Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan
We all know nepotism exists and have accepted that. Thanks, thats great.
The real problem is, when UNDESERVING nepotistic babies, get unlimited chances to "improve". I will give you an example. The Archies kids SUCK (Khushi-Suhana-Agastly) they are simple TERRIBLE. However, because they are nepo babies, the industry will give them 100 chances to "come back and improve" - the same way duds like Abhishek, Arjun Kapoor, Ananya and Janhvi never seem to run out of opportunities.
THAT is the problem. Why are UNTALENTED nepo kids, forcibly given multiple opportunities? I understand if you are so and so's child and get a movie - fine, I get it. BUT....why is it okay for them to be bad and continue to receive offers? And more importantly - with all the access and resources WHY ARENT THEY GOOD? Some of them cant speak, cant dance, cant do anything.....WHY? Why are they not better prepared? How dare they join the industry and " learn as they go"? Its one thing to GET an opportunity, but another thing to get an opportunity and having done no hardwork to make the most of it.
THAT is the problem. You have people like Tripti Dimri, Rajkumar Rao or Sanya Malhotra - who are great and amazing....ON DAY ONE itself. Why do they have to show up and be amazing on day one? but Ananya and Suhana can bring their wooden faces everywhere and be celebrated?
If you're going to give me a Hrithik or Rani, then I am here for nepotism. But dont give me a Ananya, Khushi or Suhana and expect me to be okay with it.
And also - some people with their "I am fan of their parents so I will automatically root for them" - Seriously? Are you dumb? Whoever thinks like that, you are the problem with the world and a true manifestation of bias.
Main point - if you are nepo and get a movie, I am okay with it. But if you are horrible on screen and haven't' done any prep or hardwork- you need to disappear and spare us all.
18