Manikarnika Director Krish Finally Speaks Out On WHAT WENT WRONG - Page 21

Created

Last reply

Replies

242

Views

27.8k

Users

67

Likes

886

Frequent Posters

tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
Good to hear his POV
This is what I gather from hearing both sides

while Krish wanted to make a movie about 1857 freedom struggle, Kangna wanted to make it about Manikarnika, Queen of Jhansi.

In the end the producers went with Kangna's vision.

What I don't understand is why he wanted to give Sonu Sood's character so much importance. He plays a rat in the movie, why so much grandeur for him.

I understand his view on Tatiya Tope's role but Tatiya Tope deserves a biopic on his own, his part cannot be justified in a movie about Jhansi Ki Rani.





576281 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: DushtKanya


Yeah apparently not

Rangoli Chandel Retweeted
Aman parihar @AmanPar16897725
More

#Manikarnika is trending .#KanganaRanaut has done justice to it. Don't think there is anyone who could play this better than her. Its her career best performance .she showed that "work speaks itself " A big & tight slap to kangana' s haters @karanjohar @iHrithik @sonamakapoor

1 reply17 retweets39 likes
Reply
1
Retweet
17
Like
39
Direct message



Ooopsie...😆
Now when did Sonam Kapoor join the ranks?😆

Anyways
Illyrion thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Anyone else feels like this is all publicity lol

No one (normal) wants the kind of abuse that's going to be dumped on Krish and anyone that tries to support him, certainly not for publicity 3 days after the release of a film. In one segment of the Krish -Faridoon interview, Krish says "she will say anything " and she will. She will call people names and accuse them of simply terrible things and it sticks - a certain segment of the population will believe it forever. She doesn't have or need any proof and she has absolutely no morality when it comes to putting black marks on the reputations of anyone who doesn't support her and please her in every way. She holds films hostage refusing to finish patchwork or dub until she gets her way. She gets producers to betray others to just get a release of a film they have tens of Crore invested in. Kamal Jain has had health issues. Hansal Mehta released some Twitter statement today implying she put him through hell but refusing to say anything further. Sorry but if she really put him through what I think she did he should man up and tell his story - it might save others in the future. Emotional harassment and financial blackmail is abuse and should be talked about. It's the same thing with domestic or sexual abuse. It's easier to cry in private; I get that and you have the right to but it's so much braver to call out the abuser and maybe prevent it happening again to someone else. Krish has my respect and thanks. I very much hope he will not be much affected since he has his own bigger career in the south. Hope the floodgates open and everyone on Manikarnika and Simran and Rangoon and TWMR tell their Kangana stories.
Illyrion thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: tina59

Good to hear his POV

This is what I gather from hearing both sides

while Krish wanted to make a movie about 1857 freedom struggle, Kangna wanted to make it about Manikarnika, Queen of Jhansi.

In the end the producers went with Kangna's vision.

What I don't understand is why he wanted to give Sonu Sood's character so much importance. He plays a rat in the movie, why so much grandeur for him.

I understand his view on Tatiya Tope's role but Tatiya Tope deserves a biopic on his own, his part cannot be justified in a movie about Jhansi Ki Rani.





Every hero needs an anti hero. Having a caricature British officer as the anti hero was a poor choice. Having a worthy opponent makes the hero and the story more awe inspiring. The introduction of Sonu's character was supposed to show him as a formidable opponent. Too bad Kangana is too insecure to trust she would have looked more heroic playing against a strong antihero. (Or not smart enough to understand the concept - maybe she should have taken a longer screenwriting course).
SriRani thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: DushtKanya


Yeah apparently not

Rangoli Chandel Retweeted

#Manikarnika is trending .#KanganaRanaut has done justice to it. Don't think there is anyone who could play this better than her. Its her career best performance .she showed that "work speaks itself " A big & tight slap to kangana' s haters @karanjohar @iHrithik @sonamakapoor

1 reply17 retweets39 likes
Reply
1
Retweet
17
Like
39
Direct message


I know she will open her potty mouth as soon as she receives some positive response.
tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Nova19

Every hero needs an anti hero. Having a caricature British officer as the anti hero was a poor choice. Having a worthy opponent makes the hero and the story more awe inspiring. The introduction of Sonu's character was supposed to show him as a formidable opponent. Too bad Kangana is too insecure to trust she would have looked more heroic playing against a strong antihero. (Or not smart enough to understand the concept - maybe she should have taken a longer screenwriting course).


Not necessary

I didn't feel his role would have made any difference whatsoever. He was a rat and was shown that way.

The main antagonist were the British and they dont need to show the British with grandeur , they were on point with the intro of Hugh Rose.

Looking at Sonu Sood's intro scene that Kangna cut , even more happy, thank god , Sadashiv Rao doesn't need any grandeur both in intro or death or anything, he was a rat, a backstabber and zeeshan has done it well .

Prasoon JoshiVerified account @prasoonjoshi_
More

Kangana hasn't only given an outstanding performance she's also elevated thefilm toanother level thru her Direction n commitment.Let not any controversy take that away from her. It's been a tough journey n am all fr celebrating everyone's contribution. Here's 2team #Manikarnika



Edited by tina59 - 6 years ago
TheRowdiest thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: tina59

In the end the producers went with Kangna's vision.[/DIV]
[DIV]

What I don't understand is why he wanted to give Sonu Sood's character so much importance.



@bold - there is only one vision - director's vision , actors should not interfere in it . Then every actor will have his/her own vision but they are not Directing the movie or writing . After movie is completed , no one has any right to temper with Director's vision and his work . Itna hi issue tha toh she shld have direct the movie frm the start .

@Sonu part - Director wanted Sonu's Character bcz that's how they wrote the story and narrated to Kangana and shot it . Actors have no right to interfere in his vision and writers' script . If you don't like it don't sign the movie .
tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago

Kangana has done no less a job than Krish: Manikarnika writer Vijayendra Prasad


The historical film, starring Kangana Ranaut, is due to be released on 25 January 2019.

Mumbai - 19 Jan 2019 23:00 IST

IANS

Veteran writer Vijayendra Prasad, who has worked on the Manikarnika: The Queen Of Jhansi (2019) the most controversial film of his career says Kangana Ranaut, who stepped in to "complete" the film, did no less than what the movie's initial director Krish did.

Excerpts from an interview:

So many controversies. Can we talk about them?

Sure, but let me be very honest, I will answer only if I can. Otherwise I won't lie to you. What are the controversies?

Well, first of all, the original director Krish was relieved of his duties and replaced by the film's leading lady Kangana Ranaut?

I don't think 'relieved' is the correct word. Krish wasn't asked to go. The picture was started in June 2018 and was supposed to be released in August 2019. But because of the volume of shooting, the film got delayed. And Krish, who shares a very good relationship with Mr [Nandamuri] Balakrishna was committed to direct a film on the latter's father NTR's life after the original director for that project, Teja, could not do the film.

Krish had already done a big hit with Mr Balakrishna. There was no way we could hold Krish back. We had to let him go. It was just 10-15 days of shooting left.

You've reshot only 10-15 days?

That was the original plan. But then Kangana thought some extra action scenes were needed and I concurred with her. She was right. The film looks so much more spectacular with those war scenes. Kangana just completed the film.

It is being said you are one of the causes for the rift between Kangana and Krish?

(laughs) Not at all. Absolutely not. To my knowledge, there is no rift between Kangana and Krish.

People say you are supportive of Kangana and not Krish in their conflict?

No, I am supportive of the movie. I haven't taken sides at all. I've seen Krish has done a wonderful job of shooting the film. But I'd say Kangana has done no less a job than Krish. When I saw the rushes, I cannot differentiate between what Krish and Kangana have shot.

But Kangana has no experience in direction whereas Krish has a whole body of work behind him?

We saw her abilities on the sets and she has made active contribution to many of her films. Krish couldn't direct the two biopics simultaneously. We couldn't get a newcomer to complete our film. We had the option of waiting for Krish to finish the Balakrishna movie and then take up the shooting of Manikarnika again. This would have meant a further delay.

Because no other director of repute would have stepped in to complete the film at that late a stage, and Kangana has an aptitude for direction, so we chose her.

But how did you see that aptitude in her?

From the studio where she was shooting as an actor, from what the producers said. She was ably assisted by the entire team and she knew what was doing.

Have you seen the finished product?

Not yet.

No one in recent times has succeeded in making a film on Rani Laxmibai?

Sohrab Modi directed a remarkable film on the Rani in the past. In recent times, nobody. We've covered her entire life from birth to death in just two hours. I must add that I've a personal connection with this movie.

How so?

Manikarnika was the name the Rani Of Jhansi was given by her parents. It was changed after marriage according to Maharashtrian tradition. My own daughter's name is Manikarnika. So I have a special fondness for that name.

After the release of the film, there may be many parents naming their daughters Manikarnika?

I hope so.

Edited by tina59 - 6 years ago
576281 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: tina59

Good to hear his POV

This is what I gather from hearing both sides

while Krish wanted to make a movie about 1857 freedom struggle, Kangna wanted to make it about Manikarnika, Queen of Jhansi.

In the end the producers went with Kangna's vision.

What I don't understand is why he wanted to give Sonu Sood's character so much importance. He plays a rat in the movie, why so much grandeur for him.

I understand his view on Tatiya Tope's role but Tatiya Tope deserves a biopic on his own, his part cannot be justified in a movie about Jhansi Ki Rani.






How did you get to this conclusion?

He clearly stated the vision of the movie is his and he was the one who said the story shouldn't be about just one place or one event from the Rani's life but should reflect what a phenomenon she was and hence came up with the title Manikarnika!

You don't have to make a biopic to give a character some respect...A strong supporting character will only enhance further the strength of the main protagonist...A movie is a team work not a ramp walk of one single individual...This is not the first time Kangana has made sure that she will be the only one getting good reviews from her movies...


tina59 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: TheRowdiest



@bold - there is only one vision - director's vision , actors should not interfere in it . Then every actor will have his/her own vision but they are not Directing the movie or writing . After movie is completed , no one has any right to temper with Director's vision and his work . Itna hi issue tha toh she shld have direct the movie frm the start .

@Sonu part - Director wanted Sonu's Character bcz that's how they wrote the story and narrated to Kangana and shot it . Actors have no right to interfere in his vision and writers' script . If you don't like it don't sign the movie .


I disagree, creative inputs should always be encouraged from everyone. Each one is playing a part in the movie, their inputs should be heard. You just cannot have one vision and one perspective in art. thats my opinion.

Also, the writers too had a vision on how the movie should shape up and the producers went with her vision.

I cannot fathom how he could spend invest so much time on Sonu Sood's character. Look into history about Sadasheo Rao , brother of Gangadar Rao, not much about him except a backstabber.

why give Sonu Sood so much importance , grand entry and all that.

why was Sonu sood shoting for 45 days and 100 minutes when he is NOT the main antagonist


Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: BhataktiJawani

1 months ago

Jaya was madly in love with Aishwarya, then what went wrong?

I randomly came across this and now i wonder what went wrong https://m.youtube.com/shorts/bR2GLuYsW-8

https://m.youtube.com/shorts/bR2GLuYsW-8
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Sultan.Mirza

1 months ago

What went wrong with Dhadak 2 in context with Anti-Nepo Supporters?

For years, ppl rant about how KJO isn't giving opportunities to newcomers or outsiders, other than Nepo Kids. Here, Dharma brought 2 outsiders -...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

1 months ago

Ibrahim speaks nicely to deaf and mute fan

Ibrahim speaks nicely to deaf and mute fan https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMgJnZiztI_/?igsh=MWZsNXdkazBvbXE2dg==

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

5 months ago

Sara Ali Khan speaks about Saif Ali Khan stabbing incident

Sara Ali Khan speaks about Saif Ali Khan stabbing incident https://www.instagram.com/reel/DHunUqgxGrS/?igsh=MTAweXBsczFyenFjdg==

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: priya185

6 months ago

Aaliyah Qureishi interview- speaks about SRK, Ibrahim, Khushi and KJO

"Ibrahim Ali Khan is the life of the party" Ask Aaliyah how Ibrahim was on the sets, and she shares, “He is warm, fun and extroverted. Ibrahim...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".