If Amisha Patel can do Gadar 2, why can’t Aishwarya Rai get movies? - Page 4

But srk did ADHM eventhough it was a guest role.

Originally posted by: atominis

Bleh.

All 90s stars are busy working with much younger girls.

Given the fallout Ash had with Khans I do not think they will ever work again.

I sometimes wonder how Khans are so 'together' despite faking rivalry.

I mean all 3 of them got Ash removed from films in 2000s. SRK got her out of KANK, Chalte chalte, Veer Zaara. Aamir removed her from the Rising, Salman damaged her career like none else.

I am surprised the other Khans removed her from their films just because of her issues with Salman.

Akshay will even work with any new teenage debutante rather than a 90s actress. His heroines keep getting younger and younger.

I bet he did it for sake of Karan Johar.

As a main lead he still does not take Ash. Not even for special appearances the way he took Rani and Kajol for RNBDJ, Kal ho na Ho, OSO.

Have you noticed, how OSO is set in 1970s but does not even obliquely refer to Bachchan who was the biggest superstar of that era?

I sometimes feel he omitted Bachchan reference in OSO and grew a distance from Bachchans also due to cold war with Aishwarya. I was surprised when he took Abhishek for HNY though and forgave his not being invited to Abhi and Ash wedding.

Originally posted by: atominis

I bet he did it for sake of Karan Johar.

As a main lead he still does not take Ash. Not even for special appearances the way he took Rani and Kajol for RNBDJ, Kal ho na Ho, OSO.

Have you noticed, how OSO is set in 1970s but does not even obliquely refer to Bachchan who was the biggest superstar of that era?

I sometimes feel he omitted Bachchan reference in OSO and grew a distance from Bachchans also due to cold war with Aishwarya. I was surprised when he took Abhishek for HNY though and forgave his not being invited to Abhi and Ash wedding.

Aishwarya also rejected the female lead role in HNY, she says it was because she wasn't paired opposite Abishek and instead with SRK...

Its true that srk does guest roles for karan Johar. But he was always cordial with Amitabh n jaya even after the wedding.so letting abhishek do his movie didnt become a news.These people do not do open war with big stars even though they feel insulted by them.but its been heard that a few years back he apologized to Ash.maybe bcz of that he acted with abhi n ash.

[ QUOTE=atominis]

I bet he did it for sake of Karan Johar.

As a main lead he still does not take Ash. Not even for special appearances the way he took Rani and Kajol for RNBDJ, Kal ho na Ho, OSO.

Have you noticed, how OSO is set in 1970s but does not even obliquely refer to Bachchan who was the biggest superstar of that era?

I sometimes feel he omitted Bachchan reference in OSO and grew a distance from Bachchans also due to cold war with Aishwarya. I was surprised when he took Abhishek for HNY though and forgave his not being invited to Abhi and Ash wedding.

Was she indeed offered HNY? I really doubt because she was ageing and past her prime then. Why'd anyone offer her HNY instead of Deepika, Anushka, Katrina etc?

Originally posted by: atominis

Was she indeed offered HNY? I really doubt because she was ageing and past her prime then. Why'd anyone offer her HNY instead of Deepika, Anushka, Katrina etc?

Also back in 2013 when the movie was being shot she still looked great (she still looks good but obviously aged).

Oh okay. But I have seen much less of SRK with Bachchans ever since Abhi-Ash wedding. Earlier they did lot of films, magazine covers, photo shoots, talk shows and stage performances together and almost looked like extended family.

Salman and Vivek are also obviously seen nowhere near Bachchans now. Even Salim Khan who made Amitabh's career is not seen much around Bachchans now.

I only remember Aamir being invited once at launch of a book on Bachchan senior and some event for Paa in 2009.

I was surprised Aamir and Amitabh worked together in Thugs of Hindustan because they had never worked together before and Aamir was seen only once with Sr Bachchan in real life in 2009.

Bachchans have been seen quite less interacting with Khans and Vivek after Ash married into the family.

Because of Aradhya

Originally posted by: bollyqueen0

MDMA nahi, MDNA.

MDMA is the drug they both do before making posts like this 😆

I love Mugda 😭 She's unbeatable. She rarely replies 😭 I wonder what she would reply back 🙈

IMO Aish feels she doesn't need to work in anything and everything anymore. She has enough money and fame to wait for solid authorbacked roles with good directors. Maybe a role that gives her legacy. She has just HDDCS and Jodha Akbar as of now

Nandini in Ponniyin sylvan is one such role and Mani Rathnam is a good director. I hope she does justice to it. As unlike Jodha Akbar in this she has to do more than just look a graceful queen. Because that story has 3 heroes and two major supporting characters, one heroine but only one villain that is going to be Aishwarya. All the other negative characters are only supporting roles.

Nandini in ponniyin sylvan is on par with Hannibal lector in graceful negativity without the cannibalism part.

Will Aishwarya be able to bring that menace and charm to the fore is what needs to be seen.

Even if she doesn't do justice to that role, it makes sense for her to sign on roles like that than do fluff roles like ADHm or fanney khan

Is binodini dasi shelved. That is a very good role too