
But
I'm assuming someone who was capable of becoming an IFS office was also capable of comprehending the terms of the contract she had signed. Secondly, it seems that Devyani owns two properties in the Adarsh Society in Mumbai which is part of a larger land scam which I am sure is worth crores, so it appears strange to me that our Government bureaucrats can afford and own super expensive apartments but claim they earn a certain amount and therefore cannot pay wages.

Thirdly my research states that once her domestic staff demanded the rightful amount that was due to her, a series of legal cases were filled against this poor woman and her family by this powerful bureaucrat and her husband and child were taken in police custody.

The crime was commited in the USA, an Indian court has no rulling over it, like it or not. Modern slavery, is what it is called !!!😊


souro thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: Vinzy

This is a very complicated situation. I agree that Devyani was unable to pay an amount as big as 4500$ to her maid as her own salary is lesser than that,but I also don't agree that she should have broken the US law...
Add the cost of food, lodging, to and fro airfare from India to US to whatever salary she was being given.

But
I'm assuming someone who was capable of becoming an IFS office was also capable of comprehending the terms of the contract she had signed. Secondly, it seems that Devyani owns two properties in the Adarsh Society in Mumbai which is part of a larger land scam which I am sure is worth crores, so it appears strange to me that our Government bureaucrats can afford and own super expensive apartments but claim they earn a certain amount and therefore cannot pay wages.
Let's not mix two issues. First of all we don't know whether she is corrupt. Secondly, even if she is involved in some kind of corruption within India it is India's internal matter, it's none of USA's business. Here it's not about whether she is corrupt or not, it's about an Indian diplomat being mistreated. Who that Indian diplomat is, is not relevant here. If a nation's diplomat is mistreated, it's an insult to the nation not a matter of that individual alone. And India is well within their rights to retaliate.

Thirdly my research states that once her domestic staff demanded the rightful amount that was due to her, a series of legal cases were filled against this poor woman and her family by this powerful bureaucrat and her husband and child were taken in police custody.
Your research? Since when did you take up investigative journalism?
Moreover, if the maid's family was taken into police custody and if it's proved that it was done wrongfully, I once again reiterate, it's India's internal matter, not USA's business.

The crime was commited in the USA, an Indian court has no rulling over it, like it or not. Modern slavery, is what it is called !!!😊
She didn't mistreat or abuse or physically harm the maid. She didn't confiscate her passport and turn the maid into a bonded labour. She didn't make the maid to work for free. She paid the maid what is affordable for an Indian employee drawing salary by Indian standard, which was much higher than what maids get in India but not as high as maids in US. And US would've done better to keep all that in mind and to handle this more sensitively since it involves a diplomat from another country.

373577 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: Vinzy

This is a very complicated situation. I agree that Devyani was unable to pay an amount as big as 4500$ to her maid as her own salary is lesser than that,but I also don't agree that she should have broken the US law...
how do you suggest she was to comply with the minimum wages law ? Sell all her property in India so that she could pay wages fixed by USA?
But
I'm assuming someone who was capable of becoming an IFS office was also capable of comprehending the terms of the contract she had signed. Secondly, it seems that Devyani owns two properties in the Adarsh Society in Mumbai which is part of a larger land scam which I am sure is worth crores, so it appears strange to me that our Government bureaucrats can afford and own super expensive apartments but claim they earn a certain amount and therefore cannot pay wages.
How many people in the world sell properties to pay wages 😆 salary earned at Indian rates, Property was bought at Indian rates , wages to be paid at US rates
Thirdly my research states that once her domestic staff demanded the rightful amount that was due to her, a series of legal cases were filled against this poor woman and her family by this powerful bureaucrat and her husband and child were taken in police custody.
How was that amount rightfully demanded? She had accepted the lesser pay before leaving for US but later slapped the exploitation charge on landing in US 😉

The crime was commited in the USA, an Indian court has no rulling over it, like it or not. Modern slavery, is what it is called !!!😊
If other countries start implementing their local rulings on US officers on their land imagine their plight. High time they did 😆


-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#30

Offtopic:
Devyani Khobragade, 39-years-old but looks not a day older than 20.. Could be a top contender for Big Boss season 8

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".