Why are Ahankara and Devi loved but not KWK ? - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

50

Views

11.3k

Users

16

Likes

202

Frequent Posters

MuguetDScorpion thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: BabyHimavari

for me... Mostly characterization of the character works for me.. \

Have not much to say about Ahankara... I was neither Ashkara or Sushkara fan but I admired ahankara... and her friendship with ashoka was treat to watch.. not their love story but the story of their friendship and the understanding they shared attracted me most...

both ahankara and devi had a certain dignity which KWK character lacks... No one likes mahan heroine.. but we actually search for the character with whom we could connect.. and i actually feel that Ahankara and devi looked to me more realistic with their flaws...

Lastly... Not ahankara, devi or kwk... i am here to see the life of my fav chakravartin ashoka samrat... so pls dvs spare us with some real histiry stuff as the show is on the verge to end,..😆


Actually there was no love story between Ashkara. It was friendship. Only at the end Ahankara confessed her love. That's why it was actually beautiful. They did not need to be lovers to show a beautiful bonding, friendship, understanding, chemistry.

Dignity is actually the word for Ahankara and Devi. 👏

That's exactly what most of us wanted but unfortunately we got something else. 😆
MuguetDScorpion thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 8 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: swathiinduru

Hey even I liked ahankara from the beginning, what I meant s few people didn't like her inw the start they might be ashoka wife's fans maybe they weren't ready to accept fictional character, but I saw the very same people started liking her slowly, that's the power of Gud characterisation and acting on top of that she's really gorgeous.

I liked her from beginning because she was obviously amazing and fiery, I liked that, but I fell in love with ahan after lakhgruh burning incident where she went against her family as she felt it s completely injustice, I liked the way she stood for the right, even I liked her with sumedh ,then she was also amazing with sid also.

Ya about ashwaki it was completely unnecessary to show all that childhood drama, I said so many times cvs r showing anything but ashoka, my neighbor s a historical professor who had done phd very old man, I just told him once to see ashoka , he was petrified😆 seeing ashoka, just one episode he said never to watch this nonsense and it's completely insult to see this ashoka.

Yes historical ashvi story s very important, dnt know how much u know about their story, but yaar u should really read their it's really interesting one , if u want see devi AT ,1 page , I wrote little summary about their story, their story s really interesting, that's y I admire historical ashvi of course no comments about cas characters😆

Lastly interesting topic for weekend⭐️


That's actually the moment when we see that she has a pure heart. She is not evil like her family or does not have sick mentality like Sushim. You just fall in love with her even more.

Even my mom said it's nonsense now. She said it was good before the leap. At least it looked like some historical show though not true all the time but it looked historical. 😆

Yeah I read somewhere about Ashvi story and Devi's personality. It was so interesting. The CVs really missed the opportunities to show both Ashvi and Ashwaki in a correct way. Because the real KVK was also very interesting. They could have made something beautiful instead ruined the show so much that it's ending. 😆

PS: Glad that you all liked the topic. Thanks. 😃
Edited by MuguetDScorpion - 8 years ago
LadyMacbeth thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#33
I think we delude ourselves if we say that an actor or an actress's look does not matter . I would say , it's the thing that matters most , YES , even acting comes later . Specially if that actor or actress is looking for a lead role/playing a lead role . That is how this Entertainment Industry' runs . Everyone first judge a actor or actress on his/her looks , because that's what we get from his/her on the first glimpse...whether she can act or gives completely weird expression and shouts at a shrill ( very unprincess-ly ) voice...comes later . Look is most important - that is why all the actors/actresses groom themselves i.e. they try to look better than they actually look .
Also , it's perfectly okay to judge and comment on an actor's look ( and everyone does regardless the moral policing of a few intellectuals 😆 ) . We don't judge a professional ( for example a Doctor or a pilot or a lawyer ) on his looks , do we ? Even for them looks and grooming matters these days . A handsome or a pretty doctor gets more practice than a simpler looking one with same professional eficiency . That is why grooming is now essential in EVERY field of the world . But in Entertainment industry it is absolutely mandatory . Why ? Because they know ( and they should accept ) that their faces and figures will be judged .
Actually , boys do it much more than girls ( sorry Shyam and BB ) . My classmates think Deepika is far far better than Vidya or Kangana ? When I asked them ( and I did asked them because I think highly of Vidya and Kangs as actresses ) why ? Their answer - Have you seen Deepika or not ? She is 100 times hotter than those two . I have got similar opinions everywhere around me .
Last of all - according to IF code of conduct moral policing is against the rule too . You don't like something you read ? Plain ignore or hit the report button .
Edited by VasusenaRadheya - 8 years ago
Morana thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 8 years ago
#34
I think there's absolutely nothing wrong in judging an actor by their looks. After all they got paid for their looks and acting both. Plus each and every one do it and even justify their choices boldly n honestly based on their looks.
Take example of KRPKAB forum . There the third angle who's a male character played by an established good actor and the character is just flawless yet the entire forum is gaga over the name lead who's extremely flawed and actually a study in taking the concept of flawed character too far but his each and every fault n mistakes are fiercely defended and he's the Apple of the eye for the entire forum because he's quite exquisitely handsome no point denying it.
my point is - looks are EXTREMELY important for television and movies . One who denies it is living in a fools heaven and detached from absolutely accepted social practice that is done by all n sundry.
Or may be moral policing with a holier than thou attitude has its own appeal for some.

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#35
Now this is something that's hugely controversial.
People who say the celebs deserve to be judged for their looks are not wrong and people who say Looks r not always important are also not wrong.

When Aishwarya gained weight after pregnancy, she was mocked and ridiculed a lot.Some said weight gain is a natural thing for every woman.Some said as she is a celeb,she is bound to lose weight and if she doesn't,she deserves to be criticized.

Both were not wrong.

I guess we should stick to the main topic and not divert it anymore.Everyone has their own opinions.
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#36
Nikki, it hardly matters whether the particular term or word-phrasing used by you was derogatory or not. Reem's shoddy acting and her shrill mannerism got trolled all the darn time on here, but that was well-deserved and hence nobody (including myself) had a problem with it. However, fact remains that looks is something nobody can control, much less a minor who's at an age where popular perception would play a huge part in shaping up her self-esteem. Disparaging comments about a teenager's looks online can cause a lot of damage to them, believe me when I say this. I wouldn't have taken such a firm stance even if it was Soumya's looks being dissected.
Just my two bits. Don't mind if I sounded rebuking, because online cyber-bullying of minors is something I'm especially sensitive about.
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#37
There was this forum where the "handsome" male lead was a borderline-rapist and an abusive personality to boot, but that didn't stop some hormonal, starry-eyed teenage girls from rooting from him and unabashedly justifying the character's crimes. Now, if this (letting looks overrule character traits) if an "acceptable" exercise by some (who, not co-incidentally, are huge fan-girls themselves so I guess they cannot help it 😆), then, I rest my case. Yeah, go on, support despicable characters because the actor "looks good". Totally normal, totally acceptable, totally...well.

P.S. Not all actors are paid to "look good" on screen, only those chosen for flowerpot roles are. coming to lead roles on TV, I can rattle off a list of names belonging to successful lead actors on TV who were not "traditionally" handsome/beautiful. Aside from this, one can criticise surgery done by celebs on their bodies since that is their own doing. There's a nuanced difference between these scenarios which is totally lost on some drooling fanbots. (Not talking about you, Subha).
Edited by krystal_watz - 8 years ago
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#38
P.S. Speaking more or less correct English as regards grammar and sentence construction, DOES NOT mean that you're NOT a fanbot. Sorry. Frequent drooling on actors in elaborate fan-fiction-ish language, fighting over 'fandoms', judging characters by how 'hawt' the actor looks, etc. are some of the Fanbotozoa's traits which give them away everywhere, no matter how correct their English is. Fanbots in disguise are still fanbots so sorry folks. I won't change my opinion on fanbot intellect (Oxymoron as the term is), no matter how hard you press me for it. 😆
Subha, Muguet and everybody else: Sorry for getting carried away. Promise to ignore all juvenile provocation from now on.
Edited by krystal_watz - 8 years ago
Niki. thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

Nikki, it hardly matters whether the particular term or word-phrasing used by you was derogatory or not. Reem's shoddy acting and her shrill mannerism got trolled all the darn time on here, but that was well-deserved and hence nobody (including myself) had a problem with it. However, fact remains that looks is something nobody can control, much less a minor who's at an age where popular perception would play a huge part in shaping up her self-esteem. Disparaging comments about a teenager's looks online can cause a lot of damage to them, believe me when I say this. I wouldn't have taken such a firm stance even if it was Soumya's looks being dissected.

Just my two bits. Don't mind if I sounded rebuking, because online cyber-bullying of minors is something I'm especially sensitive about.


Seriously what's you problem?? It seems from your tone that you love her a lot!! So
Protect Reem as she's a kid. " I mean I don't understand from which angle she looks and behaves and acts like a kid ??

So she'll behave like a adult and still hide behind the Kid card whenever criticized ?? 🥱
She has posted one video of hers Grooving to Western song "Let me love you" In that video she grooves vulgarly, Pans the camera at her belly. showing her stomach, And grooves cheaply. Majority Siddharthians bashed her left right center ,obviously Cos of her Adult Sensual behavior. 🥱 So what makes you think she is a kid. lol
And If you see Reem's insta, her status, what does it say".I am to glam to give a Dam"..Doesn't this Signify High attitude . Isn't she a celebrity, then why keep such status. upon that she is not a good actress too. So what will people think ?? Most of siddharthians think she is a bad actress with Attitude. And that's why so much negativity Surrounding her. And stop Moral policing or dragging me into all this. As I don't giv a dam!!.. 😵
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: nikii11


Seriously what's you problem?? It seems from your tone that you love her a lot!! So
Protect Reem as she's a kid. " I mean I don't understand from which angle she looks and behaves and acts like a kid ??

So she'll behave like a adult and still hide behind the Kid card whenever criticized ?? 🥱
She has posted one video of hers Grooving to Western song "Let me love you" In that video she grooves vulgarly, Pans the camera at her belly. showing her stomach, And grooves cheaply. Majority Siddharthians bashed her left right center ,obviously Cos of her Adult Sensual behavior. 🥱 So what makes you think she is a kid. lol
And If you see Reem's insta, her status, what does it say".I am to glam to give a Dam"..Doesn't this Signify High attitude . Isn't she a celebrity, then why keep such status. upon that she is not a good actress too. So what will people think ?? Most of siddharthians think she is a bad actress with Attitude. And that's why so much negativity Surrounding her. And stop Moral policing or dragging me into all this. As I don't giv a dam!!.. 😵


Chill, Nikki. Don't get so riled up since nobody was really attacking you. Like I already said, she was a shitty actress for a long time, so where did you see any "lowwe" for her? Do read my post once more, if you please. You clearly didn't get the point about 'minor and cyber-bullying', so I guess we'll have to stop here. Take care.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".