Originally posted by: UntamableSpirit
But that's not how she said it ---- if half knowledge is dangerous so is the *tone & context* on how things are said--!!!!she very decently expressed her views ---- sure u may not agree with them all like how i didn't ---- but I did like some of her points --- right or wrong offending not so offending depends on individuals ---- but she certainly doesn't deserve all the *gun blazing* imo --!!!@BI: *core* of her discussion was only on that ---- she wrote a lot ---- & with any writing there are bound to be certain things u may not agree with ---- & it's fine ---- but let's not start doubting her patriotism if she's feels & expresses differently ---- discuss it out rationally & i am sure there will be a lot more to what say has to say --!!!
i am a very simple person. i read it the way i see it.
if someone says death is inevitable so what if soldiers has to die.. i WILL judge that person.
nothing 'pfft' or 'philosophical' about death.. that too dying for country or for unknown civilians. no matter how much one is 'paid' to do it.
tone, context, intent.. would rather go for words.
she may not deserve the 'gun blazing' but our army doesn't deserve such dismissive views. no one died and appointed me spokesperson for army or defense forces but as someone who is grateful to those who are heroes i take offense.
ain't FOE a b*tch.
my tone is neutral. intent not aggressive. context: exchange of ideas in logical way. no snark or sarcasm.
0