Originally posted by: ohophelia
I'm sorry but this is crazy to me. There was definitely something happening from BOTH sides even if not a full blown public affair. What person let's their colleague put their pinky in their pocket, if not there's something brewing? Are we really assuming that SRK was defenseless to PC's actions and couldn't tell her off because she was possibly jeopardizing his relationship with his wife and kids? In fact it could really be the other way around. A mighty star grooms a young upcoming actress. There was easily a power differential between them. I'm pretty sure had it been another actor in his place, this would have become the narrative. PC was giddy with love (or so she thought) and wanted to show the world in her own childish way with those statements. While SRK kept it decent, under wraps like affairs with married men are usually are. That is the only difference.
PC is not Kangana. It's actually pretty cruel to label her Kangana 1.0 because you're labelling her a crazy woman who cooked up the affair when that obviously is not the case.
Making a man responsible for the woman's actions is a subtler form of patriarchy than making the *other woman* responsible for the family's breakup. Patriarchy, nevertheless.
SRK is not responsible for Priyanka's actions. Nor is he responsible for telling her to behave herself. Nor is he responsible for her emotions. She was a grown woman when she came to Bollywood. Grown people take responsibility for their own actions.
You could believe SRK groomed her. That is entirely up to you.
What we have as publicly available info is certainly one-sided. From PC's side. And she proceeded to give out hints designed to attack his family. Oh, yeah. She gets that title.
57