Who is the most successful Khan ever??? - Page 4

Not a fan of SRK movies but has to give it to the guy.

For me successful is not equal to only box office. This guy came from a crowd like us, had will to slog it out, dreamt things beyond reach at that point of time, worked towards making them reality, Made a name for himself not only in India but around the world. He is well educated, a successful entrepreneur, a happy family man (keeping aside his "alleged" affairs). This is success for me. He is an inspiration for many beyond Bollywood.

overall srk without a doubt

salman is very close tho

they were neck to neck in 90s things went way to down for salman in 2000s

later he made the best comeback ever in bollywood

hopefully hrithik follow the same suit after super30 n war 👍🏼

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

overall srk without a doubt

salman is very close tho

they were neck to neck in 90s things went way to down for salman in 2000s

later he made the best comeback ever in bollywood

hopefully hrithik follow the same suit after super30 n war 👍🏼

SRK & Salman were not neck to neck in 90s, SRK was far ahead of Salman

Originally posted by: forza

SRK & Salman were not neck to neck in 90s, SRK was far ahead of Salman

https://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/145301/

We finally have the analysis of the most successful actors between 1990 – 1999. It’s a decade that marked the rise of the three Khans, while Ajay Devgn and Akshay Kumar were growing their fanbase and delivering quite a few hits in between.

Salman Khan leads in every category – highest net collections, success ratio, hit ratio and the best average per film. He also has the highest grosser and the most watched film of the 90s in Sooraj Barjatya’s Hum Aapke Hain Kaun.

Salman and Shah Rukh are the only two actors to average more than 10 crore plus per film.

Most number of films:

• Akshay Kumar – 42 films
• Ajay Devgn – 33 films
• Salman Khan – 29 films
• Shah Rukh Khan – 28 films
• Aamir Khan – 23 films

Total Net Collections for each actor between 1990 – 1999:

• Salman Khan – 375 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 327 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 221 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 196 crore
• Aamir Khan – 186 crore

Average net box office collections per film between 1990 – 1999

• Salman Khan – 12.9 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 11.7 crore
• Aamir Khan – 8.1 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 6.7 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 4.7 crore

Success Ratio i.e Above Average or better

• Salman Khan – 52%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 39%
• Ajay Devgn – 36%
• Aamir Khan – 35%
• Akshay Kumar – 24%

Hit Ratio i.e Hit or Better

• Salman Khan – 45%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 32%
• Aamir Khan – 22%
• Ajay Devgn – 18%
• Akshay Kumar – 10%

Note: We haven’t included two prolific actors – Sunny Deol and Govinda – in the list. Deol was a superstar, even though he wasn’t very consistent at the box office. He had quite a few hugely successful films like Border, Darr, Zindi and Ghatak, just to name a few. Govinda delivered several hits with David Dhawan and was one of the most popular and successful actors of the 90s. We are currently in the process of retrieving data from old film magazines. We are also working with a well-known trade analyst to rectify the 90s data, which isn’t as accurate as we’d want it to be at the moment.

😆

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

🤣 infact salman was ahead in 90s

https://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/145301/

We finally have the analysis of the most successful actors between 1990 – 1999. It’s a decade that marked the rise of the three Khans, while Ajay Devgn and Akshay Kumar were growing their fanbase and delivering quite a few hits in between.

Salman Khan leads in every category – highest net collections, success ratio, hit ratio and the best average per film. He also has the highest grosser and the most watched film of the 90s in Sooraj Barjatya’s Hum Aapke Hain Kaun.

Salman and Shah Rukh are the only two actors to average more than 10 crore plus per film.

Most number of films:

• Akshay Kumar – 42 films
• Ajay Devgn – 33 films
• Salman Khan – 29 films
• Shah Rukh Khan – 28 films
• Aamir Khan – 23 films

Total Net Collections for each actor between 1990 – 1999:

• Salman Khan – 375 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 327 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 221 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 196 crore
• Aamir Khan – 186 crore

Average net box office collections per film between 1990 – 1999

• Salman Khan – 12.9 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 11.7 crore
• Aamir Khan – 8.1 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 6.7 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 4.7 crore

Success Ratio i.e Above Average or better

• Salman Khan – 52%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 39%
• Ajay Devgn – 36%
• Aamir Khan – 35%
• Akshay Kumar – 24%

Hit Ratio i.e Hit or Better

• Salman Khan – 45%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 32%
• Aamir Khan – 22%
• Ajay Devgn – 18%
• Akshay Kumar – 10%

Note: We haven’t included two prolific actors – Sunny Deol and Govinda – in the list. Deol was a superstar, even though he wasn’t very consistent at the box office. He had quite a few hugely successful films like Border, Darr, Zindi and Ghatak, just to name a few. Govinda delivered several hits with David Dhawan and was one of the most popular and successful actors of the 90s. We are currently in the process of retrieving data from old film magazines. We are also working with a well-known trade analyst to rectify the 90s data, which isn’t as accurate as we’d want it to be at the moment.

😆

Kurate Ki Bayiyaa Ko Upar Chadhayi Ke

Masti Mein Rahte Hai Panavaa Chabayi Ke 🤗

Am surprised this is even a question. SRK. Salman is successful, but if you factor in getting his first movie offer on a platter, then SRK’s success curve is more acute.

Originally posted by: MunnaBadnamHua

🤣 infact salman was ahead in 90s

https://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/145301/

We finally have the analysis of the most successful actors between 1990 – 1999. It’s a decade that marked the rise of the three Khans, while Ajay Devgn and Akshay Kumar were growing their fanbase and delivering quite a few hits in between.

Salman Khan leads in every category – highest net collections, success ratio, hit ratio and the best average per film. He also has the highest grosser and the most watched film of the 90s in Sooraj Barjatya’s Hum Aapke Hain Kaun.

Salman and Shah Rukh are the only two actors to average more than 10 crore plus per film.

Most number of films:

• Akshay Kumar – 42 films
• Ajay Devgn – 33 films
• Salman Khan – 29 films
• Shah Rukh Khan – 28 films
• Aamir Khan – 23 films

Total Net Collections for each actor between 1990 – 1999:

• Salman Khan – 375 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 327 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 221 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 196 crore
• Aamir Khan – 186 crore

Average net box office collections per film between 1990 – 1999

• Salman Khan – 12.9 crore
• Shah Rukh Khan – 11.7 crore
• Aamir Khan – 8.1 crore
• Ajay Devgn – 6.7 crore
• Akshay Kumar – 4.7 crore

Success Ratio i.e Above Average or better

• Salman Khan – 52%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 39%
• Ajay Devgn – 36%
• Aamir Khan – 35%
• Akshay Kumar – 24%

Hit Ratio i.e Hit or Better

• Salman Khan – 45%
• Shah Rukh Khan – 32%
• Aamir Khan – 22%
• Ajay Devgn – 18%
• Akshay Kumar – 10%

😆

I’m confused about something. You may proceed to give me your mathematical and analytical assistance here. This analysis shows a small difference between Salman & SRK. Salman is a few crores and percentages ahead of SRK between 1990-1999. But isn’t that also possible because Salman had 29 films and SRK had 28? I mean don’t you think that by one extra movie, it was possible that SRK would have closed or even crossed that very minute gap?

Clarify this with me 😊

Originally posted by: NeemKaP

Am surprised this is even a question. SRK. Salman is successful, but if you factor in getting his first movie offer on a platter, then SRK’s success curve is more acute.

He wasn’t even the main lead in his first movie

Salman Khan. He is a criminal and yet he is the one who if Godfather of so many other criminals in Bollywood. launching girls and making his female army of supporters.

Originally posted by: FingerFetish

I’m confused about something. You may proceed to give me your mathematical and analytical assistance here. This analysis shows a small difference between Salman & SRK. Salman is a few crores and percentages ahead of SRK between 1990-1999. But isn’t that also possible because Salman had 29 films and SRK had 28? I mean don’t you think that by one extra movie, it was possible that SRK would have closed or even crossed that very minute gap?

Clarify this with me 😊

Nope I guess. Coz srk's average earning per movie is 11.7 cr and Salman's is 12.9cr.. so unless his movie earned like crazy money, which was rare in that decade ,he wouldn't close that gap ...Salman always had the BO numbers on his side dunno why and how.😆