Subhash K. Jha's article - Page 4

This is lost his credibility as an entertainment journalist long back. Subhash K. Jha is doing everything he typically does.

He's clearing SLB's name ke he gave Sushant all the three movies. Which incidentally Ranveer ended up doing. SLB INNOCENT HAIN, is the gist of the article lol.

I don't know how low people can get. He made Sushant an accomplice in bitching about Vaani. The guy's dead and he can't defend himself toh kuch bhi bologe uske naam pe? Vileness ki hadd hoti hain.

And he fired shots at Ranveer saying he partly owes his success to Sushant. Again, typical.

These mouthpieces are one by one speaking up for their masters. The same chant : shut down the conversation about Nepotism. Guess all the masters are feeling the heat as they are sending these lapdogs one by one.

Originally posted by: dedh

Yes to the bolded part. No to the last sentence, because it's not that simple and sometimes people will not allow themselves to be helped.

Regardless of SSR-related reasons and circumstances, whoever gives any credibility to vile twat Subhash K. Jha, needs to get their head examined. 🤢

I completely agree with you that a lot of times, people don’t allow themselves to be helped. But as an onlooker or 3rd party, isn’t it natural for us to question those who knew as to why they didn’t try. There are some who might have tried, but a lot of the way these BW people are posting, it appears that they knew & not only did they not try, they took advantage of that to bully him. They are doing the same even after his death.

Ewww..is he for real? And is the kind of trash we want to encourage? Why post this here even and give it any attention? 🤢

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

This is lost his credibility as an entertainment journalist long back. Subhash K. Jha is doing everything he typically does.

He's clearing SLB's name ke he gave Sushant all the three movies. Which incidentally Ranveer ended up doing. SLB INNOCENT HAIN, is the gist of the article lol.

I don't know how low people can get. He made Sushant an accomplice in bitching about Vaani. The guy's dead and he can't defend himself toh kuch bhi bologe uske naam pe? Vileness ki hadd hoti hain.

And he fired shots at Ranveer saying he partly owes his success to Sushant. Again, typical.

These mouthpieces are one by one speaking up for their masters. The same chant : shut down the conversation about Nepotism. Guess all the masters are feeling the heat as they are sending these lapdogs one by one.

Before Sushant's untimely demise SKJ used to chant Ranveer owes his success to Ranbir no mention of Sushant ever in his articles. Now he has changed his narrative to suit his agenda.

I don't know why people still believes what this shit stirrer writes. He can't keep with the different versions of the story he himself writes.

And this jha is a huge liar, sushant was not offered all 3 of slb's films. If sushant was offered BM and padmavat I'm sure he wud have said yes, but sushant was not offered these films, these films were always going to have Ranveer, slb offered BM to Ranveer while they were filming ramleela

And jha again has to shade Ranveer, by saying he owes part of his success to sushant, what nonsense! Ranveer earned all the success he got on his own right!

Originally posted by: zoinks

His lies are even worse than blinds. He would quote his own lies and say it was told by a celeb's friend.Here it's a dead person.

Mujhe itna ghussa aaraha hain, hantel. I feel disgusted kyunki marne ke baad bhi usko ek blind ( unnamed actress and all) mein fasaya jaa raha hain. Log kitne neeche gir sakte hain. Woh tab bhi kuch bol nahi paya, woh aaj bhi kuch bol nahi payega.

This article is all sorts of repulsive. All these journos have basically proved Sushant right in how low they can go

SKJ, yeh toh sabde baada rumorchod hai, isne jitne khayali pulao banai hain, utne toh kisine nahi banai.

The only time Sushants name was associated For a project with SLB was with PriYanka and Irrfan I think. The rest appeared suddenly as a rumour.

But since the contract of YRF is in the hand of the police now. let’s see when he signed that piece that he couldnt do Ram-Leela like they say. He must have signed that between 2011-2012.
Cause ranveer was at that time attached to that movie.

It's about time we stop using biki hui media to influence our opinions. Most of these articles are written with an agenda rather than an organic outpouring. A few could've been paid jobs as well.

We are extremely dependent on them, and they're leveraging that to make and break people.

Forums like this can be much better sources of information. Until the time comes when bots become increasingly convincing, at least.