Should Hrithik have been cast as Lord Ram in Ramayana?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

rebelheart

@iamrebelheart

Sparkler

+ 4

Fantasy Force

Posted: 1 years ago

#21

Sai is getting 6 crores only while RK is getting 75 crores. How unfair is that.

Quote

Clochette

@Clochette

Sparkler

+ 9

Posted: 1 years ago

#22

They indeed could have made it less costly with another actor as Ram, one who has the needed youthfullness and won't need additional CGI costs.

I agree with BI, that Hrithik has features that remind of Western gods (Greek/Roman/German)...and there would be extra-costs, too.

I wonder if the producer(s) even did auditions for another Ram...

Until now - baring the promotional pics - I don't have a good feeling for the project.

Edited by Clochette - 1 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Erika

@roni_berna

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 1 years ago

#23

I like to see Hrithik only in Dhoom kinda characters riding the bike. He looks so hot smiley42 smiley43

Quote

oh nakhrewaali

@oh_nakhrewaali

Viewbie

+ 38

Posted: 1 years ago

#24

No one can beat him in that dept... Meanwhile Ram Charan in his Ram look in RRR: Haan yeh kar lo pehle😮‍💨

Quote

Frost

@Zilan

Navigator

Sci-Fi Squad

Posted: 1 years ago

#25

After the prabas disaster they should have taken the hint and not make this movie at the first place. HR is any day a much better choice than overrated RK

Quote

raina

@Girlabouttown

Rocker

+ 6

Posted: 1 years ago

#26

Yes I agree

Quote

1 2 3

Hrithik Roshan

Should Hrithik have been cast as Lord Ram in Ramayana? - Page 3

Related Topics

Explore Topics