Why bollywood movies nowadays don't have repeat value - Page 7

Originally posted by: moonv

You are quite annoyed by the south word. But that will stay as a fact. South movies are commercially more known for mass entertainers than any other genres. Because one person found success in them, BW started producing them than the stories it was known for and what the thread started for. I never favoured BW for it.

That is what infers from my statements that Bollywood has majorly worked towards south style action movies which will always be equivalent to no repeat values like the examples given in the thread start!

You or I as a viewer don't represent the huge public viewings which favoured such genres.

Additionally you have been quite rude in this argument. So just in your own tongue, take rest and calm down again! There is no need to take this argument further because of your volatile mind of hearing the word south and thinking everyone is bashing it.

Even entertaining movies has repeat value.

Bw is lazy , takes from other industries n mix it with punjabi n Urdu n make cheap version with no repeat value .Hindi is missed in Hindi films .

@bold - I agree 😆

Originally posted by: atominis

Hahahahaha! Punjabis made Bollywood WAY BIGGER THAN what your regional cinema is. Raj Kapoor, Dilip Kumar, Rafi, Vinod Khanna, Chopras, Johars, Dharmendra, Deols, Dutts, Kapoors, Anand Bakshi, S Mohinder, Oscar winner Gulzar, Om Puri, Pran, Amrish Puri, Poonam Dhillon, Geeta Bali, Kirron Kher etc are all Punjabis. Amitabh is also half Punjabi.

Most legends of BW who took it global are Punjabi. Deal with it.

That classy talk show host Simi Garewal is also Punjabi.

So much for calling out Punjabi work ethic when there is not many who matched contributions of these legends.

Rather Bollywood remakes Punjabi songs to cash on popularity just as it recently made Laung laachi song because that Punjabi song is first Indian song to cross 1 billion views on YouTube.

Their biggest hits like Gadar, DDLJ, K3G are set in Punjabi characters.

The jealousy and hate shows. Cope.

First produce as many legends as Punjabi artistes did then talk.

Punjabis, Sindhis, Marathis, Bongs made Bollywood for what it was. Deal with it.

Got mad, did ya?

Good.😊

Now you get why I got mad.

Originally posted by: moonv

You are quite annoyed by the south word. But that will stay as a fact. South movies are commercially more known for mass entertainers than any other genres. Because one person found success in them, BW started producing them than the stories it was known for and what the thread started for. I never favoured BW for it.

That is what infers from my statements that Bollywood has majorly worked towards south style action movies which will always be equivalent to no repeat values like the examples given in the thread start!

You or I as a viewer don't represent the huge public viewings which favoured such genres.

Additionally you have been quite rude in this argument. So just in your own tongue, take rest and calm down again! There is no need to take this argument further because of your volatile mind of hearing the word south and thinking everyone is bashing it.

My taking objection to bigotry is rude?

How about not using the word *south* to describe loud and crass?

You're right though. The argument is at an end when you believe what you stated above.

I used the word South remakes for cheap masala films and never used word South Indians blaming them as people.

The difference is clear. The bigotry here is from your side.

Originally posted by: atominis

I have never blamed South at all and I already did say BW lacks talent. Why are you falsely accusing me of blaming South?

u say for brahmastra , beef party n not blaming r mocking anything , ya . Stop this north vs south , every one can see it now .

India gdp is dwindling tats y bw is targeted

Beef party

North vs south .

ya discussing bw lol .

Originally posted by: Medha_Sree

India gdp is dwindling tats y bw is targeted

Please explain this one more throughly. If what your saying is true wouldn’t the 250 crore nett of Brahmastra help ?

Others brought North vs South. IDGAF about this as I hardly watch regional films at all.

I responded to someone else.

Anyway where did beef come here? 🤣

Originally posted by: atominis

I used the word South remakes for cheap masala films and never used word South Indians blaming them as people.

The difference is clear. The bigotry here is from your side.

No, you didn't say cheap masala films. What you said was south films. What Moonv said was south-style films.

There is a difference that and saying cheap, masala films.

What I said was clearly *What if.* Spelled out as *What if.* Not just implied.

Originally posted by: hearmeroar

By that criteria, is it ok for me to say the Punjabi domination of Bollywood is what ruined it with their sheer dumbness and laziness in approaching the art?

Hey, I didn't target ALL Punjabis. I didn't question their taste and their work ethic.

Let's end this argument now. I got your POV anyway. You're going to stick to it. Bollywood is bad because of south films. Not because of their lack of talent, not because they're lazy, not because they steal from the lowest common denominator because that's all the capacity they seem to have to understand. 👍🏼

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

My taking objection to bigotry is rude?

How about not using the word *south* to describe loud and crass?

You're right though. The argument is at an end when you believe what you stated above.

Ya taking objection to certain bigotry is against humanity lol .

describe india , certain section n south with certain labels n objection to them is against humanity n honor with labels n wat not lol .

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Please explain this one more throughly. If what your saying is true wouldn’t the 250 crore nett of Brahmastra help ?

Ask atmonis , tat gem told by her lol .