SRK-Priyanka Affair - Page 14

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

18 is an adult in most countries. Old enough to vote, fight and die for your country, get married and have children.

Apparently, not old enough to be held responsible for her own actions acc to you.

It's not about being 18 though. It's about the massive age difference. At 18, a person has still not passed their teenage years. A 30 year old lusting or "flirting" with an 18 year old is still gross even if the said 18 year old is legally an adult. I thought that didn't need to be said.

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Watch from around 2:00

Yeah, SRK does that. It's stupid in the public eye. It also crosses the line. Unfortunately for Priyanka and her supporters, it also clearly means nothing coming from SRK. She might have been naive enough to misunderstand, but she was also grown enough to understand her own culpability.

https://youtu.be/9eGPxhxbyJI

Wouldn't the party causing the misunderstanding be culpable equally or are we just meting out selective justice to only one party, who happens to be a woman, to wash our hands off?

Originally posted by: ohophelia

The mental gymnastics are hilarious. On one end, they wanna shame the woman ALONE and call her a floozy who's been around the block and on another hand the same men are allowed to "harmlessly flirt" with a floozy to get their jollies on.

You do understand the difference between flirting and having a dozen relationships to climb the ladder? You are no babe in the woods if you are having multiple affairs with married men. Then spending years and years planting articles, feeding the media, harassing other women, etc. all because you failed in accomplishing your ultimate grift.

Like I said, she and her 8 fans can only keep crying and attention-seeking through a superstar's name but it will still amount to absolutely nothing.

Meanwhile, watch out for Dunki on Christmas - coming to a theater near you.

It was a good day to be blind again because tf am I reading here?

Originally posted by: hotchoco

You do understand the difference between flirting and having a dozen relationships to climb the ladder? You are no babe in the woods if you are having multiple affairs with married men.

Not SRK's text-book mid-life crisis being rebranded as an act of radical feminism

Originally posted by: Maharani69

????? MA'AM as a heterosexual male in power positions with copious privilege you get to fck anything that moves but god forbid it's a woman, oh she's promiscuous and extracting favors. Now your thinking reeks of patriarchy, not that newly introduced definition I read two pages ago.

Nope. I would say the same about men who behave the same way and then play the victim. Everyone knows what they're doing especially when they're 30+ years old. It does not turn any of them into poor baby victims because their delusional dreams came crashing to the ground.

Originally posted by: hotchoco

You do understand the difference between flirting and having a dozen relationships to climb the ladder? You are no babe in the woods if you are having multiple affairs with married men. Then spending years and years planting articles, feeding the media, harassing other women, etc. all because you failed in accomplishing your ultimate grift.

Like I said, she and her 8 fans can only keep crying and attention-seeking through a superstar's name but it will still amount to absolutely nothing.

Meanwhile, watch out for Dunki on Christmas - coming to a theater near you.

Sure, multiple affairs with MARRIED men, who all get off scot free while we witch hunt the woman and call her easy and being passed around the block.

I'm not a fan, neither do I care about them both. Just couldn't stand the hypocrisy and had to say my piece.

Originally posted by: ohophelia

Sure, multiple affairs with MARRIED men, who all get off scot free while we witch hunt the woman and call her easy and being passed around the block.

I'm not a fan, neither do I care about them both. Just couldn't stand the hypocrisy and had to say my piece.

Now why are you making things up? She herself seeks attention and desperately tries to connect her name to his and keeps planting articles in the media and throws tantrums. She wouldn't get any censure at all if she wasn't so keen on getting attention from it and keeping it circulating come hell or high water. She LOVES being talked about for her supposed affairs.

Nor has she been witch-hunted - she gets the same amount of flak as the men do. There are some here trying to paint her as some innocent victim in the same way that it happens for the men.

Originally posted by: hotchoco

Now why are you making things up? She herself seeks attention and desperately tries to connect her name to his and keeps planting articles in the media and throws tantrums. She wouldn't get any censure at all if she wasn't so keen on getting attention from it and keeping it circulating come hell or high water. She LOVES being talked about for her supposed affairs.

Nor has she been witch-hunted - she gets the same amount of flak as the men do. There are some here trying to paint her as some innocent victim in the same way that it happens for the men.

Okay, first decide whether it's "harmless flirting misunderstood as something else by the crazy delusional woman" or an actual affair. Because those two terms are being used interchangeably here and they don't mean the same thing.

The man involved in this affair is not getting the same flak though. He's being shielded and portrayed as a matryr.