Originally posted by: persistence
Not to start anything😳, but what exactly is off about the comment from II section? The person has a point -- character is just as important if not more than talent both inside and out in the "real world". I once found a note in a fortune cookie😳, ok I know funny source😆, but was cool - It said, "Talent will take you to the top, but it is character that will keep you from falling." I think character should be taken into consideration even if it is a singing show... people often complain about actors/actresses/ and what not for not setting a good example. Regardless, kids and older people do idolize "idols"... why not pick an idol who is worth idolizing then, esp when people have a choice to make someone an idol? PS. My question is intended for WA (though, you are welcome to reply RTH😊). WA, howcome the comment upset you? or was it just the little kids part... perhaps, t he poster intended to make an either or comment -- the or part is missing, considering either is there.😆 and the comment wasn't meant to be personal. 😳 It's also possible that people who like 'yashraj'.. (by the way, why is he so controversial? Other than the he let his dad beg in front of judges -- he wasn't the typical filmi hero, to say "nahin babuji; aap in judges ke saamne nahin gidgrayege'😆 --- do you think movies have set up an expectation about how people should act in certain situations?😊) are only doing so 'cause they don't want one act to define the person. Or that they, like me, like fighting for the underdog, looking at the situation from his/her perspective, even though they don't agree with someone's misguided/disgusting actions. Remember, Angad?😆 Persy
I cannot speak on behalf of Ajnu or anyone else here. However, here are my problems with the post. Yes, that is a relevant point that talent and character both are vital. But that is where the relevance of the post ends. Upon reading the thread, none of the Yashraj supporters were supporting, encouraging or appreciating his alleged 'bad attitude'. Everyone seemed to have a pretty decent understanding of what 'character' and were in no way confused between character attributes.
In reality it seems that support for Yashraj was due to the fact that he is immensely talented and should not be disregarded due to hi alleged 'attitude' problem/his attitude is not that bad that it overshadows his singing, his character has been misunderstood or that we are not in a position to make hasty judgments on character.
So my biggest beef with this post is the allegation that just because others are supporting Yashraj - they are imbecilic school children or that they have no idea what character is. Its a BS argument and ironically reflective of 'bad attitude' towards other members as well as 'stereotypical attitude' towards school kids.
If the person really wants to critique Yashraj on his character - they ought to not lash out at the intellect of members but
1) Illustrate that Yashraj's attitude is not misunderstood or hastily judged, and that his character is heavily marred due to it
2) That his character and attitude are so poor that they have no hope for improvement and completely overshadow his talent to the point of negligibility.
I will not mention the usage of "........" as punctuations, the elementary school spelling errors and the utter lack of structure because that would be English nazism.
(PS: Ironically, I have to admit, I have been guilty of such argument and have held (still hold) very strong prejudices against kids on the internet - not very mature of me at all)