Chandra Nandini 9: A Houdini act

sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#1

Folks,

I must confess straightaway that I am, after more than 14 hours, still in a bad mood. This is because I was forced by the CVs to fall back on my far inferior Option B (see my last thread) - of Chandragupta being arrested and meeting his mother in jail, and then escaping from the prison - instead of the far more impressive one of his outwitting both Padmanand and his darling daughter thru some Chanakyan stratagem that I had hoped that he would have up his sleeve (or on his choga, seeing that he has no sleeves!😉).

Well, he had nothing up his choga, as we all saw, and he was not even able to guess that the daasi who could fight so well might, just might not be what she said she was.

Irresponsible folly: This irritation is not just because the second option is melodramatic and hardly cerebral. It was, and is also because it showed the apple of Chanakya's eye in a distinctly poor light.

Here is a young man sent by his mentor with a vital mandate: to absorb as much of the security and other secrets of the Magadha regime and of their capital as he possibly could. Besides, this young man is generally as tightlipped as could be; he hardly speaks unless absolutely necessary. But what does he do once he gets to Pataliputra?

He does stick to his task in the beginning, but at a crucial moment, he stumbles badly. Like an irresponsible and foolish novice at the spy trade, he reveals his core objective to some random daasi in Maha Padmanand's palace. And for what? No reason of any kind that one can make out. It is not that he has been smitten by her looks and is boasting to impress her. It is plain and simple folly of the kind that one does not expect from him. How does he assume that the daasi will not at once report what he says about his wanting to seize Magadha to her mistress?

What kind of spy is this? Le Carre would have disowned him in an instant. It is, to put it bluntly, unbelievable that Chanakya's prize pupil would commit such a monumental blunder. 😲

Magnificent redemption: However, I must also concede that very soon thereafter, our boy wonder redeemed himself magnificently. Given that I already love him dearly, this was a major relief!

He was, in the whole of that heart-stopping sequence in the throne room for the swayamwar, splendid beyond the power of any words that I could summon up to describe him. But let me try, and do bear with me if I fall short of your expectations!

As he watches Padmanand stride into the room, Chandragupta's gaze is fixed on him, and it is level, cold, and unforgiving. Apart from his own ugly early memories of Padmanand, his Acharya's words echo through his mind, and they are unequivocal.

Tum manushya nahin, yantra ho, Chandra, jiska niyantran mere haath mein hai. Tumhare jeene ka ekmatra uddeshya hai Magadh ke raja Nand ka vinash. Nand hi tumhare jeevan ka ekmatra lakshya hai..

When he sees Nandini and realises the trick that has been played on him - and she is staring at him in patent triumph - he must have felt an inner shock, but there is not even a flicker of any emotion in his face and his eyes. Such is his self control. He looks across at her, his face still and his eyes narrowed, but no more than usual.


When Padmanand invites him to be the first in the competition, Chandragupta smiles slowly, very slightly, like a polite guest looking forward to a feast, but taking care not to look too greedy. 😉


A warrior sans pareil: That is to say, without an equal.

When Padmanand mentions his taking his father's blessings, what must have been crushing blow falls on Chandragupta. Does he show the kind of reaction 999 out of a 1000 would have showed? No. His chin comes up, and his gaze is even more level than usual. There is no other reaction. No shock, no alarm, nothing. He is able to absorb this development, which pulls the rug out from under his feet, demolishing his whole plan of action and exposing him to immediate and deadly danger, as if nothing had happened.

This is the ultimate in detachment, of the kind of nirmohi yogi of a warrior that Lord Krishna speaks of in the Gita, one who knows neither fear nor joy, neither pleasure nor pain, but only his lakshya.

Chandragupta is like lambent fire sheathed in ice. His inner core is always still, and underneath this stillness - which shields his intellect from paralyzing panic - his mind is ceaselessly assessing the situation, testing possible openings, weighing their possibilities.

When Parvatak asserts that this is not his son, there is a very faint smile on Chandragupta's face. When Padmanand baits him about this, this broadens into a wide smile of pure amusement, as he exclaims: Nissandeh!


Thus would Abhimanyu, even when encircled by his Kaurava enemies, have looked: unafraid, unfazed, and almost casual in the face of death.

Liquid lightning: The sword fight between Chandragupta and Dhananand that follows is all swift cut and thrust and parry, and for an aficionada of the noble art, it is over all too soon. Chandragupta fights like liquid lightning, now here, now there, whirling and bending and kneeling and rising faster than the human eye can follow.

I loved watching the changing expressions on the faces of the Nand parivaar, especially Dhananand's almost vocal cheerleader Nandini. She looks more like a member of the crowds at a Roman gladiatorial contest than a princess born, who would have maintained a dignified stillness. Only Avantika is queenly, unmoving and remote, while, in a very odd aside, one of the Nand brothers is actually chortling😉 when Dhananand is slashed again and then again by Chandragupta. Nandini's giggles have by then given place to frozen shock.

The end comes suddenly, with a backwards kick that sends Dhananand reeling. I wish it could have been a fencing trick instead: a feint, then a gliding thrust that gets under the opponent's defence and goes straight for his heart. The coup de mort , the thrust of death.

But the CVs like VFX jumps, so Chandragupta, both swords in his grasp, jumps high into the air and almost spears Dhananand with them. Almost, not quite. How I wish he had killed him then, as he is going to do later in any case!

Ultimate insult: Then, even before the assemblage has recovered from the shock, comes the coup de grace, the master stroke, from the winner. He declares, looking across at Padmanand with a smile that is part amused, part anticipatory, that according to the rules of the swayamvar, the winner in this duel had the right to marry the princess.


But, and here his eyes shift and he looks at Nandini with barely veiled contempt, he adds Main yahan vivaah ke uddeshya se nahin aaya hoon. And then, as Padmanand's fist curls in involuntary fury, comes the ultimate insult: Mujhe yeh sambandh sweekar nahin hai!

Nandini's mouth twists in anger as she is led off by her mother, and no wonder. She has not only seen her supposedly invincible brother defeated roundly in fair combat by an impostor, but her hand has been unceremoniously rejected by the same bahuroopiya. It is not to be borne!😉

Indomitable resilience: What follows is more mundane and entirely predictable: Chandragupta being thrashed with a whip by Padmanand, (who presumably carries a whip around his waist all the time for any eventuality!). What elevates this scene above the pedestrian is the indomitable resilience and raw courage shown by Chandragupta as he takes the blows without once crying out in pain.

The flashbacks to the young Chandragupta counting the slaps inflicted on him by his foster father highlight a point that I have not written about so far. This is rarely the case when child artists are cast for a role, but the young Chandragupta has the kind of face that could easily have grown into the older one. The resemblance is striking, undoubtedly more a piece of serendipity than of informed choice!😉

The more Padmanand whips him, desperately seeking a reaction, the greater is his frustrated rage at his unmoved victim.

Aapne kisi ko itni peedha nahin di hogi jitni maine sahi hai.. Peedha se bahut purana sambandh hai mera!..

As Padmanand thrashes about in impotent fury, Chandragupta, physically on his knees, nonetheless towers over him in the spirit. In a sudden switch to the demeaning tu form of address, he threatens him: Maine kabhi kisi ka rin apne sar nahin liya..tera bhi chukaoonga.. Tu bas ginti smaran rakhna..

He is smiling slightly even as he is being dragged away by the soldiers. What I could not understand was this: why does Chandragupta not retain, if not both, at least one of the two swords he had in his grasp as the end of the duel? Then he would have has some minimal means of self defence.

The Houdini act: OK, you folks who have been wondering about the title, here we are! Harry Houdini was one of the greatest magicians of all time, and his favourite trick was getting out of a locked box into which he had been dumped, arms and legs tied. Our hero is not stuffed into a locked box, but he is dumped in the open prison, his hands firmly tied behind him. So the parallel is close enough to justify the title.

This was the part in the episode that pleased me the most, for it showed how Chandragupta has become an extension of the mind of his mentor, adding to that his own acute intelligence, his unquenchable courage and his never say die spirit.

The manner in which he not only gets his hands free, thanks to his incredible resourcefulness in pinching that soldier's kataar even while being dragged off in such a battered state, using a sudden fake stumble against the man, shows how, no matter how dire the circumstances, his mind is always at the top of the game.

Then comes the Kautilyan deviousness that he has imbibed from his guru: the samadhi vidya that can help him hold his breath deergha samay tak, and then the other maxim, to adopt the look of the enemy in order to escape from the enemy.

He implements both very successfully, but what one cannot understand is this: where did the beard and sideburns come from? Unless he carried a set of facial hard inside his choga for all eventualities, like Padmanand with that whip!😆

The seeds of hatred: Anyhow, let us pass over this blooper, for our boy is free at last. And ready to take his benefactress with him to freedom. If she had agreed, they would have both sneaked out quietly, the soldiers on the outer perimeter would, in the time honoured manner of all night watchmen, been fast asleep at that hour of the night.

But she does not, and I would not blame her for that. She has been so ill-treated and abused for so long, that the only belief that keeps her sane is that her son will come one day to rescue her, and take her away with honour. From this it follows that she has to be there when he arrives, so it stands to reason that she cannot run away before that happens. It is now a monomania, and there is no arguing with that.

Nor did I expect Mura to recognize Chandragupta as her son at this stage. It is far too soon; that will probably happen only around Episode 100!😉

So Chandragupta he changes tack, and decides to do something far more daring, and arrogant in its sheer unexpectedness. He doubles back into the palace, and ends up in the anthahpuram, the quarters of the royal ladies.

Now, as he stares across the room at Nandini, there is a cold anger in his eyes that was not there before. The seeds of the hatred he will come to feel for her in the years ahead, as he learns about his parentage and all that goes with it, have been well and truly sown.

By the precap, he has taken her hostage, and is threatening the apoplectic Padmanand with seeing her arthi if he did not step back. Get set for a Three Musketeers style escape tonight , folks!

Nandini: Ankita has been gently reprimanding me, on my last thread, for being too harsh on Nandini. This was because I had expressed the fond hope that Chandragupta takes her along a hostage part of the way, slung across his saddle like a sack of potatoes, and once he is far enough away to feel safe, dumps her unceremoniously by the roadside, preferably in a nice puddle of mud. A free mudpack, in fact!😆

She had then proceeded to mount an eloquent defence of the bachchi, saying Bachchi hai to bachpna to rahega na!

Now I am not fixated on any hostility per se to this Nandini, nor do I lose sight of the fact that she is daddy's girl, and so oblivious to all his faults (though I really do not see how she has heard nothing about his cruelties towards his subjects in all these years. She must be like Gandhiji's Three Monkeys all rolled into one!😉😉) . But I feel what I feel on perfectly valid grounds, which are independent of the kind of deliberate blindness that produces Nandini's resistance to what her mother wants to tell her.

I have so little patience with her because she is a silly girl, like one of the inane heroines of the old Hindi films who used to behave exactly as she does now. She is not childlike; she is childish, and the two are quite different.

This Nandini has nothing remotely princess like about her. Look at her giggling when the other princes voice their dismay at what they see as an unfair and impossible condition for the swayamwar. There is no dignified reserve about her. Princesses do not laugh at their invited guests. That is it.

Nor does a princess behave like a cheerleader in public, in the presence of so many high ranking guests. She does not bob her head up and down and smirk openly as she waits to see a man slaughtered in front of her eyes. A princess does not behave like a member of the crowd at a Roman gladiatorial contest, which would be most unseemly in someone of her rank and upbringing. Look at her mother, for a contrast. She betrays no emotion almost till the end.

One more point. Chandragupta is not caught because of Nandini's cleverness, and I hope she is not, like her father, patting herself on the back for that. He is caught because that Raja Parvatak turns up at precisely the wrong moment. If this had not happened, Chandragupta would have brazened his way thru the interrogation by Padmanand, and won the competition without being exposed, and then refused the sambandh.

Nor is there any wonderful about Nandini not running away when the escaped bahuroopiya suddenly appears before her. A princess is expected have the pride of her birth, if nothing else (for all that she is only a murderous barber's daughter. Wonder if she knows that. I expect not!). She is not a daasi to run away in fright at the sight of a strange man. This said, Nandini does not look coolly defiant. She looks terrified.

All this is not to say that this Nandini cannot improve, and let Shweta live up to her reputation as an actress of note. But for that to happen, she will first have to get out of this dream world in which she has cocooned herself, not just ignorant about the real world outside but, it would seem, deliberately shutting her eyes to it.

OK, folks, this is it for now. I am sorry to be so late with this, but I was not free at all today till 1 pm. Unfortunately, the real world does not let me forget it!

See you again soon. For now, please do not forget to hit the Like button if you think that is warranted.

Shyamala/Aunty/Akka/Di

PS: All the photos have been kindly shared by Manasi (cute.manasi)

Edited by sashashyam - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

75

Views

9.1k

Users

31

Likes

285

Frequent Posters

Therealbiggboss thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
Very nice and detailed analysis aunty
Agree with each point
As I had said I have some points which can be considered as blooper
So here they are
1- When Chandra was coming along with other Rajkumars then Dhananand's wife called her that"rajkumar malayketu aa game" and then in swayambar scene she was asking "who is rajkumar malayketu, tell me dassi?" but we can leave this point as she is a dumb lady LOL
2- Why they prisoned Chandra in that open place with his hand tied only. And what was need of Chandra to cut his ropes by knife as the hands of Mura were open?and she can have easily opened that
Also that was not a way to imprison a man who is considered to be spy and enemy of the state
3- there was a lot time for Chandra to inspect the palace in the look of soldier and run away easily from the palace instead he went to anatarpura and ended with Nandini
This was just to show heroics of the lead as I must say this is not like Chanakya way

Also why as you had said I also felt that the best student of Chanakya how can did such a blunder of telling his intentions to a dassi as spy didn't tell a word to anyone until they are his freinds

Thank you for PM
varala thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
Fantastic and detailed
Continue
Thanks for pm 😊

sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#4
Thank you, my dear Ankit, and a very nice set of comments too!

I had completely missed the first blooper. You are clever to have spotted it. Tun Tun might be dumb in general, but women do not forget a handsome young man! 😉So that is really a mistake,

As for the second, I had thought of it, but I forgot about it when I was typing out the post. That too is a bloomer.

Well, as of the manner of imprisonment, it is par for the course. The place indicated by Padmanand was the prison for the old prisoners - those who had been there for long - and probably they did not bother too much about security there. But why does Mura not rush to cut his bonds with that knife?

And where has he kept that knife, as he is able to reach it even with his hands tied behind his back?

He goes back to the anthahpura by mistake. He is looking around the palace for the last time when the other guard challenges him. He runs away and ends up in the ladies apartments, which is really a stroke of luck for him, as he finds his exit pass there- Nandini!

Shyamala Aunty

PS: Where is your Like?

Originally posted by: ankit-pandey24

Very nice and detailed analysis aunty
Agree with each point
As I had said I have some points which can be considered as blooper
So here they are
1- When Chandra was coming along with other Rajkumars then Dhananand's wife called her that"rajkumar malayketu aa game" and then in swayambar scene she was asking "who is rajkumar malayketu, tell me dassi?" but we can leave this point as she is a dumb lady LOL
2- Why they prisoned Chandra in that open place with his hand tied only. And what was need of Chandra to cut his ropes by knife as the hands of Mura were open?and she can have easily opened that
Also that was not a way to imprison a man who is considered to be spy and enemy of the state
3- there was a lot time for Chandra to inspect the palace in the look of soldier and run away easily from the palace instead he went to anatarpura and ended with Nandini
This was just to show heroics of the lead as I must say this is not like Chanakya way

Also why as you had said I also felt that the best student of Chanakya how can did such a blunder of telling his intentions to a dassi as spy didn't tell a word to anyone until they are his freinds

Thank you for PM

karkuzhali thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#5
My dear Shyamala,
I am able to see the episodes daily from the "Kasam Theri Pyar ki.com" web site.
I saw the latest today before I read your analysis.
Shyamala, I somehow get a feeling that your write up today bears resemblance to your reviews in JA threads, especially those of the re run episodes, which I had a chance to enjoy.
I have given my comments in red.

Yours
Saraswathi akka.

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Folks,

I must confess straightaway that I am, after more than 14 hours, still in a bad mood. This is because I was forced by the CVs to fall back on my far inferior Option B (see my last thread) - of Chandragupta being arrested and meeting his mother in jail, and then escaping from the prison - instead of the far more impressive one of his outwitting both Padmanand and his darling daughter thru some Chanakyan stratagem that I had hoped that he would have up his sleeve (or on his choga, seeing that he has no sleeves!😉).


I also felt like that but I was not in a bad mood for that long a time.😉

Well, he had nothing up his choga, as we all saw, and he was not even able to guess that the daasi who could fight so well might, just might not be what she said she was.

Irresponsible folly: This irritation is not just because the second option is melodramatic and hardly cerebral. It was, and is also because it showed the apple of Chanakya's eye in a distinctly poor light.

Here is a young man sent by his mentor with a vital mandate: to absorb as much of the security and other secrets of the Magadha regime and of their capital as he possibly could. Besides, this young man is generally as tightlipped as could be; he hardly speaks unless absolutely necessary. But what does he do once he gets to Pataliputra?

He does stick to his task in the beginning, but at a crucial moment, he stumbles badly. Like an irresponsible and foolish novice at the spy trade, he reveals his core objective to some random daasi in Maha Padmanand's palace. And for what? No reason of any kind that one can make out. It is not that he has been smitten by her looks and is boasting to impress her. It is plain and simple folly of the kind that one does not expect from him. How does he assume that the daasi will not at once report what he says about his wanting to seize Magadha to her mistress?

Exactly!

What kind of spy is this? Le Carre would have disowned him in an instant. It is, to put it bluntly, unbelievable that Chanakya's prize pupil would commit such a monumental blunder. 😲

Magnificent redemption: However, I must also concede that very soon thereafter, our boy wonder redeemed himself magnificently. Given that I already love him dearly, this was a major relief!

He was, in the whole of that heart-stopping sequence in the throne room for the swayamwar, splendid beyond the power of any words that I could summon up to describe him. But let me try, and do bear with me if I fall short of your expectations!

As he watches Padmanand stride into the room, Chandragupta's gaze is fixed on him, and it is level, cold, and unforgiving. Apart from his own ugly early memories of Padmanand, his Acharya's words echo through his mind, and they are unequivocal.

Tum manushya nahin, yantra ho, Chandra, jiska niyantran mere haath mein hai. Tumhare jeene ka ekmatra uddeshya hai Magadh ke raja Nand ka vinash. Nand hi tumhare jeevan ka ekmatra lakshya hai..

When he sees Nandini and realises the trick that has been played on him - and she is staring at him in patent triumph - he must have felt an inner shock, but there is not even a flicker of any emotion in his face and his eyes. Such is his self control. He looks across at her, his face still and his eyes narrowed, but no more than usual.

When Padmanand invites him to be the first in the competition, Chandragupta smiles slowly, very slightly, like a polite guest looking forward to a feast, but taking care not to look too greedy. 😉

A warrior sans pareil: That is to say, without an equal.

When Padmanand mentions his taking his father's blessings, what must have been crushing blow falls on Chandragupta. Does he show the kind of reaction 999 out of a 1000 would have showed? No. His chin comes up, and his gaze is even more level than usual. There is no other reaction. No shock, no alarm, nothing. He is able to absorb this development, which pulls the rug out from under his feet, demolishing his whole plan of action and exposing him to immediate and deadly danger, as if nothing had happened.

This is the ultimate in detachment, of the kind of nirmohi yogi of a warrior that Lord Krishna speaks of in the Gita, one who knows neither fear nor joy, neither pleasure nor pain, but only his lakshya.

Chandragupta is like lambent fire sheathed in ice. His inner core is always still, and underneath this stillness - which shields his intellect from paralyzing panic - his mind is ceaselessly assessing the situation, testing possible openings, weighing their possibilities.

When Parvatak asserts that this is not his son, there is a very faint smile on Chandragupta's face. When Padmanand baits him about this, this broadens into a wide smile of pure amusement, as he exclaims: Nissandeh!

Did Parvatak come there without invitation, just to apologise for his sons absence in the Swayamvaram?

Thus would Abhimanyu, even when encircled by his Kaurava enemies, have looked: unafraid, unfazed, and almost casual in the face of death.

Liquid lightning: The sword fight between Chandragupta and Dhananand that follows is all swift cut and thrust and parry, and for an aficionada of the noble art, it is over all too soon. Chandragupta fights like liquid lightning, now here, now there, whirling and bending and kneeling and rising faster than the human eye can follow.

I enjoyed the sword fight..

I loved watching the changing expressions on the faces of the Nand parivaar, especially Dhananand's almost vocal cheerleader Nandini. She looks more like a member of the crowds at a Roman gladiatorial contest than a princess born, who would have maintained a dignified stillness. Only Avantika is queenly, unmoving and remote, while, in a very odd aside, one of the Nand brothers is actually chortling😉 when Dhananand is slashed again and then again by Chandragupta. Nandini's giggles have by then given place to frozen shock.

The end comes suddenly, with a backwards kick that sends Dhananand reeling. I wish it could have been a fencing trick instead: a feint, then a gliding thrust that gets under the opponent's defence and goes straight for his heart. The coup de mort , the thrust of death.

But the CVs like VFX jumps, so Chandragupta, both swords in his grasp, jumps high into the air and almost spears Dhananand with them. Almost, not quite. How I wish he had killed him then, as he is going to do later in any case!

Ultimate insult: Then, even before the assemblage has recovered from the shock, comes the coup de grace, the master stroke, from the winner. He declares, looking across at Padmanand with a smile that is part amused, part anticipatory, that according to the rules of the swayamvar, the winner in this duel had the right to marry the princess.

But, and here his eyes shift and he looks at Nandini with barely veiled contempt, he adds Main yahan vivaah ke uddeshya se nahin aaya hoon. And then, as Padmanand's fist curls in involuntary fury, comes the ultimate insult: Mujhe yeh sambandh sweekar nahin hai!

Nandini's mouth twists in anger as she is led off by her mother, and no wonder. She has not only seen her supposedly invincible brother defeated roundly in fair combat by an impostor, but her hand has been unceremoniously rejected by the same bahuroopiya. It is not to be borne!😉

Indomitable resilience: What follows is more mundane and entirely predictable: Chandragupta being thrashed with a whip by Padmanand, (who presumably carries a whip around his waist all the time for any eventuality!). What elevates this scene above the pedestrian is the indomitable resilience and raw courage shown by Chandragupta as he takes the blows without once crying out in pain.

The flashbacks to the young Chandragupta counting the slaps inflicted on him by his foster father highlight a point that I have not written about so far. This is rarely the case when child artists are cast for a role, but the young Chandragupta has the kind of face that could easily have grown into the older one. The resemblance is striking, undoubtedly more a piece of serendipity than of informed choice!😉

The more Padmanand whips him, desperately seeking a reaction, the greater is his frustrated rage at his unmoved victim.

Aapne kisi ko itni peedha nahin di hogi jitni maine sahi hai.. Peedha se bahut purana sambandh hai mera!..

As Padmanand thrashes about in impotent fury, Chandragupta, physically on his knees, nonetheless towers over him in the spirit. In a sudden switch to the demeaning tu form of address, he threatens him: Maine kabhi kisi ka rin apne sar nahin liya..tera bhi chukaoonga.. Tu bas ginti smaran rakhna..

He is smiling slightly even as he is being dragged away by the soldiers. What I could not understand was this: why does Chandragupta not retain, if not both, at least one of the two swords he had in his grasp as the end of the duel? Then he would have has some minimal means of self defence.

If he had retained the sword, Padmanad's end would have come then itself!

The Houdini act: OK, you folks who have been wondering about the title, here we are! Harry Houdini was one of the greatest magicians of all time, and his favourite trick was getting out of a locked box into which he had been dumped, arms and legs tied. Our hero is not stuffed into a locked box, but he is dumped in the open prison, his hands firmly tied behind him. So the parallel is close enough to justify the title.

This was the part in the episode that pleased me the most, for it showed how Chandragupta has become an extension of the mind of his mentor, adding to that his own acute intelligence, his unquenchable courage and his never say die spirit.

The manner in which he not only gets his hands free, thanks to his incredible resourcefulness in pinching that soldier's kataar even while being dragged off in such a battered state, using a sudden fake stumble against the man, shows how, no matter how dire the circumstances, his mind is always at the top of the game.

Then comes the Kautilyan deviousness that he has imbibed from his guru: the samadhi vidya that can help him hold his breath deergha samay tak, and then the other maxim, to adopt the look of the enemy in order to escape from the enemy.

He implements both very successfully, but what one cannot understand is this: where did the beard and sideburns come from? Unless he carried a set of facial hard inside his choga for all eventualities, like Padmanand with that whip!😆

Remember, he took off Nandini's false beard when he was having the fight with her..All these fake beards have gum solution in them, and it will be very easy to fix them on the face! Really!

The seeds of hatred: Anyhow, let us pass over this blooper, for our boy is free at last. And ready to take his benefactress with him to freedom. If she had agreed, they would have both sneaked out quietly, the soldiers on the outer perimeter would, in the time honoured manner of all night watchmen, been fast asleep at that hour of the night.

But she does not, and I would not blame her for that. She has been so ill-treated and abused for so long, that the only belief that keeps her sane is that her son will come one day to rescue her, and take her away with honour. From this it follows that she has to be there when he arrives, so it stands to reason that she cannot run away before that happens. It is now a monomania, and there is no arguing with that.

Nor did I expect Mura to recognize Chandragupta as her son at this stage. It is far too soon; that will probably happen only around Episode 100!😉

Didn't she see the tattoo on his arm?

So Chandragupta he changes tack, and decides to do something far more daring, and arrogant in its sheer unexpectedness. He doubles back into the palace, and ends up in the anthahpuram, the quarters of the royal ladies.

Now, as he stares across the room at Nandini, there is a cold anger in his eyes that was not there before. The seeds of the hatred he will come to feel for her in the years ahead, as he learns about his parentage and all that goes with it, have been well and truly sown.

By the precap, he has taken her hostage, and is threatening the apoplectic Padmanand with seeing her arthi if he did not step back. Get set for a Three Musketeers style escape tonight , folks!

Nandini: Ankita has been gently reprimanding me, on my last thread, for being too harsh on Nandini. This was because I had expressed the fond hope that Chandragupta takes her along a hostage part of the way, slung across his saddle like a sack of potatoes, and once he is far enough away to feel safe, dumps her unceremoniously by the roadside, preferably in a nice puddle of mud. A free mudpack, in fact!😆

She had then proceeded to mount an eloquent defence of the bachchi, saying Bachchi hai to bachpna to rahega na!

Now I am not fixated on any hostility per se to this Nandini, nor do I lose sight of the fact that she is daddy's girl, and so oblivious to all his faults (though I really do not see how she has heard nothing about his cruelties towards his subjects in all these years. She must be like Gandhiji's Three Monkeys all rolled into one!😉😉) . But I feel what I feel on perfectly valid grounds, which are independent of the kind of deliberate blindness that produces Nandini's resistance to what her mother wants to tell her.

I have so little patience with her because she is a silly girl, like one of the inane heroines of the old Hindi films who used to behave exactly as she does now. She is not childlike; she is childish, and the two are quite different.

This Nandini has nothing remotely princess like about her. Look at her giggling when the other princes voice their dismay at what they see as an unfair and impossible condition for the swayamwar. There is no dignified reserve about her. Princesses do not laugh at their invited guests. That is it.

Nor does a princess behave like a cheerleader in public, in the presence of so many high ranking guests. She does not bob her head up and down and smirk openly as she waits to see a man slaughtered in front of her eyes. As princess does not behave like a member of the crowd at a Roman gladiatorial contest, which would be most unseemly in someone of her rank and upbringing. Look at her mother, for a contrast. She betrays no emotion almost till the end.

One more point. Chandragupta is not caught because of Nandini's cleverness, and I hope she is not, like her father, patting herself on the back for that. He is caught because that Raja Parvatak turns up at precisely the wrong moment. If this had not happened, Chandragupta would have brazened his way thru the interrogation by Padmanand, and won the competition without being exposed, and then refused the sambandh.

This looks drama-like( not dramatic)

Nor is there any wonderful about Nandini not running away when the escaped bahuroopiya suddenly appears before her. A princess is expected have the pride of her birth, if nothing else (for all that she is only a murderous barber's daughter. Wonder if she knows that. I expect not!). She is not a daasi to run away in fright at the sight of a strange man. This said, Nandini does not look coolly defiant. She looks terrified.

All this is not to say that this Nandini cannot improve, and let Shweta live up to her reputation as an actress of note. But for that to happen, she will first have to get out of this dream world in which she has cocooned herself, not just ignorant about the real world outside but, it would seem, deliberately shutting her eyes to it.

OK, folks, this is it for now. I am sorry to be so late with this, but I was not free at all today till 1 pm. Unfortunately, the real world does not let me forget it!

See you again soon. For now, please do not forget to hit the Like button if you think that is warranted.

Shyamala/Aunty/Akka/Di

Edited by karkuzhali - 8 years ago
Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
Wonderful analysis Aunty!
I agree with u that it was really strange to see Chandra telling his plans to a 'daasi'.May be he thought even of the 'daasi' tells the truth to the king,he may not believe her by thinking that she is a 'tucch daasi' or even if he believes her and calls for Chandra, he can lie and save himself. I think if Malayketu's father wouldn't have turned up all of a sudden, he probably could have used another Chanakya Neeti and save himself.

There can be another reason why they showed this.As it's a love story, they are trying to show that Chandra can express everything only to Nandini. She's the only one jiske aage he feels free to express all his feelings and everything. I am sure they are going to show this in the future. After all,in the first episode itself,the voiceover said that CGM became powerful ruler only because of Nandini so this is the starting point of that relationship. Even if he shouldn't have said that but he still said because the person who he was talking to was his Jeevan sangini.😆

Like Ankit,even I also noticed all those bloopers about Nandini's bhabhi asking who is Malayketu even after seeing him while he was entering the palace and the soldiers throwing him in front of Moora install of a closed room,etc.I felt it was too early for Moora and CGM to meet and I am sure they are going to meet like this again with both feeling a strange connection and apnapan before finally getting to know the real relationship which will happen in a few months.

I am just bored of Nandini's bhabhi's marriage talks but I guess,in those days women were conditioned to only think about marriage and their duties towards their family and nothing else.But it's strange that she still expects Nandini to marry the spy because he is brave and smart.

As I already said it yesterday, Nandini doesn't have that charm and that grace of a princess. She only looks like a princess because of her clothes but her personality is not that of a princess. Swetha should work on that.

Thanks once again for the analysis.
Kavya_P thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Kavya_P

thanks for analysis aunty


thanks for pm aunty
Kavya_P thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 8 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Kavya_P


thanks for pm aunty


sorry for the late reply aunty
Priyaadarshini thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#9
Aunty,
Awesome analysis!!! Yeah... I agree that your option A was better. I would like to think that Chandra wants to know about the' karagrih'. And so he purposely tells the dasi about his motive. And second option would be, he did not care about getting caught as he is fearless and anyhow don't want to get married. (Which is quite stupid for other wise sensible behavior).

Nand's son that you are talking about is mentally disable, I guess. He was earlier in the frame too.
Rajat was fabulous in the court scene. And the cherry on the cake is his rejecting nandini. Once he had rejected his money and now he rejected his darling daughter. He has wounded ego of father- daughter duo .

And nandini not being graceful enough, you answered this question already. Her mother is born royal, whereas nandini is barber's daughter.
Btw, you have nothing to say about moora- Chandra scene. ? I liked rajat in that scene.
P.S. I would love to hear what you have to say about "bajirav- mastaani". Seeing that you are such an excellent observer. Ofcource, as and when time and health permits.
Take care. Akanksha.
Shinning_Stuti thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#10
I knew that Chandra can have no plan behind revealing his purpose of getting into Magadh to Nandini other than showing off his hunar of dialogues to audiences,😆😉 but never expected he will be caught so stupidly😡... How did Chanakya and Chandra had no backup plan in case real Malayketu's identity gets reveal anyway?😕 they must have stepped forward before confirming that Malayketu's father won't come between anyway?
More on later, but I have 2 questions:

1. Where did the other friends of Chandra go when Chandra was caught?😕
2. Chandra had cut the hairs and beard of the dead soldier for taking disguise; but from where did he get the gum to fix that properly? 😆 was he carrying that or Moora had a stock of gum? (Chandra reminded me Jalal after taking disguise🤣)

Overall I enjoyed the episode... Quite a happening one. 😉. These bloopers will go on Aunty, don't be sad with these.😆 Thank you for the awesome post Aunty.😳

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".