Bollywood can survive beyond the Khans - Page 2

Originally posted by: thakor88

i dont know how khans got into movies. i have done theater for more than 10yrs now. and i know what acting is. the khans who just have the looks,the body, AND THE TITLE KHAN. becomes famous in a month. thats dumb. i hate people who cant act or are just here to make fun of bollywood. remember farah khan said in a interview that she doesnt watch hindi movies and doesnt like them and why the hell did she even make main hoon na, and making all the stars dance. these people make me sick. they should go to acting classes and learn something😡

I'm surprised that you being in theatre cannot recognize such hard work...that certainly shows your exprience...Khans have worked for more than tn years to get to this position...it wasn't just handed to them...and belive me...a million people just cannot be wrong in finding the true actors😳...and acting lesons...if this is not what yu call acting...I would certainly want to know your definition of "Acting"😕

I would say...this is yet another phase...if you ask me...it will be long time till the Khans give up thier throne.

Originally posted by: thakor88

Those Movies Didnt Became A Hit Because Of The Stars. It Could Have been Something Else

i really dont think so, its just lyk saying kaho naa pyar hai didnt become a hit cuz of hrithik it was sumthing else 😕... i mean realistically besides acting and story wat else cud there have beeen that made those films a hit.... if u luk at how famous all three khans became ever since then, then truly it was them that made their debut films a hit, one cant deny a fact just cuz they dislike them.

Originally posted by: .:Aphrodite:.

Khans are overrated.

Yes Bollywood has survived and will survive without them. They're all bigheaded and overhyped. Except Saif ali Khan, he's the most talented Khan.

Hrithik gave two blockbusters this year. He is the only one who WORKS for the role. I am not talking about growing moustache to fit a character. I am talking about the way he trained for Krrish, the way he did all the stunts for D2 and Krrish, the way he gets involved with the character.

He looks like an international model and has talents to match his looks. He will make it big in every movie industry because he is hardworking and has the drive and determination.

Also if the so called King Khan and other Khans (barring Saif he is truely talented) stop blowing their own trumpets and start working a bit harder, then yes I will take them seriously.

not to be mean but if u call saif talented over these three then that is really awkward... im not doubting saif's capability, but a person who took about well lets say more than eight years to get his first solo hit is not talented as compared to those who have shown their potential from the very start... in my opinion saif has just began his career as he has just started to show sum talent within him, i mean truly just cuz he has performed a few variety of roles in two years one cant make him cross the top leading actors who have shown their talent from the start....

and then u r stating that all three of them r overhyped??? so they have been overhyped for 18-19 years???? all that time they have been overhyped 😕... after a few years wen hrithik grows older in the industry and sumone new pops up and is becoming a rising star, wat will we state then, how hrithik is just overhyped? i mean regardless of who one's fav actor/actress is, we cant deny the reality...i think that if one really sees the way the khans have ruled bollywood then one myt really realize that existing in the industry for so long is cuz of hard work... do u know how hard it is to make a mark in bollywood.. its not so simple...

luk at hrithik, he has the luks and the body along wid his acting, which u have to admit contributes to his poplualarity a lot.... but did one ever really see how srk got famous... i being a big fan of srk have to say that srk is famous mostl;y cuz of his acting.... he doznt have the body lyk hrithik to make it easier for him to attract audiences, but its the hard work that attracts us towards him.... i really cant see how one can state that the khans r overhyped... i mean that shows unawareness....😕... and on top of that saif being more talented then them?... im really sorry to say but doing variety of roles after such a long time in ur career doz not necessarily make u the most talented around, he needs to show more to be even called one of the best.

Originally posted by: mini2390

not to be mean but if u call saif talented over these three then that is really awkward... im not doubting saif's capability, but a person who took about well lets say more than eight years to get his first solo hit is not talented as compared to those who have shown their potential from the very start... in my opinion saif has just began his career as he has just started to show sum talent within him, i mean truly just cuz he has performed a few variety of roles in two years one cant make him cross the top leading actors who have shown their talent from the start....

and then u r stating that all three of them r overhyped??? so they have been overhyped for 18-19 years???? all that time they have been overhyped 😕... after a few years wen hrithik grows older in the industry and sumone new pops up and is becoming a rising star, wat will we state then, how hrithik is just overhyped? i mean regardless of who one's fav actor/actress is, we cant deny the reality...i think that if one really sees the way the khans have ruled bollywood then one myt really realize that existing in the industry for so long is cuz of hard work... do u know how hard it is to make a mark in bollywood.. its not so simple...

luk at hrithik, he has the luks and the body along wid his acting, which u have to admit contributes to his poplualarity a lot.... but did one ever really see how srk got famous... i being a big fan of srk have to say that srk is famous mostl;y cuz of his acting.... he doznt have the body lyk hrithik to make it easier for him to attract audiences, but its the hard work that attracts us towards him.... i really cant see how one can state that the khans r overhyped... i mean that shows unawareness....😕... and on top of that saif being more talented then them?... im really sorry to say but doing variety of roles after such a long time in ur career doz not necessarily make u the most talented around, he needs to show more to be even called one of the best.

prove it

srk is actually a king khan and people have voted him and that is its proof

Originally posted by: srk_biggest_fan

THERE ARE MANY LIKE HRITICK IN TV AND EVERYWHERE BUT THERE IS NOONE LIKE SHARUKH FIRST HE RULED ON TV AND THEN BOLLYWOOD WITHOUT ANY GODFATHER BUT WITH HIS DETERMINATION AND WORK HARD UNLIKE HRITICK WHOSE FATHER IS ALL BEHIND HIM AND GIVING HIM AND TRYING TO MAKING HIM SUPERSTAR.WHATEVER SHARUKH IS TODAY HE IS HIS OWN THAT WHAT MAKES A PERSON TRULY KING NOT SOME FATHER-MAKING-DESI-SUPER-HERO.

I hope u got it now😡

I dont understand why every1 always calls Hrithik a dad made star....I mean ya Rakesh has a big hand in making Hrithik successful, but when ppl go to the theatre they dont go see Rakesh they go see Hrithik and his acting....the only reason Hrithik always delievers hits with his dad is cauz FilmKraft always comes up with different stories and lately they have brought Sci-fi movies into bollywood...i think Hrithik was superb in Mission Kashmire and obviosuly Dhoom 2 which arent his dads films...and so far all of his upcomings are outside of his dad's banner...and anywayz Hrithik has gotten soo much success in just 6 yrs which does prove that hes a perfect actor...good looks, good acting skills, excellent dancing skills and perfect chemistry with his co-stars...give him another 10 yrs and he'll b the next king of bollywood

I somewhat agree and disagree with everyone here 😆

Firstly,Hrithik,Abhishek and John are upcomming stars,and superstardom is imminent for Hrithik and Abhishek ...John,Cant really predict as of now whether he would be a superstar 😕

But still,these 3 have a long way to go before they can dethrone the Khans....SRk and Aamir YET deliver hits,Both had a reasonably good year at the BO with RDB,Fanaa,KANK,and Don being hits....Agreed 2006 belonged to Hrithik,but he needs to be consistent with his Hits before we can say he has taken over the Khans....I remember reading similar articles when KHPH released,the Fourth Estate pitted Hrithik against SRK(which was unfair) and then zealously brought him down when a couple of movies flopped!..If God forbid Jodha Akbar and KT flop,then the media would bring him down with the same fervour as they are hyping him now.....Ditto with Abhishek...He was so overhyped last year(make no mistake,2005 belonged to Abhishek..He was the only actor with 4 hits a ka Bunty Babli,Sarkarr,Dus and Bluffmaster),and this year he is in the news more for his dalliance with Ash,than for his acting(which was under the butcher's knife)....For all we know,2007 might belong to ABhi again...And not to forget,the Khans arent yet pass,they are very much there kicking ass!

Regarding the talent of the Khans,Salman isnt a great actor(very charitably put),Saif is slowly finding his rythm and he can definitely ACT👏,SRk can act,but his acting is very much clichd,and the staleness stinks 🤢 ....Aamir though is mightily talented,he doesnt get stuck in a rut and do only formula films and his acting is top notch👏...He makes good films,which work!...His forthcoming films ---One based on the farmer's plight,another one about an impaired child,and if he really goes ahead and makes a remake of the Tamil Film Gajini,then Boy,no one can stop him from winning awards galore,for that role is such a phenomenal one....I believe the movie Gajini was a masterpeice,a role played to perfection by the protagonist,and apparently,Aamir's keen on roping in the same director!!...Aamir would be the least affected by the current crop of upcoming actors,as he was never in the race for superstardom,and always works based on his own rules and ethics!!

Not to forget,Akshay Kumar...He's unarguably the most underrated actor,he has delivered as many hits as SRk has,and is consistent too with his hits....He's a good actor,as well as a commercially viable star,highly versatile and can dabble with any genre....Hrithik and Abhishek are miles upon miles from being a superstar,they can reach there if they chose the right scripts and strike a chord with all sections of the audience,but as of now...They can be at the most called A list actors with a truckload of potential..Hrithik is ahead of Abhishek as of today,but the tables can turn anytime...Though I sincerely hope Hrithik scales the heights,as he's the most deserving,hard working and sincere of the lot!😃👏

OMMMMMMMMMMMGGGGGGG y argue over these actors ..every1 has his time, ups n downs ...just look the kapoors n big b (as main character)..they have been overtake by KHANS who r still rulling the bollywood n r rocking for more than 19 long years 👏 👏 👏 ....It's too early to say that 'bollywood can survive beyond the khans' ..anyway just wait n c

Originally posted by: .:Aphrodite:.

not to mention Fiza - he was awesome there and it wasn't his dad's film. Dhoom 2 biggest hit of his career isn't his dad's film

if it was true then SRK can be called Karan Johar/Yashraj made actor

srk earned his status and proved himself to be in that group . they saw his work and then approached him unlike hritick whose father launched him.

Originally posted by: dark_devil_pak

srk earned his status and proved himself to be in that group . they saw his work and then approached him unlike hritick whose father launched him.

Who cares if his father launched him? The fact is that he's a great actor. Its not his fault his dad makes movies. And what if I were to tell you Yash Raj made SRK who he is today. Truth is someone is always behind an actor's success.

even if hrithikz father makes films, its hrithik who acts in it, and thats wat makes the difference, ryt! then its the same way for srk as well... if he doz more yash raj films then we shudnt forget that shahrukh acts in all of them, not yash chopra!

and if one compares srk and hrithik then srk had a less chance of becoming a superstar then hrithik, cuz if srk failed he wud have been gone, another chance myt not have been there for him....if u luk at their first films, srk didnt have any filmi background from which he cud have gotten help from if he failed but hrithik did.... srk reached his position on all his own, widout any support but only and only from hard work... and now wen he is a superstar from his hard work i really cant see how sumone can call srk over rated.