Godzilla (2014)
I decided to revisit Godzilla in preparation for Godzilla: King of Monsters next week. Rather than a film review, this is more of a cultural review.
Godzilla is a beloved monster franchise out of Japan. First portrayed in 1954, Godzilla is the byproduct of the atomic bomb. Japan is the only country in the world that has been attacked by a nuclear bomb, that too twice. Nuclear fallout is ingrained in Japanese culture, especially in the '50s. Culturally, Godzilla is a metaphor for nuclear weapons and the United States. The destructive nuclear mutation monster represents the fear of being attacked again. His destruction of cities evokes the destruction by nuclear arms.
Over time the image of Godzilla has softened. He has gone from villain to heroic. There are many monsters in his universe now. While sometimes he is still villainous, he mostly protects the world from the other monsters. Can there be any more perfect metaphor? The monster universe of nuclear monster could encompass the growing nuclear world. At the center is Godzilla, the first, the king, the USA. Just like the USA, even at his benevolent best, Godzilla is still an indiscriminately destructive monster.
The 1998 Godzilla movie failed because it tried to make a monster movie. By making Godzilla as the singular villain, it completely missed the socio-cultural nuances of Godzilla. The narrative lacked nuance.
The 2014 reboot in the monsterverse pitted Godzilla against MUTOs. Initially feared as a villain he protects humans against MUTO. He is celebrated as a liberator of cities. However, he almost decimates San Francisco in the process. It is a much sharper depiction of human folly and its outcomes. Godzilla is a hero, but a monster too. I'm curious of the upcoming movies in the Monsterverse. Because at the same time they are worldbuilding.
612