Originally posted by: temperance12
Oh, one of the kings is being discussed. It's dangerous grounds because the king has lots of followers?
But invoking my constitutional right to free speech here?.
The case is still in trial, but what I don't appreciate is the delay tactics played by the defence - either in the name of his films or his heath; there is always some reason. I do not like the fact that it's been nearly 10 years (am I right here) and justice hasn't been served!
The fact still remains is that the man has a problem with authority, be it the black buck incident or any other.
Now, doing charity is a good thing. But it shouldn't be used as a reason to get a reduced sentence. In Sanjay Dutt's case, his charitable side (especially the one where his is the president of the NGO that helps the blast victims) is being highlighted and used to get a reduced sentence.
Being charitable in no way should be used as a free ride to justice. You break the law and you are convicted, you serve your sentence. You have to pay your dues to the society & the victim's family.
555