'Physical Needs' - Can it be justified always?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

3365

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#121

Originally posted by: Gauri_3
Pretty soon, for all IFians - or te sexually active ones only, it would benext to impossible toengage in sex w/o thinking of these preachy yet twisted topics floating around😆

"quenching the thirst"

"Physical need does not want to listen to logic"

"how long to wait"

"best medium to quench the thirst"

geez 😆reads like dada kondkey movie titles 😆

🤣 🤣

Quote

Believe

@-Believe-

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#122

Originally posted by: boredgirl
EVEERYONE PLEASE CLEAN YOURSELF AND POST ON MY BATHNG HABITS TOPIC :)

You mean before or after 'Physical need' post...😛😉

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

461339

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#123

Physical needs?, If you just want quick release, and you don't have a partner, then just masturbate - guys can perform the five knucle shuffle routine, whilst the girls can pop down to their local grocery store, and find any easy to fit item of their choice... no risk of stds either.

Quote

463079

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#124

Originally posted by: Emptiness
Physical needs?, If you just want quick release, and you don't have a partner, then just masturbate - guys can perform the five knucle shuffle routine, whilst the girls can pop down to their local grocery store, and find any easy to fit item of their choice... no risk of stds either.

If these 'options' could satisfy the sensations of desire which rushes through young veins ...then there would never be this question in the first place.

Quote

463523

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#125

if u got to justify it, then u're doing something wrong. idea is to get the boss to give u a raise without your asking😉

Quote

karandel_2008

@karandel_2008

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

#126

Regarding justification, it reminds me what one of my friend told me about sex, love and breaking traffic rules: "sochne waale sochte hain, ki kya galat aur sahi, and karne waale bus karte hain" 😉

Even though, sometimes, I myself think a lot on some issues, in my opinion there should be a balance between doing things and spending time on justifying things. What say?

Also the word sex reminds me what Vishal Bharadwaj said recently " It's sad. Our society is regressing so much that we fear to even utter the word 'sex'. And this is why India is the worst AIDS-affected country in the world. The people on the board who have objected to the word should remember they are in this world because of sex."

link

Edited by karandel_2008 - 15 years ago

Quote

casper

@Roadrunnerz

Voyager

Posted: 15 years ago

#127

Originally posted by: karandel_2008
The people on the board who have objected to the word should remember they are in this world because of sex."

Oh yeah unless one can lay claim of coming into the world like Jesus , draupadi, pandavas , kauravas etc 😆

Quote

463079

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#128

Physical needs become a reality when children reach their teenage.

Its such a need, that it has become a billion dollar business for many sex related industries.

THIS MIGHT ALARM MANY PEOPLE, BUT ACCORDING TO A STUDY, 80% OF ALL po*nOGRAPHIC MOVIES HAVE CHILDREN UNDER 16 AS THEIR AUDIENCE!

Many statistics claim that its actually below 15 (or 15 being the mean, with 2 years +/-). The main spectators are male. Female are not too far behind aswell.

I highly recommend marriage between teens. Looking at the west and sexual practices which start well below teenhood these days. Its the best idea to allow teen marriages. I think they are well aware of the situation.

Parents or government should provide opportunities for such marriages to sustain economically aswell. I suggest 15 being the perfect matrimonial age.

Quote

200467

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#129

Originally posted by: Crimson_Sky
Physical needs become a reality when children reach their teenage.

Its such a need, that it has become a billion dollar business for many sex related industries.

THIS MIGHT ALARM MANY PEOPLE, BUT ACCORDING TO A STUDY, 80% OF ALL po*nOGRAPHIC MOVIES HAVE CHILDREN UNDER 16 AS THEIR AUDIENCE!

Many statistics claim that its actually below 15 (or 15 being the mean, with 2 years +/-). The main spectators are male. Female are not too far behind aswell.

I highly recommend marriage between teens. Looking at the west and sexual practices which start well below teenhood these days. Its the best idea to allow teen marriages. I think they are well aware of the situation.

Parents or government should provide opportunities for such marriages to sustain economically aswell. I suggest 15 being the perfect matrimonial age.

I disagree with this suggestion. Marriage is not ONLY about sex. Agreed that sex plays a very important role in a marriage but it will be a disaster if the whole marriage is based on the idea of getting an outlet for the pent up sexual energy.

Additionally, one may not want to settle down for life with those they want to have a purely physical relationship with. If abstaining is such a monumental task for some, they should consider safe sex with willing partners/dates. Getting married at a tender age solely for getting banged - ugh.

Quote

463079

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#130

Ofcourse, you can disagree Gauri 😊.

But I think that is a solution to many of the problems facing the west. I have lived almost all my life in Europe, and can see how kids are developing fast around the world. They understand love and the responsibilities that come with it. They become helpless and victim to their own desires and sex impluse. The problem is so huge that in some of the European countries they are already pondering on the possibilities of having teen marriages accepted in the society.

There are teens who want to take up responsibilities. It is not a new concept. India (specially bengol) had this custom of having their son gotten married when he crossed 15, and the daughter when she crossed 12. However, I dont think it should be that much open. Atleast the girl should be 14+ before marriage. And the boy around 16 (i.e. 15+). It has worked in India before very successfully. And those times were much more respectable and economically stronger (when we talk about dispersion of wealth) in India. (I am not talking about the GDP here).

Let us face it. Children dont remain so much a child when they long for sexual pleasures. They do realise (8 out of 10 times) the responsibilities associated with marriage. And they want to accept that with a pure heart.

It shouldnt be forcing on them. But it shouldnt be made a taboo (as is being done these days). If a teen wants to marry, and are serious, then their relationship should be considered!

I think (my POV), that it will be successful.

As for responsibilities, I am very confident that these teens will fulfill their responsibilities in a much better way than most of the SO CALLED matured men and women are fulfilling these days. Everything cannot be measured by money and career. There are somethings that are beyond it.

And I feel, education, money, career and morality....all will benefit by this move.

Quote

1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 27

'Physical Needs' - Can it be justified always? - Page 13

Related Topics

Explore Topics