Veera vs Bira First Edition: Ranbir as Barfi or Ranveer as Bajirao? - Page 5

Originally posted by: ThugLeader

So Ranveer could hypothetically do Barfi hence his Bajirao is better???? 😆
What kind of logic is that.
Also better done than said.

I guess that means Ranveer's range as an actor is larger than RK
in other words : RS can do variety of roles including RK's characters
but RK excels in ONE genre .
so RS is better performer

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

Why not? Hypothetically a lot of things have been said about lot of actors.

Can I imagine Ranbir doing a Bajirao with such ease? NO ..Why? because given his body of work and versitality I cannot fathom him being a Warrior .neither does he have that persona nor the malleability.

Nobody is denying him of his talents.

Can I imagine Ranveer doing a deaf and mute with ease ?YES .Given his dedication and malleability .Yes. His acting in every movie have been different where he has changed his body language to accents.

Yes better done than said. The day Ranbir does Bajirao with ease like Ranveer then we can easily compare and talk.

So Ranveer's performance as Bajirao is better than Ranbir 's performance as Barfi because Ranveer can hypothetically play Barfi, but Ranbir needs to play Bajirao first with ease like Ranveer, for his Barfi to be better than Ranveer's performance as Bajirao.
Yeab mate.
So Ranveer doing changes to his body language and mannerisms is genuis, while Ranbir making Barfi believable and without making a clinched dumb and deaf character is very good but not so impressive because Ranveer can hypothetically can be a dumb and deaf.

So Ranveer working on his accents is marvelous but Ranbir able to convey so much without able to utter a word is very good but not so impressive because Ranveer can hypothetically can be a dumb and deaf.

Thank you.

Everything about lunatic bajirao was just worst and Ranveer made him look like a clown. Thank God they didn't give him national award for that pathetic bajirao.

Originally posted by: RANVRAO

I guess that means Ranveer's range as an actor is larger than RK
in other words : RS can do variety of roles including RK's characters
but RK excels in ONE genre .
so RS is better performer

Just because someone goes under huge physical transformation or does impressive work on accents does not mean he/she does not give varied and versatile performance.

Ranbir 's Jordan is very different from his Barfi, his Rocket Singh is very different from his Sid, his Ved is very different from his Samar, his Bunny is very different from his Prem.
None of the above characters have same similar apart from being played By Ranbir.

Not seen Bajirao but for the sheer difficulty of performing a character like Barfi, bringing to it charm, ethos, pathos credibility over and beyond what one would think was possible is a feat not many could perform.

Ranbir in barfi hands down beats the performances of majority of the actors of his genre and a few of his seniors too...

Originally posted by: ThugLeader

So Ranveer's performance as Bajirao is better than Ranbir 's performance as Barfi because Ranveer can hypothetically play Barfi, but Ranbir needs to play Bajirao first with ease like Ranveer, for his Barfi to be better than Ranveer's performance as Bajirao.
Yeab mate.
So Ranveer doing changes to his body language and mannerisms is genuis, while Ranbir making Barfi believable and without making a clinched dumb and deaf character is very good but not so impressive because Ranveer can hypothetically can be a dumb and deaf.

So Ranveer working on his accents is marvelous but Ranbir able to convey so much without able to utter a word is very good but not so impressive because Ranveer can hypothetically can be a dumb and deaf.

Thank you.

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

Again.Buddy you are missing the point .

If talking hypothetically any situation is possible. Ranveer doing Barfi better and Ranbir doing Bajirao better.

But your initial comment was let the action do the talking so why can't Ranveer do it better was my point.

Okay, I got it now.
But my point was not that, my point was just because Ranveer can do Barfi better hypothetically means his Bajirao is better than Ranbir 's Barfi.

While same logic will not look out of place if we were overall comparing them as actors, but here we are comparing just two brilliant characters done by these brilliant actors. So that point in this convo is moot IMHO.

If the comparison is between Ranbir as Barfi and Ranveer as Bajirao, Ranbir wins it for me

Originally posted by: GrumpyTheCat

Now I want to see Ranbir do bajirao just to see him fail 😆 😆 😆