Gandhiji Vs Bhagat Singh - Page 30

Created

Last reply

Replies

345

Views

32.5k

Users

27

Likes

4

Frequent Posters

mermaid_QT thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: sareg

What exactly are we apologizing for here?

for quoting Einstein

Or

for not listening to Einstein?

I lost track in all the meandering there πŸ˜‰



1. for quoting einstein to avoid spam (i had to keep the basically are u guys done yetπŸ˜• post free of spam warning)

2. hence getting dragged into the conversation unintentionally
3. actually beginning to see the sharp contrast between einstein's creation of nuc and appreciation of non-violence
4. defending why it is not an out of place / lacklusture debate technique to quote others
5. meandering, misinterpreting some comments and defending some more..

6. for being an honest and genuine peace lover trying to restore peace..

lesson learnt - Spam may not always leave me laughting in the end, some could drag me in deep s*** πŸ˜†..

chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
haha, looks like we still seem to like running to the headmaster for approval everytime. wont buy a product unless it is endorsed, no? πŸ˜‰ good.

but first, a correction. ex-world chess champion Bobby Fischer's IQ is not 205, it's a mere 180. πŸ˜‰ contrast that with einstein's estimated IQ. though he never took any IQ test, scientists have tried to estimate the IQ of deceased personalities such as Mozart and Goethe by means of biographic data. The value estimated for einstein was between 160 and 180 (source: internet).

hmmm, solely on IQ terms, makes fischer smarter than einstein, and fischer had some pretty dumb ideas himself, didnt he? didnt he publicly exult over the attacks on WTC? As the son of of a jewish mother, did he not also use the term "dirty jews" as though it were a statement of fact (New York Daily News). hmmmm, higher IQ than einstein? πŸ˜‰

now, back to einstein, perhaps the greatest physicist/ scientist of the 20th century. same internet site as that being served up for our entertainment here has this to say in fine print later on:

"The moral influence (Gandhi) had on the conciously thinking human being of the entire civilized world will probably be much more lasting than it seems in our time with its overestimation of brutal violent forces."

hmmm, wrong, as we know today. we still seem to be caught up in brutal wars, arming ourselves to the teeth eerywhere, repudiating the pacifist ideologies that he had. 😊

then somewhere he also says: "It is my contention that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder". (quoted in Des McHale, Wisdom, London)

hmmm, is he caught up in some time warp of his own? at the least, did he not foresee the need for the Allies to go to war and kill? he could work out massive equations, but could not foresee things even though he lived right there in naziland for a while? hmmm πŸ˜›

from another source: "Einstein denounced World War I and after the war became an outspoken pacifist. But the rise of Nazism and the horrifying events of World War II forced him to reconsider his anti-war position. Concerned the Nazis were building an atomic bomb, he urged the United States to build one first. Six years later, when the bomb was dropped on civilians, Einstein openly regretted his action and became a champion of nuclear disarmament for the rest of his life.

at some point, he also says how coming up with his relativity theory was the biggest regret of his life because it led to the bomb.

hmmm, seems he was not always able to foresee things, great thinker that he was. also a waffler when it came to situations that did not lend themselves to precise theories and calculations.

later in 1939 (long after the letter to Gandhi in 1931 πŸ˜‰ ), writes a famous letter to President Franklin Roosevelt not long after the start of World War II that warns of the possibility of Germany's building an atomic bomb and urges nuclear research.

hmmm, so he has chucked his pacifist ideologies? what might he be thinking of gandi then? still want to meet him? πŸ˜›

on his other famous waffles- he ultimately rejected the gravitational constant he had come up with, only for us to find that today he was originally right and subsequently wrong. he started work on the Unified Field Theory in the late 1920s, but did not succeed.

will leave u with the quote, from einstein himself:

"One reason why mathematics enjoys special esteem, above all other sciences, is that its laws are absolutely certain and indisputable, while those of other sciences are to some extent debatable and in constant danger of being overthrown by newly discovered facts." Sidelights on Relativity

hmmmm, did we follow that? natural sciences such as economics, and social topics such as freedom, war, pacifism is not math. even in a field such as economics with some math, we have had Nobel Prize winners whose theories contradict each other. no way of knowing who is right, and who is wrong unless empirically based on limited data.

so seems like he waffled on important issues of war and pacifism, went back on forth at least on issues he was not an expert on, at times even on issues he was an expert on.

like they say, a little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing. πŸ˜‰ when we quote to endorse, we might want to offer the entire context and not just put it out there as a newspaper clipping. πŸ˜‰ we just might want to also offer our interpretation of that quote. perhaps what really distinguishes the newspaper delivery boy from the "thinking guy". πŸ˜‰

qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: chatbuster

haha, looks like we still seem to like running to the headmaster for approval everytime. wont buy a product unless it is endorsed, no? πŸ˜‰ good.

but first, a correction. ex-world chess champion Bobby Fischer's IQ is not 205, it's a mere 180. πŸ˜‰ contrast that with einstein's estimated IQ. though he never took any IQ test, scientists have tried to estimate the IQ of deceased personalities such as Mozart and Goethe by means of biographic data. The value estimated for einstein was between 160 and 180 (source: internet).

hmmm, solely on IQ terms, makes fischer smarter than einstein, and fischer had some pretty dumb ideas himself, didnt he? didnt he publicly exult over the attacks on WTC? As the son of of a jewish mother, did he not also use the term "dirty jews" as though it were a statement of fact (New York Daily News). hmmmm, higher IQ than einstein? πŸ˜‰

now, back to einstein, perhaps the greatest physicist/ scientist of the 20th century. same internet site as that being served up for our entertainment here has this to say in fine print later on:

"The moral influence (Gandhi) had on the conciously thinking human being of the entire civilized world will probably be much more lasting than it seems in our time with its overestimation of brutal violent forces."

hmmm, wrong, as we know today. we still seem to be caught up in brutal wars, arming ourselves to the teeth eerywhere, repudiating the pacifist ideologies that he had. 😊

then somewhere he also says: "It is my contention that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder". (quoted in Des McHale, Wisdom, London)

hmmm, is he caught up in some time warp of his own? at the least, did he not foresee the need for the Allies to go to war and kill? he could work out massive equations, but could not foresee things even though he lived right there in naziland for a while? hmmm πŸ˜›

from another source: "Einstein denounced World War I and after the war became an outspoken pacifist. But the rise of Nazism and the horrifying events of World War II forced him to reconsider his anti-war position. Concerned the Nazis were building an atomic bomb, he urged the United States to build one first. Six years later, when the bomb was dropped on civilians, Einstein openly regretted his action and became a champion of nuclear disarmament for the rest of his life.

at some point, he also says how coming up with his relativity theory was the biggest regret of his life because it led to the bomb.

hmmm, seems he was not always able to foresee things, great thinker that he was. also a waffler when it came to situations that did not lend themselves to precise theories and calculations.

later in 1939 (long after the letter to Gandhi in 1931 πŸ˜‰ ), writes a famous letter to President Franklin Roosevelt not long after the start of World War II that warns of the possibility of Germany's building an atomic bomb and urges nuclear research.

hmmm, so he has chucked his pacifist ideologies? what might he be thinking of gandi then? still want to meet him? πŸ˜›

on his other famous waffles- he ultimately rejected the gravitational constant he had come up with, only for us to find that today he was originally right and subsequently wrong. he started work on the Unified Field Theory in the late 1920s, but did not succeed.

will leave u with the quote, from einstein himself:

"One reason why mathematics enjoys special esteem, above all other sciences, is that its laws are absolutely certain and indisputable, while those of other sciences are to some extent debatable and in constant danger of being overthrown by newly discovered facts." Sidelights on Relativity

hmmmm, did we follow that? natural sciences such as economics, and social topics such as freedom, war, pacifism is not math. even in a field such as economics with some math, we have had Nobel Prize winners whose theories contradict each other. no way of knowing who is right, and who is wrong unless empirically based on limited data.

so seems like he waffled on important issues of war and pacifism, went back on forth at least on issues he was not an expert on, at times even on issues he was an expert on.

like they say, a little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing. πŸ˜‰ when we quote to endorse, we might want to offer the entire context and not just put it out there as a newspaper clipping. πŸ˜‰ we just might want to also offer our interpretation of that quote. perhaps what really distinguishes the newspaper delivery boy from the "thinking guy". πŸ˜‰

First of all IQ changes with time So if fisher was 180 (he fell from 205 to 180 in a dayπŸ˜†) in twenty years he is around 80 unless he is solving sudoku to maintain status quo...πŸ˜†

Probably Einstein was talking about you when he saidπŸ˜†

Generations to come, it may be, will scarcely believe that such a one, as this, ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth. β€” Albert Einstein

Economics and Social topics are natural sciences!!!?? whats their habitat?now I know you defy Gandhi and always talk about the pot - are you smoking one right now?πŸ˜†

Lastly (for reviving the perfectly dead thread), if you want we can talk to the mods make a sacred thread out of this thread for you to wear....πŸ˜†.. dont forget to do the daily Sandhya snaan.. πŸ˜†πŸ˜†.. if you are born brahmin live like one.. so if you are born debater live like one...πŸ˜†

Edited by qwertyesque - 18 years ago
chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: sareg

So you did not hold Bhagat Singh as a leader(those who are not leaders are followers. you kind of seem to be agreeing with Qwerty on the also rans part now), but dont even want Gandhiji, well then they you are talking about a rudderless ship there

If you wanted Gandhiji, but with different qualities, you perhaps are doing monday-morning quarterbacking there, which is too much theory and no practicality, you take a person for who is for better or worser, If you want to complain about Gandhiji's leadership then you need to come up with someone who you claim to be a leader in that timeframe, till that point complaining about him equates to asking for a 5 course meal when all you have a dal-chapatiπŸ˜‰

Till that point this discussion becomes Gandhiji or no-one and you seem to be on the side of no-one, and in this debate there is no side for no-one, and I am sorry to tell you, fictional events are good in dreams, but in real life you need a person to debate uponπŸ˜‰

oh so sorry i missed thisπŸ˜‰ Sorry for being tardy nowπŸ˜›

well, you are misreading here. i would not choose leaders for their principles alone. what to do? commoners like me do need to think of pocket-book and other practical issues na, cant wander around for 30-years looking for promised manna and principles aloneπŸ˜‰

well, if u're making me pick, then i would hold Bhagat Singh above Gandhi. couple of things here- we can talk about leadership and we can talk about methodology. Bhagat Singh was a more inspiring person, showed us the country is worth sacrificng for, and gave the rallying cry. Gandhi took eternity to implement ideas borrowed from the sages before. leaders bring inspiration, motivation and passion, followers implementπŸ˜‰ In terms of methodology, Gandhi chose a different method but like just said there was nothing new there unless u're the type who's never read the scriptures and thinks Deepak Chopra came up with everyting on his own. πŸ˜‰also, the fact that his method conveniently paid off when the british were beginning to bleed makes it highly suspect. net, in terms of method, the brits (via the germans) did it to themseves. gandhi wld have gone on for another zillion years if he could have, like he happily wasπŸ˜›

ironical isnt it that institutional congress politics turned it the other way around and thought Gandhi was the leader? that too after he left a mess we're still been trying to clean up? bad, very badπŸ˜›

chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: qwertyesque

First of all IQ changes with time So if fisher was 180 (he fell from 205 to 180 in a dayπŸ˜†) in twenty years he is around 80 unless he is solving sudoku to maintain status quo...πŸ˜†

Probably Einstein was talking about you when he saidπŸ˜†

Generations to come, it may be, will scarcely believe that such a one, as this, ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth. β€” Albert Einstein

Economics and Social topics are natural sciences!!!?? whats their habitat?now I know you defy Gandhi and always talk about the pot - are you smoking one right now?πŸ˜†

Lastly (for reviving the perfectly dead thread), if you want we can talk to the mods make a sacred thread out of this thread for you to wear....πŸ˜†.. dont forget to do the daily Sandhya snaan.. πŸ˜†πŸ˜†.. if you are born brahmin live like one.. so if you are born debater live like one...πŸ˜†

oops, blooper. 😳 but nothing in your humor (?) changes the point. the point about social/ soft sciences remains unless you are challenging that. are you?πŸ˜›

on the question of IQ, the comparison of fischer and einstein are both from current-day estimates and methodologies. they're not from different methodologies. but wonder if u actually understand that?😊

and btw, how about something from you other than- gandhi is great, he had novel ideas, he got us freedom because of his ideology, einstein (when he was being pacifist) liked him, and some funnies?πŸ˜‰πŸ˜†

lemme know if anything of substance was missed.πŸ˜›

ps. thanks for giving me typos and grammar as legit ways to deride when there's nothing else to fall back on.πŸ˜† there's a saying about falling on ur own sword, isnt there? πŸ˜†

Edited by chatbuster - 18 years ago
souro thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: chatbuster

gandhi wld have gone on for another zillion years if he could have, like he happily wasπŸ˜›

Well why wouldn't he, he was getting all expenses paid holiday trips to London wasn't he. πŸ˜† So much for thinking about the starving millions. πŸ˜‰

Sorry for interrupting, please continue.

chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: souro

Well why wouldn't he, he was getting all expenses paid holiday trips to London wasn't he. πŸ˜† So much for thinking about the starving millions. πŸ˜‰

Sorry for interrupting, please continue.

true. some folks do love those "phoren" trips, dont they?πŸ˜†

earlier, someone mentioned he was not doing his stuff out of "pride". hmmm, pride's a very close cousin of "ego" or "self". wonder what his holding his personal peeves and principles above the country's was if not a manifestation of that "self".😊

qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: chatbuster

oops, blooper. 😳 but nothing in your humor (?) changes the point. the point about social/ soft sciences is there such a term or are you building your lexicon as we go on?πŸ˜† remains unless you are challenging that. are you?πŸ˜›

on the question of IQ, the comparison of fischer and einstein are both from current-day estimates ok and u telling me fischer was at kaplan giving a IQ test!!!πŸ˜†and methodologies. they're not from different methodologies. but wonder if u actually understand that?😊... you are like a moving industry you manufacture as you express... you make words ideas... thats greatπŸ˜†

and btw, how about something from you other than- gandhi is great, he had novel ideas, he got us freedom because of his ideology, einstein (when he was being pacifist) liked him, and some funnies?πŸ˜‰πŸ˜†

lemme know if anything of substance was missed.πŸ˜› Where was the substance?πŸ˜‰

ps. thanks for giving me typos and grammar as legit ways to deride when there's nothing else to fall back on not really its the first thing that you see remember the presentation v/s content high-flown talk ...???.πŸ˜† there's a saying about falling on ur own sword, isnt there? πŸ˜†

chatbuster thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

what term buddy? lemme know. will clarifyπŸ˜‰ and just some random chip-shots again? cant we do better?πŸ˜†

so you see, i'd be happy being a good boy too and running off to the headmaster every time i need to think. except here, i dont know which headmaster we are talking about πŸ˜›- the einstein who thought there is no gravitational constant, or the one who thought there was; one who writes a letter to gandhi in 1931 when he's a pacifist or one who urges nuclear weapons in 1939; one who finds his first wife better or the second one? oops, sorry again. but when we bring character witnesses, we gotta look at the entire evidence and their thinking, no?πŸ˜‰ when we waffle, we cant be sure, can we?😊

btw, still looking for that one substantial postπŸ˜† as for the funnies, how about leaving it to the jay lenos and the real comics who are actualy good with those? πŸ˜†

Edited by chatbuster - 18 years ago
qwertyesque thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago

Originally posted by: chatbuster

what term buddy? lemme know. will clarifyπŸ˜‰ and just some random chip-shots again? cant we do better?πŸ˜†

so you see, i'd be happy being a good boy too and running off to the headmaster every time i need to think. except here, i dont know which headmaster we are talking about πŸ˜›- the einstein who thought there is no gravitational constant, or the one who thought there was; one who writes a letter to gandhi in 1931 when he's a pacifist or one who urges nuclear weapons in 1939; one who finds his first wife better or the second one? oops, sorry again. but when we bring character witnesses, we gotta look at the entire evidence and their thinking, no?πŸ˜‰ when we waffle, we cant be sure, can we?😊

btw, still looking for that one substantial postπŸ˜† as for the funnies, how about leaving it to the jay lenos and the real comics who are actualy good with those? πŸ˜†

nvmd... americans can create their own idiotic terminologies i think

Edited by qwertyesque - 18 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".