Thoughts on the Final Result - Page 8

Originally posted by: Elephunk

1.Shakit deserved to win

2. People who say dharmesh is best in hip hop, he got beat in his own style POPPING by prince

3. Even if dharmesh fans still think he is best in popping or other type
of hip hop, then shakti is the best in contemporary.

4. DID 2 season is over, accept the fact and congratulate the winner.

OK I m a binny fan.. but I won't say tht it has been unfair victory! She said it herself that she want a girl to win 😊

Shakti has been very consistent in every performance she gave and if it's not her who deserves this award then I think none of the dancers are good enough either..
She was star in every dance form she gave and outshone everyone in competitions..
I agree tht Dharmesh is awesome in hip hop or popping, But in order to be a dancing star you have to be all rounder( as i would say) and he failed in many! 👎🏼
SO first time, I am happy with the result of reality show! 😊
I won't discriminate or attack geeta, even though Binny was in her team cauz she might have done whatever she can, so learn to appreciate it instead of criticizing someone!

I like the way you presented your post. So am not going to criticize your line of thought, because it is neither ridiculous, nor downright insulting like some of the "members' " ones here are!


But I've got to comment on a few things I beg to differ from. By huge miles indeed!

1. Just like you can say the undeserving contestant won, we can say the DESERVING contestant won. You cannot put a 'period' there just to state it as an absolute fact. Because in your opinion she wasn't deserving, does NOT mean she wasn't. She's won by far the most performance of the day awards, she's won the performance of the season award, she's won Remo's heart not being in his team, got the MJ band, she's NEVER had a weak performance whilst ALL the other contestants have had one or numerous weak performances. So, please, don't go labeling a contestant as undeserving unless you CAN backup your opinion by some valid proof of why you say it. Moreover, do NOT please bring up the versatility point. The last few weeks have proven well and hard who's versatile and who's not, even in classical forms.

2. NO and Yes. I do not believe Dharmesh has been treated unfairly. What I do believe is that all the others have been treated unfairly in front of him. If unfair treatment had not been made, Amar would still be in the show, so would have Kruti remained till the finale. Dharmesh has been, by far, the ONLY contestant who's had the MOST stage time, most drama, and most time to "connect" to the audience. If they (creatives) or they (audience), either system you believe in, STILL think he does NOT deserve to win, they're only ever right!


One more thing. Salman's win was still unexpected last year. Mayuresh had topped him much better and by far more votes I presume, than Dharmesh has had over Shakti. In Janta ki Kasauti, Salman had had to nearly go once. How do you explain HIS win then? I think it's only fair to say that if it was rigged this season, it was last season 2. Also, either way, as much as I may try and prove otherwise since I don't like Salman one bit, but the fact remains that he was the winner.

The fact remains that Shakti IS the winner. Period! And I backed up ALL my arguments!

Originally posted by: sneha0601

I like the way you presented your post. So am not going to criticize your line of thought, because it is neither ridiculous, nor downright insulting like some of the "members' " ones here are!


But I've got to comment on a few things I beg to differ from. By huge miles indeed!

1. Just like you can say the undeserving contestant won, we can say the DESERVING contestant won. You cannot put a 'period' there just to state it as an absolute fact. Because in your opinion she wasn't deserving, does NOT mean she wasn't. She's won by far the most performance of the day awards, she's won the performance of the season award, she's won Remo's heart not being in his team, got the MJ band, she's NEVER had a weak performance whilst ALL the other contestants have had one or numerous weak performances. So, please, don't go labeling a contestant as undeserving unless you CAN backup your opinion by some valid proof of why you say it. Moreover, do NOT please bring up the versatility point. The last few weeks have proven well and hard who's versatile and who's not, even in classical forms.

2. NO and Yes. I do not believe Dharmesh has been treated unfairly. What I do believe is that all the others have been treated unfairly in front of him. If unfair treatment had not been made, Amar would still be in the show, so would have Kruti remained till the finale. Dharmesh has been, by far, the ONLY contestant who's had the MOST stage time, most drama, and most time to "connect" to the audience. If they (creatives) or they (audience), either system you believe in, STILL think he does NOT deserve to win, they're only ever right!


One more thing. Salman's win was still unexpected last year. Mayuresh had topped him much better and by far more votes I presume, than Dharmesh has had over Shakti. In Janta ki Kasauti, Salman had had to nearly go once. How do you explain HIS win then? I think it's only fair to say that if it was rigged this season, it was last season 2. Also, either way, as much as I may try and prove otherwise since I don't like Salman one bit, but the fact remains that he was the winner.

The fact remains that Shakti IS the winner. Period! And I backed up ALL my arguments!

Mentor who has 2 finalists is always at disadvantage. Vote got split. I was damn sure Shakti would win. She was a deserving winner among 4. If she had not won then it would be injustice specially when she won so many POTD, MJ band etc. DID is very much fair, both year the best dancer won, both Shalti and Salman were the highest POTD winner in respective season. In judges round Salman never came on Junta ki Kasauti and Shakti's case was also almost same.

I'm in Australia. DID shows are on the same concept as so you think you can dance which is a Aussie version. However when it comes to the real winners I believe the process of the public voting is true here and fairly processed but after watching DID2 I feel that this show is throughly rigged and so predictable. Zee does what it wants so audience votes are only for the show purpose. The winner is finalized by zee not the audience. This is what I feel as being a NRI. Dharmesh was a far better contestant and by all means should have won. Those who keep on saying this is a wrong that he lost it's true. I feel the same. By all fairness I must also include that Australia and Usa are very very fair with the voting system. India has always has a superficial system and will always remain corrupt weither it's for dancing stars or for their polticians. CORRUPTION n bad politics is the right word for this type of wrong decisions. I just feel sorry for Dharmesh. You are always the winner and will be. I know most NRIs will agree with what I have felt and described. :) with no offence to anyone out there. Purely written from my observation and feelings. :)

I've been reading a lot of comments about how Dharmesh was the best and how the voting system is rigged, some also commented on India being corrupt as a whole. Personally I think that bashing the country and the channel is immature and unless you have 100% proof of any injustice from the channel's side please refrain from questioning their integrety.

Coming to who deserved to win, lets compare.

For the first 4 weeks Shakti did contemporary style of dancing and won 3/4 POD. She then ventured into semi classical and did everything technically correct and great expressions. It wasn't an exceptional performance but it was still good, not week. Then she did bollywood/freestyle and that was also good, not exceptional but not week. Then Pasa Doble .... great performance and POD award as well. Then Hip-pop with Jack and another POD for it. She then did the Avatar act and won another POD. She also performed other styles like lyrical Hip-pop, locking-popping, Old school, Kathak, Modern ballet, Bhangra, Salsa and Rumba with Sushant from Pavitra Ristha and several other styles that I do not remember. After the first 4 weeks she did contemporary only 2 other times .... once with punit and then the dora dora bagha bagha act when she got MJ band.
For her master's best round last Saturday she gave an exceptional performance on the song miley sur mera tumhara ............. with such versatality, hardwork and exceptional performances how is she not deserving????????????

In comparision Dharmesh, though a good dancer and hard worker, was only able to give exceptional performances in his style of dancing and everything else he did was pretty much average or just good, sometimes even week.
Here's a list of his performances in other styles of dancing:-

His Salsa with Binny and Kishore .... onlu Binny stood out in that act, though Kishore and Dharmesh provided good support.
His ariel act on the music of Black was good and difficult but in performing those stunts all three let go of their expressions and the act lost it's magic, a fact that was noticed by the other 2 masters but defended by geeta maa.
His folk dance, when he got eliminated ..... the fact that he was eliminated in that episode says it all.
His contemporary act with Amrita .... technically incorrect and if not for excellent performance by Amrita totally forgettable.
His Ariel act with Binny .... very basic, commented upon by both masters as waste of prop .... defended by geeta maa as only 1 week to prepare we did the best we could (as if other contestants get 1 year to prepare for each act)
His duet with Binny when Arshard Warsi and Dia Mirza were celebrity guests was very good and also got POD.
His act with German Wheel prop/freestyle dance was good, not exceptional. A lot more could have been done.
His act with Siddesh from DID 1 was very good and got POD.
His master's challange from Terrence Lewis .... street jaaz and mime .... hardly and jaaz but good mime ..... again a good performance but nothing outstanding.
His ganpati act where his broke a bunch of lights on his hands and head ..... the dance portion during that act were average though he did maintain his energy levels very high throughout the performance.
His master's best round was just a repeat of all he has already done, nothing new ....

The fact remains that no doubt that Dharmesh is a very good dancer and a very hard worker and he definitely deserves success in life but no one can dispute that fact that out of all his performances in DID the only ones that stood out were in his stlye of dance (hip-pop) and all his foreys into other styles were either good or average nothing that stood out.


At the end of the day guys ........ It's a game and lets not let it affect our lives anymore. The winner has benn declared and no amount of discssion can change that so please be happy if not for the winner then for yourselves and do not question anyone's intergrity and hard work. Do not bash a country or go into political details.

Originally posted by: Elephunk

1.Shakit deserved to win

2. People who say dharmesh is best in hip hop, he got beat in his own style POPPING by prince

3. Even if dharmesh fans still think he is best in popping or other type
of hip hop, then shakti is the best in contemporary.

4. DID 2 season is over, accept the fact and congratulate the winner.

Popping = Hip-Hop? 😆 Hip-Hop is a lot more broader than popping. And last time I checked, popping was also Prince's style. And I think it's very debatable who performed better.


Dharmesh is the best at hip-hop. Not popping. That's being too specific. He is the best at hip-hop hands down. Listen to what Remo or Terrence have been saying all season. While Shakti? Contemporary? Sorry, but others have done contemporary as well. And I'm using season DID 1 contestants too. Jai for example. He could do contemporary as well or better. So Dharmesh's Hip-Hop is the best ever on DID. While Shakti's contemporary? No.

Originally posted by: joyce_k

I totally agree, Dharmesh is much better, he deserved to be no. 1, sadly janta ne last minute pe dhoka de diya. Anyway i am sure he is gonna rock in the future hope to see him bringing lots more happiness to his parents. And i totally agree that amu was lot better, i hope to see these two more n more...

Exactly.

I don't even like Amrita. I like Shakti way more. But I have to admit she could dance better, in many aspects. It's unfortunate I think both were in Gita's group. That ultimately doomed them.