Originally posted by: sashashyam
I do not think there will be any Justin, who is a fictional character in CAS. Unless of course the CVs want a motive for turning Helena bitter, ie that her son should be denied the throne.
But there is a catch there too. In CAS, Justin was the elder of the two sons. Still, Bindusara was made the heir apparent using the same argument that Chanakya uses here. But here, Durdhara's son, Bindusara, will clearly be the first born, so even if Helena has a son later, which I doubt, he would only be second in line, and she cannot complain that he was not made the heir apparent.
And I am disappointed to see you trotting along with the herd here, young Khushi, parroting the Nandini as the main cause line.
As I wrote to Saraswathi Akka, the whole scenario is not as unidimensional as the folk here make out. Durdhara loves Chandra, though she does not show it. And as for him, I think he himself does not understand what it is that he feels for her. It is surely not only the anger triggered by Nandini's crude outburst. But there is a deep seated aversion in him towards any act of physical intimacy with a woman, which has to do with his bal brahmachari bent of mind, which is still deeply ingrained in him.
This apart, for me, the only important thing was that Rajat's performance during the whole sequence, from the time he approaches Durdhara to the morning after, was quite simply outstanding. It was a very difficult set of scenes to tackle: the awkwardness, the reluctance amounting to distaste for having any such intimacy with his best friend - whether he is right or wrong here is not the point, the point is that he does so feel - the thinking back to Nandini's mad, hateful tirade, the shamefaced reaction the next morning.
Every single bit of it was near perfect. I cannot think of many actors, even those in films,who could have pulled that off.
Shyamala Aunty