Why Kangana thinks Gangster is B-grade movie ? is it ? - Page 6

Originally posted by: SunHarsh4eva

So considering that Deepika had A-list affairs, Kangna thought she has to forget the Z-Grade Father pancholi ( her first Bollywood love ) & C-grade Suman son and eye the A-list superstar Hrithik, so that people stop calling her B-list. But unfortunately, Deepika still wins this no matter how many national awards Kangu gets, be it in terms of endorsements , films, popularity or even high profile affairs Deepika beats kangu's ass every single time.

Lastly, it's easy and convenient to say that actresses don't need big actors to survive but how many actresses survive in the long run without big films and male actors favoring them ? This is Bollywood for gods sake, that too were women have a low shelf life. History is evident that how since decades , be it Mashubala, Nargis, Hema, Rekha, Sridevi, Madhiri, Kajol, Kareena, Katrina and now Deepika are all favorites of all time not because they worked in national award winning films but because they stayed relevant due to their big contacts and ability to survive with the conniving and dominating make brigade and yeah all these actresses had high profile affairs with big male stars too.

If kangna can survive then it's good otherwise it's a stretch when people say that she doesn't need big stars and big films , and no she's not the top heroine, Deepika, Katrina and Kareena still beats her.

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

@mali89: That's why I said 'most' of her roles...Yes with a little variation here and there, she plays characters of somewhat similar traits...I have seen her in Queen, Gangster,Who Lamhe, Fashion, Katti Batti and TWMR...In all these, except in Queen, she plays very similar characters like as if they were an extension of each other...

Anyways, the bottom line for me is not how much successful someone is...I want to know how they behave when they get to the top...How they respect other people who have become successful...Because only those who are successful know that the journey to the top is not simple and easy no matter which way you take to go there...If you forget where you came from, very soon you will go back to that place...By repeatedly undermining her contemporaries and their growth, she is only exposing her own sad mindset...No matter how much her fans love her for speaking her mind and not 'sugar quoting' even if it reeks of jealousy and self pity, I personally cannot like her for putting other people down...

Originally posted by: mali89

It's because in Bwood they have the tendancy to typecast people. But for me her roles weren't the same. In Gangster she was more melancolic, in Fashion she was an arrogant druggy, in Woh Lahme she was suffering from mental problems...

Yes I understand but me I only want to see them in movies. I don't care about their personnal life. Celebs have a personna created so we can never know if they are genuine or not anyways.

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

We can never know if someone is genuine or not but we can get a peak into their work ethic and mindset with the kind of statements they make and with the way they treat others...I am not a fan of Deepkia but I am yet to see her giving any kind of statements about Kangana...Please prove me wrong if I am misinformed here...

@bold:Nice to find some common ground in all this...Because even to me their personal lives don't matter which is why I will perhaps continue to watch KR even though she did something spiteful to someone very close to me by making such a twisted and misdirecting headline about Aspergers...

Originally posted by: mali89

I hope you're wrong.

She is talented so interesting directors would still want to work with her. Hansal Mehta is supporting her, so is Anand L Rai... Btw, directors are kinda excentrics so they'll look at her craft instead at her personnal life and it seems to be the time for female oriented roles so she basically doesn't need a male A-lister to stay afloat. All she needs is commercial or critical success which she may gets with Rangoon, Simran and Rani of Jhansi.

I don't think mainstream Bollywood dislikes her ; and is there still such a thing as a mainstream Bollywood? Everyone seem to mix up because the commercial crowd wants critical success and vice versa. She's been praised a lot and note that people from Bollywood mainly stayed away from commenting this issue. Maybe they don't want to choose sides or they don't care because worse happen behind the scenes.

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

Which A-lister director is she working with? Other than the so called niche' cinema, tell me which director is willing to cast her in an out and out commercial cinema? Like I said, she is at most a Shabana Azmi ( I am being really generous here, for KR is yet to do even a percentage of the body of word that Shabana has)of this generation...Lots of critical acclaim and National awards with zero commercial viability...

And I don't understand why she is so full of herself when most of the roles she played so far are all somewhat similar roles...Where is the variety in the characters that she chooses...Most of them seem to be taken from the same book...

Originally posted by: DoneDeal

My Kattu baby started from Z grade and is now one of top actress. Even if people say she is bad acting. But she still managed. What are you smoking Nangu?

Originally posted by: colossial2015

Shabana Azmi is way to talented than Kangana.

All the characters played by Kangana looks similar.