Originally posted by: Sabhayata
Really I mean Sati and Jauhar are as different as Sky and Earth . How people can't see the difference between the two is beyond me. And I don't get this glorification jaap. The movie is about a queen who is revered for committing Jauhar of course that fact will be glorified. It's like saying if a movie is made on Alexander then don't glorify his conquests. Of course it will be glorifies since he is known for conquering the world. Where were these letters when Baijorao mastani glorified love affair with a second woman. That time every one was fine no one called it regressive. Because every one understood the time period the movie was made in.. So what is the issue now? Can some one explain to me as per Swara what should have Padmavati done?
1